Impact of capacity flexibility on the use of booking limits

Abstract Many firms that practice revenue management via booking limits possess a certain level of capacity flexibility, which enables them to adjust capacity in response to revealed information on demand. This paper examines how the flexibility in capacity – including upside flexibility, downside flexibility, and timing flexibility – affects the optimal booking limits for different customer segments and the benefit of using booking-limit control. We first analyze a static case where low-price customers make bookings before high-price customers, and then study a dynamic case where customers of different segments may make bookings in any order. In both cases, we find that having more upside flexibility in capacity can increase and decrease the benefit of booking-limit control, whereas having more downside flexibility always increases the benefit of booking-limit control. We also find that as the time to make capacity adjustment is postponed from the beginning to the end of the booking horizon (i.e., more timing flexibility), the optimal booking limits for lower-price segments first increase then decrease. Moreover, it is shown that the marginal values of building more upside and downside flexibility into capacity are affected by the use of booking limits.

[1]  J. V. Mieghem,et al.  Mix, Time, and Volume Flexibility: Valuation and Corporate Diversification , 2012 .

[2]  P. Belobaba,et al.  Demand driven dispatch and revenue management in a competitive network environment , 2016 .

[3]  Ioana Popescu,et al.  Media Revenue Management with Audience Uncertainty: Balancing Upfront and Spot Market Sales , 2010, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[4]  Douglas R. Bish,et al.  Revenue management with aircraft reassignment flexibility , 2011 .

[5]  Tatsiana Levina,et al.  Network Cargo Capacity Management , 2011, Oper. Res..

[6]  Matthew E. Berge,et al.  Demand Driven Dispatch: A Method for Dynamic Aircraft Capacity Assignment, Models and Algorithms , 1993, Oper. Res..

[7]  Serguei Netessine,et al.  Revenue Management Games: Horizontal and Vertical Competition , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Manu Goyal,et al.  Volume Flexibility, Product Flexibility, or Both: The Role of Demand Correlation and Product Substitution , 2011, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[9]  Peter Belobaba,et al.  OR Practice - Application of a Probabilistic Decision Model to Airline Seat Inventory Control , 1989, Oper. Res..

[10]  Dong Li,et al.  Dynamic booking control for car rental revenue management: A decomposition approach , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  A. Raturi,et al.  Sources of volume flexibility and their impact on performance , 2002 .

[12]  Steven Kou,et al.  Revenue Management of Callable Products , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Sirong Luo,et al.  Two-dimensional cargo overbooking models , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Ioana Popescu,et al.  Pricing and Revenue Management: The Value of Coordination , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Shaler Stidham,et al.  The Underlying Markov Decision Process in the Single-Leg Airline Yield-Management Problem , 1999, Transp. Sci..

[16]  K. Littlewood. Special Issue Papers: Forecasting and control of passenger bookings , 2005 .

[17]  Jinxing Xie,et al.  Duopoly game of callable products in airline revenue management , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  Christiane Barz Risk-Averse Capacity Control in Revenue Management , 2007 .

[19]  Izak Duenyas,et al.  Dynamic Pricing of Substitutable Products in the Presence of Capacity Flexibility , 2012, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[20]  Janakiram Subramanian,et al.  Airline Yield Management with Overbooking, Cancellations, and No-Shows , 1999, Transp. Sci..

[21]  D. Gupta Flexible carrier–forwarder contracts for air cargo business , 2008 .

[22]  Amelia C. Regan,et al.  Dynamic yield management when aircraft assignments are subject to swap , 2006 .

[23]  Antonio Moreno,et al.  Pricing and Production Flexibility: An Empirical Analysis of the U.S. Automotive Industry , 2015, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..