A short review of history and technical advances in quantitative neuromuscular monitoring devices

Corresponding author Ki Tae Jung Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, 365 Pilmun-dearo, Donggu, Gwangju 61453, Korea Tel: +82-62-220-3223 Fax: +82-62-223-2333 E-mail: mdmole@chosun.ac.kr ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2486-9961 Anesthetic procedures using a neuromuscular blocking drug (NMBD) always have a potential risk of residual neuromuscular block (RNMB) associated with serious respiratory complications despite the use of reversal agents. Due to the risk of RNMB, neuromuscular monitoring is a very important tool for assessing patient safety. Recently, the importance of quantitative neuromuscular monitoring has been highlighted because of the advent of sugammadex, which determines dosage based on the degree of NMB. Neuromuscular monitoring, which has been used clinically since the 1970s, is an appropriate method for assessing the level of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) after the use of a NMBD during anesthesia. Although the basic principles have not changed considerably, recent technical advances in neuromuscular monitoring devices can help anesthesiologists with convenient quantitative neuromuscular monitoring to accurately evaluate the levels of NMB, choose an appropriate NMBD, and avoid RNMB. The recently released electromyography-based devices provide more accurate values than acceleromyography (AMG). Although AMG has a problem with overestimation, modern AMG devices with new three-dimensional technology overcome this limitation. Anesthesiologists should increase their knowledge of neuromuscular mechanisms and monitoring, including how to use the latest device for proper neuromuscular monitoring and patient safety. In this review, we have explored the short history of neuromuscular monitoring devices and the latest trends in technology development.

[1]  Wonjin Lee The latest trend in neuromuscular monitoring: return of the electromyography , 2021, Anesthesia and pain medicine.

[2]  J. Renew,et al.  Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Neuromuscular Blockade: What Are the Recommendations in the USA and Other Countries? , 2020, Current Anesthesiology Reports.

[3]  B. Nair,et al.  Counting train-of-four twitch response: comparison of palpation to mechanomyography, acceleromyography, and electromyography. , 2020, British journal of anaesthesia.

[4]  B. Nair,et al.  A comparison of a prototype electromyograph vs. a mechanomyograph and an acceleromyograph for assessment of neuromuscular blockade† , 2019, Anaesthesia.

[5]  R. Soto,et al.  Incidence, risk factors, and consequences of residual neuromuscular block in the United States: The prospective, observational, multicenter RECITE-US study. , 2019, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[6]  A. Dahan,et al.  Proposal for a Revised Classification of the Depth of Neuromuscular Block and Suggestions for Further Development in Neuromuscular Monitoring. , 2019, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[7]  M. Yamakage,et al.  Comparative Study of TOF-Cuff, a New Neuromuscular Blockade Monitor, and TOF-Watch, an Acceleromyography. , 2019, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[8]  A. Dahan,et al.  Comparison of the TOF-Cuff® monitor with electromyography and acceleromyography during recovery from neuromuscular block. , 2019, British journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  D. Corneci,et al.  Neuromuscular monitoring: an update , 2018, Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care.

[10]  G. Murphy Neuromuscular Monitoring in the Perioperative Period. , 2017, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[11]  S. Brull,et al.  Current Status of Neuromuscular Reversal and Monitoring: Challenges and Opportunities , 2017, Anesthesiology.

[12]  A. Galarneau,et al.  The RECITE Study: A Canadian Prospective, Multicenter Study of the Incidence and Severity of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade , 2015, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  M. R. Gätke,et al.  Premature awakening and underuse of neuromuscular monitoring in a registry of patients with butyrylcholinesterase deficiency. , 2015, British journal of anaesthesia.

[14]  S. Phillips,et al.  An Ipsilateral Comparison of Acceleromyography and Electromyography During Recovery from Nondepolarizing Neuromuscular Block Under General Anesthesia in Humans , 2013, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[15]  T. Loughnan,et al.  Overview of the Introduction of Neuromuscular Monitoring to Clinical Anaesthesia , 2013, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[16]  S. Phillips,et al.  A Survey of the Management of Neuromuscular Blockade Monitoring in Australia and New Zealand , 2013, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[17]  J. F. Lopez,et al.  Neuromuscular monitoring and its importance in neuromuscular blockade☆ , 2012 .

[18]  M. El-Orbany Objective monitoring of neuromuscular block should become the standard of care , 2009, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[19]  L. Skovgaard,et al.  Good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II: the Stockholm revision , 2007, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[20]  A. Kopman,et al.  Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: a meta-analysis. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.

[21]  T. Suzuki,et al.  Normalization of acceleromyographic train-of-four ratio by baseline value for detecting residual neuromuscular block. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[22]  A. F. Kopman Normalization of the acceleromyographic train‐of‐four fade ratio , 2005, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[23]  J. Cyriac,et al.  Acceleromyography vs. electromyography: an ipsilateral comparison of the indirectly evoked neuromuscular response to train‐of‐four stimulation , 2005, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[24]  L. Eriksson Evidence-based practice and neuromuscular monitoring: it's time for routine quantitative assessment. , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[25]  P. H. Hansen,et al.  A new nerve stimulator (Myotest). , 1980, British journal of anaesthesia.

[26]  H. H. Ali,et al.  Quantitative assessment of residual antidepolarizing block. II. , 1971, British Journal of Anaesthesia.

[27]  H. H. Ali,et al.  Quantitative assessment of residual antidepolarizing block. I. , 1971, British journal of anaesthesia.

[28]  H. H. Ali,et al.  Stimulus frequency in the detection of neuromuscular block in humans. , 1970, British journal of anaesthesia.

[29]  D. Roberts,et al.  Electromyography in the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis. , 1968, British Journal of Pharmacology.

[30]  W HUEGIN,et al.  [THE ROLE OF ANESTHESIA IN SURGICAL MORTALITY]. , 1965, Klinische Medizin; osterreichische Zeitschrift fur wissenschaftliche und praktische Medizin.

[31]  H. Churchill-Davidson A PORTABLE PERIPHERAL NERVE-STIMULATOR. , 1965, Anesthesiology.

[32]  H. Churchill-Davidson,et al.  The St. Thomas's Hospital nerve stimulator in the diagnosis of prolonged apnoea. , 1958, The Lancet.

[33]  H. Beecher,et al.  A study of the deaths associated with anesthesia and surgery: based on a study of 599, 548 anesthesias in ten institutions 1948-1952, inclusive. , 1954, Annals of surgery.

[34]  S. Thesleff An investigation of the muscle-relaxing action of succinyl-choline-iodide in man. , 1952, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.