Growth Variation in a Naturally Established Population of Pinus Sylvestris

We studied the variation in growth of individual trees in a population of Pinus sylvestris near Zurich in relation to tree age, size, and local competition. This pop- ulation established naturally when the drainage pattern in a peat bog was altered after the Second World War. An unusual opportunity to study stand development was afforded when the trees were harvested in 1987 as part of a restoration program. All tree stumps were mapped, and growth since establishment was measured as cross-sectional area of wood in 5-yr intervals, using disks from the base of each tree. The distribution of cross-sectional area was lognormal over most of the period of growth. Size at the beginning of a time interval was the primary determinant of individual growth during that interval, but age and local competition also had significant effects. Younger, smaller trees were better fitted by an exponential growth model, whereas older, larger trees were better fitted by a Gompertz (sigmoidal) model. Some of the results were very different from previous studies: (1) The spatial distribution of trees was not significantly different from random. (2) Size variability decreased during the course of stand development, even though there was no self-thinning. This was because (3) the density of natural establishment was low, and competition, although clearly detectable, was still relatively weak and sym- metric after 45 yr of stand development. Thus, there was no "initial advantage" in com- petition, and the younger trees, which were still growing exponentially, were able to catch up with the older trees, whose relative growth rates were declining.

[1]  T. Miller,et al.  Local Density Variation may Mimic Effects of Asymmetric Competition on Plant Size Variability , 1989 .

[2]  J. Wilson,et al.  The effect of initial advantage on the course of plant competition , 1988 .

[3]  T. Kohyama,et al.  Patterns of Trunk Diameter, Tree Height and Crown Depth in Crowded Abies Stands , 1990 .

[4]  Gordon B. Bonan,et al.  Density Effects on the Size Structure of Annual Plant Populations: An Indication of Neighbourhood Competition , 1991 .

[5]  E. D. Ford,et al.  Competition and stand structure in some even-aged plant monocultures , 1975 .

[6]  John L. Harper,et al.  INTERFERENCE IN DUNE ANNUALS: SPATIAL PATTERN AND NEIGHBOURHOOD EFFECTS , 1977 .

[7]  Norman L. Christensen,et al.  Population Dynamics in Loblolly Pine Stands: Changes in Skewness and Size Inequality , 1989 .

[8]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  New Computer Models Unify Ecological TheoryComputer simulations show that many ecological patterns can be explained by interactions among individual organisms , 1988 .

[9]  P. J. Fonteyn,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE IN A DESERT PLANT COMMUNITY , 1981 .

[10]  D. Rabinowitz,et al.  Factors Affecting Frequency Distributions of Plant Mass: The Absence of Dominance and Suppression in Competing Monocultures of Festuca Paradoxa , 1983 .

[11]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[12]  M. Westoby Frequency Distributions of Plant Size during Competitive Growth of Stands: the Operation of Distribution-modifying Functions , 1982 .

[13]  J. Weiner,et al.  Growth and Variability in Crowded and Uncrowded Populations of Dwarf Marigolds (Tagetes patula) , 1990 .

[14]  D. Ehrhardt,et al.  Dominance and suppression, size-dependent growth and self-thinning in a natural Impatiens capensis population , 1987 .

[15]  John L. Harper,et al.  OCCUPATION OF BIOLOGICAL SPACE DURING SEEDLING ESTABLISHMENT , 1972 .

[16]  M. Huston Size Bimodality in Plant Populations an Alternative Hypothesis , 1986 .

[17]  E. Renshaw,et al.  The description of spatial pattern using two-dimensional spectral analysis , 1984, Vegetatio.

[18]  J. Burdon Plant population biology: edited by A.J. Davy, M.J. Hutchings and A.R. Watkinson, Blackwell Scientific Publications (28th Symposium of the British Ecological Society), 1988. £40.00 hbk (viii + 478 pages) ISBN 0 632 02349 X , 1989 .

[19]  G. Kitagawa,et al.  Akaike Information Criterion Statistics , 1988 .

[20]  O. T. Solbrig,et al.  STUDIES ON THE POPULATION BIOLOGY OF THE GENUS VIOLA. II. THE EFFECT OF PLANT SIZE ON FITNESS IN VIOLA SORORIA , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[21]  L. R. Benjamin,et al.  Sources of Variation and Measures of Variability in Even-aged Stands of Plants , 1986 .

[22]  P. Rothery,et al.  Competition Within Stands of Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta , 1984 .

[23]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[24]  P. West Inter-tree competition and small-scale pattern in monoculture of Eucalyptus obliqua L'Herit , 1984 .

[25]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Competition for Light in a Plant Monoculture Modelled as a Spatial Stochastic Process , 1981 .

[26]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Size variability and competition in plant monocultures , 1986 .

[27]  A. Ellison Density‐Dependent Dynamics of Salicornia Europaea Monocultures , 1987 .

[28]  Eugene S. Edgington,et al.  Randomization Tests , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[29]  T. Mitchell-Olds Analysis of Local Variation in Plant Size , 1987 .

[30]  J. Ogden Plant population structure and productivity. , 1970 .

[31]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Correlation and causality , 1979 .

[32]  N. C. Kenkel,et al.  Pattern of Self‐Thinning in Jack Pine: Testing the Random Mortality Hypothesis , 1988 .

[33]  M. S. Bartlett,et al.  The spectral analysis of two-dimensional point processes , 1964 .

[34]  D. Phillips,et al.  Competition and spacing patterns in desert shrubs , 1981 .

[35]  G. Evans,et al.  The quantitative analysis of plant growth , 1972 .

[36]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Including competitive asymmetry in measures of local interference in plant populations , 1989, Oecologia.