A piece of the action: Modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors

The idea that the conceptual system draws on sensory and motor systems has received considerable experimental support in recent years. Whether the tight coupling between sensory-motor and conceptual systems is modulated by factors such as context or task demands is a matter of controversy. Here, we tested the context sensitivity of this coupling by using action verbs in three different types of sentences in an fMRI study: literal action, apt but non-idiomatic action metaphors, and action idioms. Abstract sentences served as a baseline. The result showed involvement of sensory-motor areas for literal and metaphoric action sentences, but not for idiomatic ones. A trend of increasing sensory-motor activation from abstract to idiomatic to metaphoric to literal sentences was seen. These results support a gradual abstraction process whereby the reliance on sensory-motor systems is reduced as the abstractness of meaning as well as conventionalization is increased, highlighting the context sensitive nature of semantic processing.

[1]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  The Neural Career of Sensory-motor Metaphors , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Randall Stilla,et al.  Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex , 2012, Brain and Language.

[3]  D. Swinney Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[4]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Processing Abstract Language Modulates Motor System Activity , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  L. Fadiga,et al.  Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[7]  A. Roepstorff,et al.  Motion verb sentences activate left posterior middle temporal cortex despite static context , 2005, Neuroreport.

[8]  M. Just,et al.  The neural bases of sentence comprehension: a fMRI examination of syntactic and lexical processing. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  G. Orban,et al.  Coding observed motor acts: different organizational principles in the parietal and premotor cortex of humans. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  On beyond mirror neurons: internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  Roel M. Willems,et al.  The Function of Words: Distinct Neural Correlates for Words Denoting Differently Manipulable Objects , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[13]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Activation of sensory-motor areas in sentence comprehension. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Comprehending Prehending: Neural Correlates of Processing Verbs with Motor Stems , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  S. Glucksberg The psycholinguistics of metaphor , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  R W Cox,et al.  Real‐time 3D image registration for functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  S. Shinkareva,et al.  Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: A meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Action selectivity in parietal and temporal cortex. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  Georg Goldenberg,et al.  The Neural Basis of Imitation is Body Part Specific , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Passingham,et al.  The Attentional Role of the Left Parietal Cortex: The Distinct Lateralization and Localization of Motor Attention in the Human Brain , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Perception, action, and word meanings in the human brain: the case from action verbs , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology , 1984 .

[23]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study , 2011, Brain and Language.

[24]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Cortical topography of human anterior intraparietal cortex active during visually guided grasping. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  L. Buxbaum Ideomotor Apraxia: a Call to Action , 2001, Neurocase.

[26]  Laurel J. Buxbaum,et al.  Deficits in Movement Planning and Intrinsic Coordinate Control in Ideomotor Apraxia , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  L. Tyler,et al.  Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  A new method for improving functional-to-structural MRI alignment using local Pearson correlation , 2009, NeuroImage.

[29]  Charles Wallis,et al.  Computation and cognition , 2003, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[30]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  Richard B. Dasher,et al.  Regularity in Semantic Change , 2002 .

[32]  Karen Emmorey,et al.  Modulation of BOLD Response in Motion-sensitive Lateral Temporal Cortex by Real and Fictive Motion Sentences , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Flexibility in embodied lexical‐semantic representations , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[34]  M. Brett,et al.  Actions Speak Louder Than Functions: The Importance of Manipulability and Action in Tool Representation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  R. Gibbs Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation , 2006 .

[36]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  The neural basis of tool use. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  When do you grasp the idea? MEG evidence for instantaneous idiom understanding , 2012, NeuroImage.

[38]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Where is the action? Action sentence processing in Parkinson's disease , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  G. Lakoff,et al.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[40]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects , 2004, NeuroImage.

[41]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[42]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Grasping Ideas with the Motor System: Semantic Somatotopy in Idiom Comprehension , 2009 .

[43]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Congruent Embodied Representations for Visually Presented Actions and Linguistic Phrases Describing Actions , 2006, Current Biology.

[44]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[45]  Daniel M. Corcos,et al.  Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: A meta-analysis , 2006, NeuroImage.

[46]  Keith A. Johnson,et al.  Cortical Hubs Revealed by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity: Mapping, Assessment of Stability, and Relation to Alzheimer's Disease , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Murray Grossman,et al.  Left Inferior Parietal Representations for Skilled Hand-Object Interactions: Evidence from Stroke and Corticobasal Degeneration , 2007, Cortex.

[48]  O. Sporns,et al.  Identification and Classification of Hubs in Brain Networks , 2007, PloS one.

[49]  W. Schneider,et al.  Perceptual Knowledge Retrieval Activates Sensory Brain Regions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  Ashwin G Ramayya,et al.  A DTI investigation of neural substrates supporting tool use. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  James W. Lewis,et al.  Lefties Get It Right When Hearing Tool Sounds , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Katie L. McMahon,et al.  Action word meaning representations in cytoarchitectonically defined primary and premotor cortices , 2008, NeuroImage.

[53]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[54]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions , 2012, Cortex.

[55]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  Page Widick,et al.  Functional–anatomical organization of predicate metaphor processing , 2008, Brain and Language.

[57]  Vittorio Gallese,et al.  Task related modulation of the motor system during language processing , 2008, Brain and Language.

[58]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[59]  R T Knight,et al.  Neural representations of skilled movement. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[60]  Brigitte Röder,et al.  Functional Rather than Effector-Specific Organization of Human Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  Laurel J. Buxbaum,et al.  Deficient internal models for planning hand–object interactions in apraxia , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[62]  David C. Van Essen,et al.  Application of Information Technology: An Integrated Software Suite for Surface-based Analyses of Cerebral Cortex , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[64]  Rutvik H. Desai,et al.  The neurobiology of semantic memory , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.