Individuals’ Evaluations of and Attitudes Towards Potentially Uncanny Robots

In the present work we provide an overview and categorization of explanatory approaches for the uncanny valley effect and present an empirical study. Against the background of the uncanny valley hypothesis, the study utilized qualitative interviews in which participants were presented with pictures and videos of potentially uncanny humanoid and android robots to explore participants’ evaluations of very human-like robots, their attitudes about these robots, and their emotional reactions towards these robots. In this regard, the influence of the robots’ appearance, movement and the context of HRI were examined. Results showed that, contrasting the hypothesis, participants reported not only negative, but also positive emotional reactions towards the possibly uncanny robots. The robots’ appearance was of great importance for the participants, because certain characteristics were equalized with certain abilities, merely human appearance without a connected functionality was not appreciated, and human rules of attractiveness were applied to the android robots. The analysis also demonstrated the importance of the robots’ movements and the social context they were placed in. The importance of two possible causes and explanations of the uncanny valley, namely uncertainty at category boundaries (cf. Ramey in Proceedings of views of the uncanny valley workshop: IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, 2005; Proceedings of the ICCS/CogSci-2006 long symposium “Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science”, 2006) and subconscious fears of being replaced (cf. MacDorman & Ishiguro in Interact Stud 7(3):297–337, 2006) were explored in this work. On this reflective level of evaluation we found some support for the assumptions that participants experienced uncertainty how to categorize android robots (as human or machine) and that some (but not all) participants felt uncomfortable at the thought to be replaced by robots.

[1]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Gender Representation and Humanoid Robots Designed for Domestic Use , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[2]  N. Sharkey,et al.  The crying shame of robot nannies: An ethical appraisal , 2010 .

[3]  P. Rozin,et al.  Individual Differences in Disgust Sensitivity: Comparisons and Evaluations of Paper-and-Pencil versus Behavioral Measures , 1999 .

[4]  T. Kanda,et al.  Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots , 2006 .

[5]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  People's assumptions about robots: investigation of their relationships with attitudes and emotions toward robots , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[6]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  My robotic doppelgänger - a critical look at the Uncanny Valley , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[7]  A. Fallon,et al.  A perspective on disgust. , 1987, Psychological review.

[8]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[10]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[11]  Tanya N. Beran,et al.  Understanding how children understand robots: Perceived animism in child-robot interaction , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  L. Jäncke,et al.  The Human Likeness Dimension of the “Uncanny Valley Hypothesis”: Behavioral and Functional MRI Findings , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[13]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Androids as an Experimental Apparatus: Why Is There an Uncanny Valley and Can We Exploit It? , 2005 .

[14]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  How design characteristics of robots determine evaluation and uncanny valley related responses , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Noel Sharkey,et al.  The Ethical Frontiers of Robotics , 2008, Science.

[16]  David Hanson Exploring the Aesthetic Range for Humanoid Robots , 2006 .

[17]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Is The Uncanny Valley An Uncanny Cliff? , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[18]  M. Schaller,et al.  The Behavioral Immune System (and Why It Matters) , 2011 .

[19]  R. J. B. The Child's Conception of the World , 1929, Nature.

[20]  Sarah N. Woods,et al.  The design space of robots: investigating children's views , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[21]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Development of an android robot for studying human-robot interaction , 2004 .

[22]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[23]  E. Jentsch On the psychology of the uncanny (1906) 1 , 1997 .

[24]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  What People Assume about Humanoid and Animal-Type Robots: Cross-Cultural Analysis between Japan, Korea, and the United States , 2008, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[25]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[26]  KandaTakayuki,et al.  The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots , 2006 .

[27]  Nikolaos Mavridis,et al.  Opinions and attitudes toward humanoid robots in the Middle East , 2011, AI & SOCIETY.

[28]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[29]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Interactive humanoids and androids as ideal interfaces for humans , 2005, ICMI '05.

[30]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  The Uncanny Valley [From the Field] , 2012, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[31]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Human emotion and the uncanny valley: A GLM, MDS, and Isomap analysis of robot video ratings , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[32]  K. MacDorman,et al.  Subjective Ratings of Robot Video Clips for Human Likeness, Familiarity, and Eeriness: An Exploration of the Uncanny Valley , 2006 .

[33]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Composition and Evaluation of the Humanlike Motions of an Android , 2006, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[34]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge" in the psychology of computer vision , 1975 .

[35]  K. Crowley,et al.  Searching for Signs of Intelligent Life: An Investigation of Young Children's Beliefs About Robot Intelligence , 2008 .

[36]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Toward social mechanisms of android science , 2006 .

[37]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Who like androids more: Japanese or US Americans? , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[38]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Experimental investigation of relationships between anxiety, negative attitudes, and allowable distance of robots , 2007 .

[39]  Charles R. Crowell,et al.  Robot social presence and gender: Do females view robots differently than males? , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[40]  N. Sharkey,et al.  An ethical appraisal , 2010 .

[41]  H. Brenton,et al.  The Uncanny Valley : does it exist ? , 2005 .

[42]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures , 2008, AI & SOCIETY.

[43]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Mortality salience and the uncanny valley , 2005, 5th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2005..

[44]  Guy L. Lacroix,et al.  Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  H. Ishiguro,et al.  The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research , 2006 .

[46]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[47]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[48]  W. Ickes Empathic Accuracy , 2005 .

[49]  K. Krippendorff Krippendorff, Klaus, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980. , 1980 .

[50]  Sven Wachsmuth,et al.  What can I do for you? Appearance and Application of Robots , 2007 .

[51]  M. Scopelliti,et al.  If I had a Robot at Home... Peoples’ Representation of Domestic Robots , 2004 .

[52]  Marcus Cheetham,et al.  Category Processing and the human likeness dimension of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis: Eye-Tracking Data , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[53]  Heather E. Gary,et al.  Children's Social Relationships With Current and Near‐Future Robots , 2013 .

[54]  Brian T. Gill,et al.  "Robovie, you'll have to go into the closet now": children's social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[55]  Nikolaos MavridisMarina-Selini Opinions and attitudes toward humanoid robots in the Middle East , 2012 .

[56]  Jun'ichiro Seyama,et al.  The Uncanny Valley: Effect of Realism on the Impression of Artificial Human Faces , 2007, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[57]  Randolph M. Nesse,et al.  Natural selection and the regulation of defenses: A signal detection analysis of the smoke detector principle. , 2004 .

[58]  S. Gelman,et al.  Robots and rodents: children's inferences about living and nonliving kinds. , 2007, Child development.

[59]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  In Search of the Uncanny Valley , 2009, UCMedia.

[60]  Kazuhiko Kawamura,et al.  Uncanny valley revisited , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[61]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Measurement of Anxiety toward Robots , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[62]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.