Bridge to nowhere: A retrospective single-center study on patients using chronic intravenous inotropic support as bridge therapy who do not receive surgical therapy

Background Many patients with advanced heart failure (HF) are administered chronic intravenous inotropic support (CIIS) as bridge to surgical therapy; some ultimately never receive surgery. We aimed to describe reasons patients “crossover” from CIIS as bridge therapy to palliative therapy, and compare end-of-life outcomes to patients initiated on CIIS as palliative therapy. Methods Single-institution, retrospective cohort study of patients on CIIS as bridge or palliative therapy between 2010 and 2016; data obtained through review of health records and multi-disciplinary selection meeting minutes, was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results Of 246 patients discharged on CIIS as bridge therapy, 37 (16%) (male n = 28, 76%; African American n = 22, 60%) ultimately never received surgery. 67 matched patients on CIIS as palliative therapy were included for analysis (male n = 47, 70%; African American n = 47, 70%). The most common reasons for “crossover” from CIIS as bridge therapy to palliative therapy were frailty (n = 10, 27%), cardiac arrest (n = 5, 13.5%), and progressive non-cardiac illnesses (n = 6, 16.2%). A similar percentage of patients in the bridge (n = 28, 76%) and palliative (n = 48, 72%) groups died outside the hospital (P=0.66); however, fewer bridge patients received hospice care compared to the palliative group (35% vs 69%, P < 0.001). Comparing patients who died in the hospital, bridge patients (n = 9; 100%) were more likely to die in the intensive care unit than palliative patients (n = 8; 42%) (P < 0.001). Conclusion Patients on CIIS as bridge therapy who do not ultimately receive surgical therapy “crossover” to palliative intention due to frailty, or development of or identification of serious illnesses. Nevertheless, these “bridge to nowhere” patients are less likely to receive palliative care or hospice and more likely to die in the intensive care unit than patients on CIIS as palliative therapy.

[1]  Koji Takeda,et al.  Withdrawal of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients with Capacity. , 2021, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[2]  S. Najjar,et al.  Chronic Intravenous Inotropic Support as Palliative Therapy and Bridge Therapy for Advanced Heart Failure Patients: A Single-Center Experience. , 2021, Journal of cardiac failure.

[3]  Francesca N. Delling,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. , 2021, Circulation.

[4]  P. Reese,et al.  End-of-Life Care among US Adults with ESKD in the United States Who Were Waitlisted or Received a Kidney Transplant, 2005-2014. , 2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[5]  A. Cheung,et al.  American Association for Thoracic Surgery/International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines on selected topics in mechanical circulatory support. , 2020, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  M. Maurer,et al.  Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy in Older Adults: Addressing Common Clinical Questions , 2019, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[7]  D. Volkert,et al.  Prevalence and overlap of sarcopenia, frailty, cachexia and malnutrition in older medical inpatients , 2019, BMC Geriatrics.

[8]  M. Dew,et al.  The 2018 ISHLT/APM/AST/ICCAC/STSW recommendations for the psychosocial evaluation of adult cardiothoracic transplant candidates and candidates for long-term mechanical circulatory support. , 2018, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[9]  L. Allen,et al.  Assessing Frailty in Patients Undergoing Destination Therapy Left Ventricular Assist Device: Observations from Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support , 2017, ASAIO journal.

[10]  J. Felius,et al.  Prospective Assessment of Frailty Using the Fried Criteria in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy. , 2017, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  G. Bhat,et al.  Cognitive function and left ventricular assist device implantation. , 2015, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[12]  M. Walsh,et al.  Advanced (stage D) heart failure: a statement from the Heart Failure Society of America Guidelines Committee. , 2015, Journal of cardiac failure.

[13]  M. Biddle,et al.  A report from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. , 2015, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[14]  M. Drazner,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Stuart Russell,et al.  Listing criteria for heart transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for the care of cardiac transplant candidates--2006. , 2006, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[16]  D. Mancini,et al.  Heart rhythm considerations in heart transplant candidates and considerations for ventricular assist devices: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines for the care of cardiac transplant candidates--2006. , 2006, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[17]  L. Fried,et al.  Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.