Drawing up the rules: Encouraging children's rule creation in interactive open-ended play

When children play games like tag or jump rope, they often combine generally accepted predefined rules with their own invented and negotiated rules. These rules also occur in play with interactive play objects. In this field, we research children's interactions with open-ended play designs that offer interaction opportunities to which children can attach their own meaning. In this paper, we focus on the different types of rules that are important in open-ended play: the interaction behavior rules developed by the designer and the created game rules invented by the users (children aged 4-8). We identify two relevant steps in between the intentions of the designers and the users: interpretation and improvisation. This knowledge extends existing communication-based models of design. Moreover, we present two design cases that illustrate how these steps lead to freedom and diversity in children's interaction with open-ended play objects and we discuss relevant implications for design.

[1]  Karl Bergström The implicit rules of board games: on the particulars of the lusory agreement , 2010, MindTrek.

[2]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Design Research: Methods and Perspectives , 2003 .

[3]  Katie Salen,et al.  Rules of play: game design fundamentals , 2003 .

[4]  R. Caillois,et al.  Man, Play and Games , 1958 .

[5]  John Rheinfrank,et al.  Design languages , 1996 .

[6]  Bernard Suits,et al.  The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia , 1978 .

[7]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  Play it our way: customization of game rules in children's interactive outdoor games , 2014, IDC.

[8]  Stephen Nachmanovitch,et al.  Free Play: Improvisation in Life and Art , 1990 .

[9]  Berry Eggen,et al.  GlowSteps - A Decentralized Interactive Play Environment for Open-Ended Play , 2013, Advances in Computer Entertainment.

[10]  Berry Eggen,et al.  Leaving room for improvisation: towards a design approach for open-ended play , 2013, IDC.

[11]  Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza,et al.  The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction , 2005 .

[12]  Clarisse Sieckenius deSouza The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction (Acting with Technology) , 2005 .

[13]  Claire O'Malley,et al.  Smart toys: brave new world? , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Representing Artefacts as Media: Modelling the Relationship Between Designer Intent and Consumer Experience , 2008 .

[15]  P. Gray Play as a Foundation for Hunter-Gatherer Social Existence. , 2009 .

[16]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[17]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Making Space for Voice: Technologies to Support Children’s Fantasy and Storytelling , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[18]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Product Semantics: Exploring the Symbolic Qualities of Form , 1984 .

[19]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[20]  Berry Eggen,et al.  DESIGNING FOR PLAYFUL EXPERIENCES IN OPEN-ENDED INTELLIGENT PLAY ENVIRONMENTS , 2012 .

[21]  Berry Eggen,et al.  Designing playful interactions for social interaction and physical play , 2010, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[22]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Scenario-based design: envisioning work and technology in system development: john wiley & sons , 1995 .

[23]  Linda De Valk,et al.  Wobble: Supporting Social Play through an Open-ended Play Environment , 2014 .