A Damage Scenario for the 2012 Northern Italy Earthquakes and Estimation of the Economic Losses to Residential Buildings

In May 2012 a seismic sequence occurred in Northern Italy that was characterized by two main shocks with a magnitude range between 5.5 and 6. These shocks represent a good case study by which to quantify the monetary losses caused by a moderate earthquake in a densely populated and economically well-developed area. The loss estimation accounts for damage to residential buildings, and considers the full effect of all the seismic aftershock events that lasted for nearly a month. The building damage estimation is based on the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98) definitions, which depict the effects of an earthquake on built-up areas in terms of observed intensities. Input data sources are the residential building census provided by Istituto Nazionale di Statistica—the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT)—and the official market value of real estate assets, obtained from the Osservatorio del Mercato Immobiliare—the Real Estate Market Observatory (OMI). These data make it possible to quantify the economic losses due to earthquakes, an economic indicator updated yearly. The proposed multidisciplinary method takes advantage of seismic, engineering, and economic data sets, and is able to provide a reasonable after the event losses scenario. Data are not gathered for each single building and the intensity values are not a simple hazard indicator, but, notwithstanding its coarseness, this method ensures both robust and reproducible results. As the local property value is available throughout the Italian territory, the present loss assessment can be effortlessly repeated for any area, and may be quickly reproduced in case of future events, or used for predictive economic estimations.

[1]  A. Solari,et al.  Statistical evaluation of vulnerability and expected seismic damage of residential buildings in the Veneto-Friuli area (NE Italy) , 2008 .

[2]  瀬古 美喜,et al.  Earthquake risk and housing prices in Japan : evidence before and after massive earthquakes , 2009 .

[3]  P. Mouroux,et al.  Risk-Ue Project: An Advanced Approach to Earthquake Risk Scenarios With Application to Different European Towns , 2008 .

[4]  Pitilakis Kyriazis,et al.  Systemic Seismic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis for Buildings, Lifeline Networks and Infrastructures Safety Gain. SYNER-G Synthetic Document , 2013 .

[5]  B. Riley,et al.  EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY , 2009 .

[6]  F. Meroni,et al.  Damage risk and scenarios in the Veneto - Friuli area , 2008 .

[7]  Roberto Basili,et al.  Is blind faulting truly invisible? Tectonic-controlled drainage evolution in the epicentral area of the May 2012, Emilia-Romagna earthquake sequence (northern Italy) , 2012 .

[8]  Roberto Zoboli,et al.  Housing Market Response to 2012 Northern Italy Earthquake: The role of house quality and changing risk perception , 2016 .

[9]  Luigi Sorrentino,et al.  Failure of industrial structures induced by the Emilia (Italy) 2012 earthquakes , 2013 .

[10]  Domenico Liberatore,et al.  Guest editorial: The Emilia 2012 earthquakes, Italy , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[11]  Sonia Giovinazzi,et al.  The vulnerability assessment of current buildings by a macroseismic approach derived from the EMS-98 scale , 2007 .

[12]  Paolo Galli,et al.  The MCS macroseismic survey of the Emilia 2012 earthquakes , 2012 .

[13]  E. Reinoso,et al.  A Simplified Method for Vulnerability Assessment of Dwelling Buildings and Estimation of Damage Scenarios in Catalonia, Spain , 2006 .

[15]  Rui Pinho,et al.  Detailed assessment of structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock for loss assessment models , 2008 .

[16]  Carlo Meletti,et al.  The 2015 version of the Italian Parametric Earthquake Catalogue (CPTI15) , 2016 .

[18]  Mark Thayer,et al.  The Impact of Natural Hazards on Housing Values: The Loma Prieta Earthquake , 1993 .

[19]  Laura Scognamiglio,et al.  The 2012 Pianura Padana Emiliana seimic sequence: locations, moment tensors and magnitudes , 2012 .

[20]  Angelo Masi,et al.  Procedures and experiences in the post-earthquake usability evaluation of ordinary buildings , 2016 .

[21]  F. Meroni,et al.  Assessing Seismic Damage Through Stochastic Simulation of Ground Shaking: The Case of the 1998 Faial Earthquake (Azores Islands) , 2010 .

[22]  Juan de la Riva,et al.  Interpolation Routines Assessment in ALS-Derived Digital Elevation Models for Forestry Applications , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[23]  K. Pitilakis,et al.  Earthquake Disaster Scenario Prediction and Loss Modelling for Urban Areas , 2007 .

[24]  Romano Camassi,et al.  Looking for missing earthquake traces in the Ferrara-Modena plain: an update on historical seismicity , 2012 .

[25]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Why Have Housing Prices Gone Up? , 2005 .

[26]  Alex H. Barbat,et al.  Seismic hazard and risk scenarios for Barcelona, Spain, using the Risk-UE vulnerability index method , 2010 .

[27]  G. Grünthal European macroseismic scale 1998 : EMS-98 , 1998 .

[28]  Andrea Tertulliani,et al.  The Emilia 2012 sequence: a macroseismic survey , 2012 .

[29]  S. Lagomarsino,et al.  Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings , 2006 .

[30]  Mario Locati,et al.  CPTI15, the 2015 version of the Parametric Catalogue of Italian Earthquakes , 2016 .

[31]  M. Sambridge,et al.  Geophysical parametrization and interpolation of irregular data using natural neighbours , 1995 .

[32]  Lucas W. Davis The Effect of Power Plants on Local Housing Values and Rents , 2011, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[33]  Thalia Anagnos,et al.  Development of a National Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology , 1997 .

[34]  Roger M. W. Musson,et al.  The comparison of macroseismic intensity scales , 2010 .

[35]  Philippe Guéguen,et al.  Macroscale Vulnerability Assessment of Cities Using Association Rule Learning , 2014 .

[36]  Mustafa Erdik,et al.  Rapid Earthquake Loss Assessment After Damaging Earthquakes , 2011 .

[37]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Evaluating error associated with lidar-derived DEM interpolation , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[38]  Thomas Leduc,et al.  Seismic vulnerability assessment of urban environments in moderate-to-low seismic hazard regions using association rule learning and support vector machine methods , 2015, Natural Hazards.