This study evaluated the instructional benefits and barriers related to the use of online formative and summative assessment tools. Data were collected from samples of undergraduate students in different semesters to allow for differential use of summative assessment (paper versus online delivery). Formative assessment was manipulated by providing online practice quizzes that students could freely access to prepare for the course examinations. For the computer-based summative assessment sample, the quiz access was restricted to only the final two course exams. The impact of computer-based summative and formative assessments on test anxiety, perceptions of tests as threatening events, study skills, and exam performance was investigated. It was anticipated that those students who used the formative assessment quizzes frequently would have significantly higher scores than those who used the quizzes infrequently. These variations in performance could be attributed to group differences in willingness to use study materials and tools; therefore, control of the availability of quizzes was maintained in part of the study to allow for a baseline test, to ensure that differences observed in performance across groups of students using the quizzes could be more confidently attributed to formative assessment use. The online summative tool was anticipated to have no strong impact on the level of anxiety, emotionality, or perceived level of threat posed by the tests. The expectation was that students would hold similar ratings of these affective constructs, regardless of test format. Data support providing online formative and summative assessments in undergraduate courses. Although the data do not allow for declaration that the formative assessment tools decrease cognitive test anxiety, there are relevant gains in course examination performance based on use of the quizzes, particularly for the group of students taking summative assessment tests online. Furthermore, the data demonstrated that there were no disadvantages to using online summative assessment regarding anxiety, emotionality, or study behaviors, and there was actually an advantage in the domain of perceived threat imposed by the impending test. (Contains 23 references.) (AEF) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. 1 The Effects of InternetBased Formative and Summative Assessment on Test Anxiety, Perceptions of Threat, and Achievement Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association April 12 2001, Seattle WA Jerrell C. Cassady' Judey Budenz-Anders Department of Educational Psychology Ball State University Gary Pavlechko Wayne Mock Center for Teaching Technology Ball State University PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
[1]
C. Holahan,et al.
Test anxiety and academic performance: the effects of study-related behaviors.
,
1980,
Journal of educational psychology.
[2]
Steven L. Wise,et al.
Providing Item Feedback in Computer-Based Tests: Effects of Initial Success and Failure
,
1989
.
[3]
Jerrell C. Cassady,et al.
Cognitive Test Anxiety and Academic Performance
,
2002
.
[4]
J. Harackiewicz,et al.
Test Anxiety, Self-Awareness, and Cognitive Interference: A Process Analysis
,
1995
.
[5]
A. Elliot,et al.
Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation.
,
1999,
Journal of personality and social psychology.
[6]
B. C. Wittmaier.
Test Anxiety and Study Habits
,
1972
.
[7]
T. Gjesme.
Worry and Emotionality Components of Test Anxiety in Relation to Situational and Personality Determinants
,
1983,
Psychological reports.
[8]
Mark A. Davis,et al.
Cognitive and emotional components of anxiety: literature review and a revised worry-emotionality scale.
,
1981,
Journal of educational psychology.
[9]
Ralph R. Behnke,et al.
Technology-Based Instructional Feedback Intervention.
,
1999
.
[10]
Wilbert J. McKeachie,et al.
Does anxiety disrupt information processing or does poor information processing lead to anxiety
,
1984
.
[11]
R. Hembree.
Correlates, Causes, Effects, and Treatment of Test Anxiety
,
1988
.
[12]
H. M. van der Ploeg,et al.
Cognition, Study Habits, Test Anxiety, and Academic Performance
,
1994,
Psychological reports.
[13]
W. McKeachie,et al.
Two types of test-anxious students: support for an information processing model
,
1987
.
[14]
M. Naveh-Benjamin.
A Comparison of Training Programs Intended for Different Types of Test-Anxious Students: Further Support for an Information-Processing Model.
,
1991
.
[15]
D. Zohar.
An Additive Model of Test Anxiety: Role of Exam-Specific Expectations.
,
1998
.
[16]
Paul A. Schutz,et al.
Emotions and Self-Regulation During Test Taking
,
2000
.
[17]
J. Clark,et al.
Feedback, Test Anxiety and Performance in a College Course
,
1998,
Psychological reports.
[18]
Tom Buchanan.
Using the World Wide Web for Formative Assessment
,
1998
.
[19]
Terri Jongekrijg,et al.
Alternative Techniques for Providing Feedback to Students and Trainees: A Literature Review with Guidelines.
,
1999
.
[20]
The effects of item feedback and examinee control on test performance and anxiety in a computer-administered test
,
1986
.
[21]
N. Milgram,et al.
Situational and Personal Determinants of Academic Procrastination
,
1992
.