Ultrastructural differentiation of abnormal scars.

AIM To evaluate the differences between keloid and hypertrophic scars by biochemical and ultrastructural techniques. METHOD Over 1000 patients with different types of scars were studied and followed up for a period of 20 years. The histochemical and biochemical analysis with respect to the composition of the extracellular matrix of the dermis was conducted. At the ultrastructural level, collagen deposition and assembly were studied using electron microscopy. The rate of proliferation and metabolic activity of the dermal fibroblasts isolated from the normal skin and scar biopsies were studied to assess the cause of excess matrix deposition in scar tissues. RESULTS Evaluation of different types of scars showed that both keloid and hypertrophic scars have excess matrix deposition in terms of collagen and proteoglycans. Keloid shows a high amount of acid-soluble collagen. The assembly of collagen fibrils is also abnormal in keloids. Studies on the proliferation and metabolic activity showed that keloid fibroblasts have a higher rate of proliferation and metabolic activity than fibroblasts from hypertrophic scars and normal skin. Finally, keloid fibroblasts show high and intense staining for the endoplasmic reticulum, suggesting a possible reason for high activity of these fibroblasts. CONCLUSION Keloids and hypertrophic scars show distinct ultrastructural patterns of both collagen deposition and assembly. These parameters could be refined by further research, and they would thus serve as a useful tool for surgeons to distinguish different types of scars and adopt suitable therapeutic strategies.

[1]  Richard A.F. Clark,et al.  The Molecular and Cellular Biology of Wound Repair , 2012, Springer US.

[2]  A. Ghahary,et al.  Hypertrophic scars, keloids, and contractures. The cellular and molecular basis for therapy. , 1997, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[3]  R. Raghow,et al.  The role of extracellular matrix in postinflammatory wound healing and fibrosis , 1994, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[4]  Takeshi Hoshino,et al.  Correlation between negative staining pattern and hydrophobic residues of collagen. , 1986, Journal of electron microscopy.

[5]  D. Torchia,et al.  Preparation of intact monomeric collagen from rat tail tendon and skin and the structure of the nonhelical ends in solution. , 1976, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[6]  J. F. Woessner,et al.  The determination of hydroxyproline in tissue and protein samples containing small proportions of this imino acid. , 1961, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[7]  R. Diegelmann Cellular and biochemical aspects of normal and abnormal wound healing: an overview. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[8]  L. Suguna,et al.  Differentiation of keloid and hypertrophic scar; correlation of the water proton relaxation times with the duration of the scar. , 1993, Physiological chemistry and physics and medical NMR.

[9]  N. Chowdri,et al.  Evaluation of various methods of treating keloids and hypertrophic scars: a 10-year follow-up study. , 1992, British journal of plastic surgery.

[10]  S. Vijayasaradhi,et al.  Keratinization of rat vaginal epithelium. III. Effect of estradiol on keratinization , 1989, Biology of the cell.

[11]  E. J. Miller,et al.  Preparation and characterization of the different types of collagen. , 1982, Methods in enzymology.

[12]  L. A. Elson,et al.  A colorimetric method for the determination of glucosamine and chondrosamine. , 1933, The Biochemical journal.