Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance

Multiple cues contribute to the visual perception of an object's distance from the observer. The manner in which the nervous system combines these various cues is of considerable interest. Although it is accepted that image cues play a significant role in distance perception, controversy exists regarding the use of kinaesthetic information about the eyes' state of convergence. We used a perturbation technique to explore the contribution of vergence to visually based distance estimates as a function of both fixation distance and the availability of retinal information. Our results show that the nervous system increases the weighting given to vergence as (i) fixation distance becomes closer; and (ii) the available retinal image cues decrease. We also identified the presence of a strong contraction bias when distance cues were studied in isolation, but we argue that such biases do not suggest that vergence provides an ineffectual signal for near–space perception.

[1]  J. M. Foley Binocular distance perception. , 1980, Psychological review.

[2]  M. Landy,et al.  A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues , 1993, Vision Research.

[3]  WALTER C. GOGEL,et al.  Absolute motion parallax and the specific distal 1 , 1973 .

[4]  M. Landy,et al.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion , 1995, Vision Research.

[5]  M F Bradshaw,et al.  Disparity Scaling and the Perception of Frontoparallel Surfaces , 1995, Perception.

[6]  E. Johnston Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis , 1991, Vision Research.

[7]  B. Baldwin,et al.  The behavioural physiology of animals and man , 1976 .

[8]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Some Recent Studies on the Extraretinal Contribution to Distance Perception , 1999, Perception.

[9]  G P Bingham,et al.  The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  E. Brenner,et al.  Judging distance from ocular convergence , 1998, Vision Research.

[11]  Harold Alfred Swenson,et al.  The Relative Influence of Accommodation and Convergence in the Judgment of Distance , 1932 .

[12]  L. R. Young,et al.  Manual control of yaw motion with combined visual and vestibular cues , 1977 .

[13]  W C Gogel,et al.  Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance. , 1972, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985 .

[15]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visually perceiving distance: a comment on Shebilske, Karmiohl, and Proffitt (1983). , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  D. Massaro Ambiguity in perception and experimentation. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.