Top-Down Processing and Visual Reorientation Illusions in a Virtual Reality Environment

The role of top-down processing on the horizontal-vertical line length illusion was examined by means of an ambiguous room with dual visual verticals. In one of the test conditions, the subjects were cued to one of the two verticals and were instructed to cognitively reassign the apparent vertical to the cued orientation. When they have mentally adjusted their perception, two lines in a plus sign configuration appeared and the subjects had to evaluate which line was longer. The results showed that the line length appeared longer when it was aligned with the direction of the vertical currently perceived by the subject. This study provides a demonstration that top-down processing influences lower level visual processing mechanisms. In another test condition, the subjects had all perceptual cues available and the influence was even stronger.

[1]  Stella Christie,et al.  Four types of visual mental imagery processing in upright and tilted observers. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation; further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  I. Howard,et al.  Visually Induced Reorientation Illusions , 2001, Perception.

[4]  Stefan Glasauer,et al.  Perception of spatial orientation in microgravity , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[5]  Fred Mast,et al.  Perceived body position and the visual horizontal , 1996, Brain Research Bulletin.

[6]  Lawrence E Marks,et al.  Context effects in visual length perception: Role of ocular, retinal, and spatial location , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  D M Merfeld,et al.  Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration , 1999, Nature.

[8]  J. Guyot,et al.  Room Tilt Illusion as a Manifestation of Peripheral Vestibular Disorders , 2003, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[9]  C. Oman,et al.  M.I.T./Canadian vestibular experiments on the Spacelab-1 mission: 4. Space motion sickness: symptoms, stimuli, and predictability , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Mental Imagery of Visual Motion Modifies the Perception of Roll-Vection Stimulation , 2001, Perception.

[11]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Express attentional shifts , 1993, Vision Research.

[12]  H. Mittelstaedt.  The subjective vertical as a function of visual and extraretinal cues. , 1986, Acta psychologica.

[13]  Ian P Howard,et al.  The Contribution of Motion, the Visual Frame, and Visual Polarity to Sensations of Body Tilt , 1994, Perception.

[14]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[15]  Laurence R. Harris,et al.  HUMAN ORIENTATION IN PROLONGED WEIGHTLESSNESS (ISS HRF-E085) , 2001 .

[16]  Horst Mittelstaedt,et al.  The information processing structure of the subjective vertical. A cybernetic bridge between its psychophysics and its neurobiology , 1988 .

[17]  Missoni Eduard,et al.  Aviation space & environmental medicine , 2003 .

[18]  S M Kosslyn,et al.  Visual mental imagery interferes with allocentric orientation judgements. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[19]  Eckart Scheerer,et al.  Systemanalyse der optisch-vestibulären Interaktion bei der Wahrnehmung der Vertikalen , 1970 .

[20]  W. Levelt,et al.  Spatial reference in weightlessness: Perceptual factors and mental representations , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  K Koga.  Gravity cue has implicit effects on human behavior. , 2000, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[22]  L E Marks,et al.  Differential effects of stimulus context on perceived length: Implications for the horizontal-vertical illusion , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  W. Bles,et al.  Cognitive Suppression of Tilt Sensations during Linear Horizontal Self-Motion in the Dark , 2001, Perception.

[24]  James E. Zacher,et al.  The Role of Visual Cues in Microgravity Spatial Orientation , 2003 .