A comparison of different Gabor feature extraction approaches for mass classification in mammography

We investigate the performance of six different approaches for directional feature extraction for mass classification problem in digital mammograms. These techniques use a bank of Gabor filters to extract the directional textural features. Directional textural features represent structural properties of masses and normal tissues in mammograms at different orientations and frequencies. Masses and micro-calcifications are two early signs of breast cancer which is a major leading cause of death in women. For the detection of masses, segmentation of mammograms results in regions of interest (ROIs) which not only include masses but suspicious normal tissues as well (which lead to false positives during the discrimination process). The problem is to reduce the false positives by classifying ROIs as masses and normal tissues. In addition, the detected masses are required to be further classified as malignant and benign. The feature extraction approaches are evaluated over the ROIs extracted from MIAS database. Successive Enhancement Learning based weighted Support Vector Machine (SELwSVM) is used to efficiently classify the generated unbalanced datasets. The average accuracy ranges from 68 to 100 % as obtained by different methods used in our paper. Comparisons are carried out based on statistical analysis to make further recommendations.

[1]  A. K. Barros,et al.  Classification of breast tissue in mammograms using efficient coding , 2011, Biomedical engineering online.

[2]  Zohreh Azimifar,et al.  Contourlet-based mammography mass classification using the SVM family , 2010, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[3]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[4]  Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva,et al.  Detection of masses in mammogram images using CNN, geostatistic functions and SVM , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[5]  Geraldo Braz Junior,et al.  Classification of breast tissues using Moran's index and Geary's coefficient as texture signatures and SVM. , 2009, Computers in biology and medicine.

[6]  Xinbo Gao,et al.  A Feature Analysis Approach to Mass Detection in Mammography Based on RF-SVM , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[7]  S. García,et al.  An Extension on "Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets" for all Pairwise Comparisons , 2008 .

[8]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Nicolai Petkov,et al.  Comparison of texture features based on Gabor filters , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[10]  J. Daugman Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles , 1980, Vision Research.

[11]  M. Elter,et al.  CADx of mammographic masses and clustered microcalcifications: a review. , 2009, Medical physics.

[12]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer With Mammography: Recent Advances , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[13]  Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva,et al.  Classification of breast regions as mass and non-mass based on digital mammograms using taxonomic indexes and SVM , 2015, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[14]  N. Riyahi Alam,et al.  Computer-Aided Mass Detection on Digitized Mammograms using a Novel Hybrid Segmentation System , 2010 .

[15]  N. Petrick,et al.  Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis. , 1995, Medical physics.

[16]  N. Szekely,et al.  A hybrid system for detecting masses in mammographic images , 2004, Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37510).

[17]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[18]  Nicolai Petkov,et al.  Nonlinear operator for oriented texture , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  Wen Gao,et al.  Hierarchical Ensemble of Global and Local Classifiers for Face Recognition , 2009, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[20]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[21]  Christopher J. C. Burges,et al.  A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition , 1998, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[22]  R. Fisher THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[23]  Asoke K. Nandi,et al.  Toward breast cancer diagnosis based on automated segmentation of masses in mammograms , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[24]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[25]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Texture Features for Browsing and Retrieval of Image Data , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[26]  Uday B. Desai,et al.  An unsupervised scheme for detection of microcalcifications on mammograms , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101).

[27]  Muhammad Hussain,et al.  False-positive reduction in mammography using multiscale spatial Weber law descriptor and support vector machines , 2013, Neural Computing and Applications.

[28]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classication , 2008 .

[29]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[30]  Muhammad Hussain,et al.  Comparison of Statistical, LBP, and Multi-Resolution Analysis Features for Breast Mass Classification , 2014, Journal of Medical Systems.

[31]  Samir Brahim Belhaouari,et al.  Breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiscale curvelet transform , 2010, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[32]  Yufeng Zheng,et al.  Breast Cancer Detection with Gabor Features from Digital Mammograms , 2010, Algorithms.

[33]  M. R. Turner,et al.  Texture discrimination by Gabor functions , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[34]  Ioan Buciu,et al.  Directional features for automatic tumor classification of mammogram images , 2011, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[35]  Nikolas P. Galatsanos,et al.  A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Anselmo Cardoso de Paiva,et al.  Detection of masses in mammographic images using geometry, Simpson's Diversity Index and SVM , 2010 .

[37]  Xavier Lladó,et al.  A textural approach for mass false positive reduction in mammography , 2009, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[38]  Salim Lahmiri,et al.  Hybrid discrete wavelet transform and Gabor filter banks processing for mammogram features extraction , 2011, 2011 IEEE 9th International New Circuits and systems conference.

[39]  Janez Demsar,et al.  Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets , 2006, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[40]  Galina L. Rogova,et al.  Microcalcification texture analysis in a hybrid system for computer-aided mammography , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[41]  Arnau Oliver,et al.  A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[42]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Directional analysis of images with Gabor wavelets , 2000, Proceedings 13th Brazilian Symposium on Computer Graphics and Image Processing (Cat. No.PR00878).

[43]  Zehang Sun,et al.  Monocular precrash vehicle detection: features and classifiers , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[44]  Muhammad Hussain,et al.  Mass detection in digital mammograms using Gabor filter bank , 2012 .