Dynamic Angular Three-Dimensional Measurement of Multisegmental Thoracolumbar Motion In Vivo

Study Design. Method validation and in vivo motion segment study. Objective. To determine in healthy subjects in vivo intervertebral segmental kinematics and coupled motion behavior in all 3 planes simultaneously for 3 segments and to evaluate whether these results differ from those in the normal population according to the literature. Summary of Background Data. Few studies have provided a direct invasive approach to investigate segmental kinematics in vivo. Dynamic recordings of 3-dimensional segmental motion patterns of adjacent segments have rarely been reported. To date, no studies have examined the 3-dimensional segmental movements of the thoracolumbar junction in vivo in detail. Methods. K-wires were inserted into the Th11, Th12, L1, and L2 spinous processes of 21 healthy subjects. Ultrasound markers and sensors were attached to the k-wires. Real-time motion data were recorded during standardized ranging exercises. Errors caused by the k-wires, and the static and dynamic accuracy of the system, were considered. Results. Large intersubject variation was found in all of the exercises. The average ranges of motion from Th11 to L2 were 18.7° for flexion-extension, 13.5° for one-sided lateral bending, and 1.8° for one-sided axial rotation. Coupled-motion patterns among the subjects showed a coupled flexion in active lateral bending and a coupled extension in active rotation, but the results were inconsistent for active extension and flexion. Conclusion. This method offered accurate multisegmental dynamic-recording facilities. The dynamic exercises showed high reproducibility. The ranges of motion for extension/flexion and lateral bending differed from those reported in previous studies. The coupling patterns were only partly consistent because of large interindividual variation. The measurement error was comparable with that of other invasive methods.

[1]  D. Brunt,et al.  Relationship of the pelvic angle to the sacral angle: measurement of clinical reliability and validity. , 1994, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[2]  P. Hax,et al.  Operative Behandlung von Verletzungen des thorakolumbalen Übergangs , 1999, Der Unfallchirurg.

[3]  J. Morris,et al.  An in vivo study of axial rotation and immoblization at the lumbosacral joint. , 1968, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  J. Suni,et al.  Correlation Between Mobility Restrictions and Radiologic Changes in Ankylosing Spondylitis , 1995, Spine.

[5]  M. Aebi,et al.  A New Technique for Measuring Lumbar Segmental Motion In Vivo: Method, Accuracy, and Preliminary Results , 1997, Spine.

[6]  V. Goel,et al.  In vivo kinematics of the cervical spine. Part I: Development of a roentgen stereophotogrammetric technique using metallic markers and assessment of its accuracy. , 1993, Journal of spinal disorders.

[7]  Thomas R Oxland,et al.  Three-Dimensional Motion Patterns During Active Bending in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain , 2002, Spine.

[8]  Y. Fujikawa,et al.  Transforming growth factor-beta induces osteoclast formation in the absence of RANKL. , 2004, Bone.

[9]  A M Bull,et al.  Measuring spinal motion in rowers: the use of an electromagnetic device. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  G. Andersson,et al.  In Vivo Measurements of Lumbar Segmental Motion During Axial Rotation in Asymptomatic and Chronic Low Back Pain Male Subjects , 2007, Spine.

[11]  M. Panjabi,et al.  How Does Posture Affect Coupling in the Lumbar Spine? , 1989, Spine.

[12]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Clinical Validation of Functional Flexion‐Extension Roentgenograms of the Lumbar Spine , 1991, Spine.

[13]  D. B. Lucas,et al.  An in vivo study of the axial rotation of the human thoracolumbar spine. , 1967, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  M. Parnianpour,et al.  Range of Motion and Lordosis of the Lumbar Spine: Reliability of Measurement and Normative Values , 2001, Spine.

[15]  M M Panjabi,et al.  The Effect of Injury on Rotational Coupling at the Lumbosacral Joint: A Biomechanical Investigation , 1992, Spine.

[16]  T. R. Garrett,et al.  Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion--comparison of three methods. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[17]  M. Panjabi,et al.  An Analysis of Errors in Kinematic Parameters Associated with in Vivo Functional Radiographs , 1992, Spine.

[18]  J. Cholewicki,et al.  Effects of Posture and Structure on Three‐Dimensional Coupled Rotations in the Lumbar Spine: A Biomechanical Analysis , 1996, Spine.

[19]  M. Pearcy,et al.  Axial rotation and lateral bending in the normal lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional radiography. , 1984, Spine.

[20]  P Brinckmann,et al.  Precision measurement of segmental motion from flexion-extension radiographs of the lumbar spine. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  W. Hutton,et al.  Axial Rotation of the Lumbar Spine and the Effect of Flexion: An in Vitro and in Vivo Biomechanical Study , 1991, Spine.

[22]  S. GRACOVETSKY,et al.  Analysis of Spinal and Muscular Activity During Flexion/Extension and Free Lifts , 1990, Spine.

[23]  Christopher M Powers,et al.  Assessment of lumbar spine kinematics using dynamic MRI: a proposed mechanism of sagittal plane motion induced by manual posterior-to-anterior mobilization. , 2004, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[24]  I. Stokes,et al.  Assessment of Patients With Low-Back Pain by Biplanar Radiographic Measurement of Intervertebral Motion , 1981, Spine.

[25]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Analysis of role of bone compliance on mechanics of a lumbar motion segment. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[26]  A K Burton,et al.  Continuous measurement of lumbar posture using flexible electrogoniometers. , 1994, Ergonomics.

[27]  S D Walter,et al.  Errors in kinematic parameters of a planar joint: guidelines for optimal experimental design. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  L Susak,et al.  Diurnal Changes in the Profile Shape and Range of Motion of the Back , 1992, Spine.

[29]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Functional Radiographic Diagnosis of the Lumbar Spine: Flexion—Extension and Lateral Bending , 1991, Spine.

[30]  M. Pearcy,et al.  Twisting Mobility of the Human Back in Flexed Postures , 1993, Spine.

[31]  J. Nijboer,et al.  Thoracolumbar spinal fractures: segmental range of motion after dorsal spondylodesis in 82 patients: a prospective study , 2002, European Spine Journal.

[32]  M. Pearcy Stereo radiography of lumbar spine motion. , 1985, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[33]  J. Cassidy,et al.  Radiologic Diagnosis of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Instability , 1985, Spine.

[34]  J M Stevenson,et al.  Relative Lumbar and Pelvic Motion During Loaded Spinal Flexion/Extension , 1995, Spine.

[35]  H. Alaranta,et al.  Flexibility of the spine: normative values of goniometric and tape measurements. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[36]  M J Pearcy,et al.  Movements of the lumbar spine measured by three-dimensional X-ray analysis. , 1982, Journal of biomedical engineering.