Exploration of using thermally responsive polyionic liquid hydrogels as draw agents in forward osmosis

Thermally responsive hydrogels based on ionic liquid monomers of tetrabutylphosphonium p-styrenesulfonate (P4444 SS) and tributylhexylphosphonium p-styrenesulfonate (P4446 SS) were prepared by bulk polymerization in the presence of a crosslinker, and explored as draw agents in forward osmosis for the first time. Unlike traditional copolymer hydrogels from N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAm) and sodium acrylate (SA) or sodium 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonate (AMPS), the combination of thermo-sensitivity and the ionic nature in the hydrogel was achieved by subtle structure design of the ionic liquid monomers. These polyionic liquid hydrogels were proved to be able to generate a reasonable water flux from brackish water, and effectively release the desalinated water at temperatures above their Lower Critical Solution Temperature (LCST). In addition, a set of rational criteria for assessing responsive hydrogel draw agents was proposed, for the first time, to improve the hydrogels' comprehensive performance. Our studies revealed that, both intrinsic factors including hydrogel structure, membrane structure and hydrogel particle–particle contact conditions as well as extrinsic parameters such as the hydrogel's area density on the membrane and FO–regeneration cycle duration, would have a profound impact on the desalination efficacy using hydrogels.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  Toyoichi Tanaka,et al.  Volume‐phase transitions of ionized N‐isopropylacrylamide gels , 1987 .

[3]  Jaeyoung Lee,et al.  Role of Bound Water and Hydrophobic Interaction in Phase Transition of Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) Aqueous Solution , 2003 .

[4]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[5]  M. Wilhelm,et al.  A Novel Approach for the Desalination of Seawater by Means of Reusable Poly(acrylic acid) Hydrogels and Mechanical Force. , 2010, Macromolecular rapid communications.

[6]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: Fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents , 2010 .

[7]  Darren Delai Sun,et al.  A low-energy forward osmosis process to produce drinking water , 2011 .

[8]  Rong Wang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes , 2011 .

[9]  Dan Li,et al.  Composite polymer hydrogels as draw agents in forward osmosis and solar dewatering , 2011 .

[10]  Dan Li,et al.  Stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a new class of draw agent for forward osmosis desalination. , 2011, Chemical communications.

[11]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[12]  Laura Chekli,et al.  A review of draw solutes in forward osmosis process and their use in modern applications , 2012 .

[13]  Amir Razmjou,et al.  Fast deswelling of nanocomposite polymer hydrogels via magnetic field-induced heating for emerging FO desalination. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Yufeng Cai,et al.  CO2 switchable dual responsive polymers as draw solutes for forward osmosis desalination. , 2013, Chemical communications.

[15]  Xianmao Lu,et al.  Thermoresponsive magnetic nanoparticles for seawater desalination. , 2013, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[16]  Qingchun Ge,et al.  Hydroacid complexes: a new class of draw solutes to promote forward osmosis (FO) processes. , 2013, Chemical communications.

[17]  Amir Razmjou,et al.  Effect of particle size on the performance of forward osmosis desalination by stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a draw agent , 2013 .

[18]  Rong Wang,et al.  Towards temperature driven forward osmosis desalination using Semi-IPN hydrogels as reversible draw agents. , 2013, Water research.

[19]  Ahmed Aidan,et al.  Copper sulfate as draw solute in forward osmosis desalination , 2013 .

[20]  Mark L. Stone,et al.  SWITCHABLE POLARITY SOLVENTS AS DRAW SOLUTES FOR FORWARD OSMOSIS , 2013 .

[21]  Tom Depuydt,et al.  Forward and pressure retarded osmosis: potential solutions for global challenges in energy and water supply. , 2013, Chemical Society reviews.

[22]  Rong Wang,et al.  Significantly enhanced water flux in forward osmosis desalination with polymer-graphene composite hydrogels as a draw agent , 2013 .

[23]  Amir Razmjou,et al.  Bifunctional polymer hydrogel layers as forward osmosis draw agents for continuous production of fresh water using solar energy. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  D. Diamond,et al.  Thermoresponsive poly(ionic liquid) hydrogels. , 2013, Chemical communications.

[25]  Luuk C. Rietveld,et al.  Zwitterions as alternative draw solutions in forward osmosis for application in wastewater reclamation , 2014 .

[26]  Peng Wang,et al.  Na⁺-functionalized carbon quantum dots: a new draw solute in forward osmosis for seawater desalination. , 2014, Chemical communications.

[27]  Huanting Wang,et al.  Response to osmotic pressure versus swelling pressure: comment on "bifunctional polymer hydrogel layers as forward osmosis draw agents for continuous production of fresh water using solar energy". , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Shuaifei Zhao,et al.  Osmotic pressure versus swelling pressure: comment on "bifunctional polymer hydrogel layers as forward osmosis draw agents for continuous production of fresh water using solar energy". , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Daichi Nakayama,et al.  Lower critical solution temperature (LCST) phase separation of glycol ethers for forward osmotic control. , 2014, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[30]  Peiyi Wu,et al.  Unusual thermal phase transition behavior of an ionic liquid and poly(ionic liquid) in water with significantly different LCST and dynamic mechanism , 2014 .

[31]  J. Gutmann,et al.  Design of Thermally Responsive Polymeric Hydrogels for Brackish Water Desalination: Effect of Architecture on Swelling, Deswelling, and Salt Rejection. , 2015, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[32]  Fenglin Yang,et al.  Forward osmosis using electric-responsive polymer hydrogels as draw agents: Influence of freezing–thawing cycles, voltage, feed solutions on process performance , 2015 .

[33]  Tian C. Zhang,et al.  Magnetic thermoresponsive ionic nanogels as novel draw agents in forward osmosis , 2015 .

[34]  Bo Jin,et al.  Functionalized thermo-responsive microgels for high performance forward osmosis desalination. , 2015, Water research.