Dynamic Parameter Estimation of Large Space Debris Based on Inertial and Visual Data Fusion

Most large space debris has large residual angular momentum, and the de-tumbling and capturing operation can easily cause instability and failure of tracking satellites. Therefore, it is necessary to perform real-time dynamic parameter identification of space debris prior to the imminent de-tumbling and capture operation, thus improving the efficiency and success of active debris removal (ADR) missions. A method for identifying dynamic parameters based on the fusion of visual and inertial data is proposed. To obtain the inertial data, the inertial measurement units (IMU) with light markers were fixed on the debris surface by space harpoon, which has been experimentally proven in space, and the binocular vision was placed at the front of a tracking satellite to obtain coordinates of the light markers. A novel method for denoising inertial data is proposed, which will eliminate the interference from the space environment. Furthermore, based on the denoised data and coordinates of the light markers, the mass-center location is estimated. The normalized angular momentum is calculated using the Euler–Poinsot motion characteristics, and all active debris removal parameters are determined. Simulations with Gaussian noise and experiments in the controlled laboratory have been conducted, the results indicate that this method can provide accurate dynamic parameters for the ADR mission.

[1]  François Chaumette,et al.  The active space debris removal mission RemoveDebris. Part 2: In orbit operations , 2020, Acta Astronautica.

[2]  G. Pucacco,et al.  Dynamical models and the onset of chaos in space debris , 2016, 1612.08849.

[3]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[4]  Ou Ma,et al.  A review of space robotics technologies for on-orbit servicing , 2014 .

[5]  Chong Sun,et al.  Adaptive space debris capture approach based on origami principle , 2019, International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems.

[6]  Richard T. Parmley,et al.  Payload and spacecraft technology for GP-B , 2000 .

[7]  D. Petri,et al.  Practical implementation of the spectrogram‐inverse Radon transform based algorithm for resident space objects parameter estimation , 2019, IET Science, Measurement & Technology.

[8]  John J. Leonard,et al.  Factor Graph Modeling of Rigid‐body Dynamics for Localization, Mapping, and Parameter Estimation of a Spinning Object in Space , 2015, J. Field Robotics.

[9]  M. Martorella,et al.  Experimental Comparison of Radon Domain Approaches for Resident Space Object’s Parameter Estimation , 2021, Sensors.

[10]  Zhao Pengyuan,et al.  Survey on research and development of on-orbit active debris removal methods , 2020, Science China Technological Sciences.

[11]  Sean Tuttle,et al.  Harpoon technology development for the active removal of space debris , 2015 .

[12]  Michèle Lavagna,et al.  Stereovision-based pose and inertia estimation of unknown and uncooperative space objects , 2017 .

[13]  Guglielmo S. Aglietti,et al.  RemoveDEBRIS: An in-orbit demonstration of technologies for the removal of space debris , 2019, The Aeronautical Journal.

[14]  Eberhard Gill,et al.  Review and comparison of active space debris capturing and removal methods , 2016 .

[15]  Ou Ma,et al.  Identification of all the inertial parameters of a non-cooperative object in orbit , 2019, Aerospace Science and Technology.

[16]  H. Kojima,et al.  Study on acceptable offsets of ejected nets from debris center for successful capture of debris , 2020 .

[17]  Kenneth Levenberg A METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF CERTAIN NON – LINEAR PROBLEMS IN LEAST SQUARES , 1944 .

[18]  Roberto Opromolla,et al.  Uncooperative pose estimation with a LIDAR-based system , 2015 .

[19]  François Chaumette,et al.  The active space debris removal mission RemoveDebris. Part 1: From concept to launch , 2020, Acta Astronautica.