A nearly universal solar wind-magnetosphere coupling function inferred from 10 magnetospheric state variables

[1] We investigated whether one or a few coupling functions can represent best the interaction between the solar wind and the magnetosphere over a wide variety of magnetospheric activity. Ten variables which characterize the state of the magnetosphere were studied. Five indices from ground-based magnetometers were selected, namely Dst, Kp, AE, AU, and AL, and five from other sources, namely auroral power (Polar UVI), cusp latitude (sin(A c )), b2i (both DMSP), geosynchronous magnetic inclination angle (GOES), and polar cap size (SuperDARN). These indices were correlated with more than 20 candidate solar wind coupling functions. One function, representing the rate magnetic flux is opened at the magnetopause, correlated best with 9 out of 10 indices of magnetospheric activity. This is dΦ Mp / dt = v 4/3 B T 2/3 sin 8/3 (θ c /2), calculated from (rate IMF field lines approach the magnetopause, ∼v)(% of IMF lines which merge, sin 8/3 (θ c /2))(interplanetary field magnitude, B T )(merging line length, ∼(B MP /B T ) 1/3 ). The merging line length is based on flux matching between the solar wind and a dipole field and agrees with a superposed IMF on a vacuum dipole. The IMF clock angle dependence matches the merging rate reported (albeit with limited statistics) at high altitude. The nonlinearities of the magnetospheric response to B T and v are evident when the mean values of indices are plotted, in scatterplots, and in the superior correlations from dΦ MP /dt. Our results show that a wide variety of magnetospheric phenomena can be predicted with reasonable accuracy (r> 0.80 in several cases) ab initio, that is without the time history of the target index, by a single function, estimating the dayside merging rate. Across all state variables studied (including AL, which is hard to predict, and polar cap size, which is hard to measure), dΦ MP /dt accounts for about 57.2% of the variance, compared to 50.9% for E KL and 48.8% for vBs. All data sets included at least thousands of points over many years, up to two solar cycles, with just two parameter fits, and the correlations are thus robust. The sole index which does not correlate best with d ΦMP /dt is Dst, which correlates best (r = 0.87) with p 1/2 dΦ MP /dt. If dΦ MP /dt were credited with this success, its average score would be even higher.

[1]  V. C. A. Fertg^rto.  A NEW THEORY OF MAGNETIC STORMS , 2007 .

[2]  C. Meng,et al.  Cusp latitude and the optimal solar wind coupling function , 2006 .

[3]  Xinlin Li,et al.  Dst model for 1995–2002 , 2006 .

[4]  Raymond A. Greenwald,et al.  A statistical comparison of SuperDARN spectral width boundaries and DMSP particle precipitation boundaries in the morning sector ionosphere , 2005 .

[5]  R. Greenwald,et al.  Comparison of SuperDARN radar boundaries with DMSP particle precipitation boundaries , 2002 .

[6]  C. Meng,et al.  Ultraviolet insolation drives seasonal and diurnal space weather variations , 2002 .

[7]  Joseph P. Skura,et al.  OVATION: Oval variation, assessment, tracking, intensity, and online nowcasting , 2002 .

[8]  C. Meng,et al.  Polar Ultraviolet Imager observations of global auroral power as a function of polar cap size and magnetotail stretching , 2001 .

[9]  D. Weimer,et al.  An improved model of ionospheric electric potentials including substorm perturbations and application to the Geospace Environment Modeling November 24, 1996, event , 2001 .

[10]  J. King,et al.  Solar cycle effects in planetary geomagnetic activity: Analysis of 36‐year long OMNI dataset , 2000 .

[11]  S. Petrinec,et al.  Cusp observations of high- and low-latitude reconnection for northward interplanetary magnetic field , 2000 .

[12]  E. Kihn,et al.  Erratum ``Universal time variations of the auroral electrojet indices'' , 2000 .

[13]  W. J. Burke,et al.  Geoeffective interplanetary scale sizes derived from regression analysis of polar cap potentials , 1999 .

[14]  C. Meng,et al.  Characteristics of the solar wind controlled auroral emissions , 1998 .

[15]  S. Wing,et al.  Characterizing the state of the magnetosphere: Testing the ion precipitation maxima latitude (b2i) and the ion isotropy boundary , 1998 .

[16]  C. Meng,et al.  Shape of the open–closed boundary of the polar cap as determined from observations of precipitating particles by up to four DMSP satellites , 1998 .

[17]  S. Wing,et al.  Effects of interplanetary magnetic field z component and the solar wind dynamic pressure on the geosynchronous magnetic field , 1997 .

[18]  M. Kivelson,et al.  Dynamical polar cap: A unifying approach , 1997 .

[19]  C. Meng,et al.  Morphology of nightside precipitation , 1996 .

[20]  N. Crooker,et al.  On the low correlation between long‐term averages of solar wind speed and geomagnetic activity after 1976 , 1993 .

[21]  Mike Lockwood,et al.  Excitation and decay of solar-wind driven flows in the magnetosphere-ionosphere system , 1992 .

[22]  C. Russell,et al.  Proxy studies of energy transfer to the magnetosphere , 1991 .

[23]  C. Russell,et al.  Plasma flow reversals at the dayside magnetopause and the origin of asymmetric polar cap convection , 1990 .

[24]  Mike Lockwood,et al.  The excitation of plasma convection in the high‐latitude ionosphere , 1990 .

[25]  Patrick T. Newell,et al.  The cusp and the cleft/boundary layer: Low‐altitude identification and statistical local time variation , 1988 .

[26]  E. Friis-christensen,et al.  Magnetic activity in the polar cap—A new index , 1988 .

[27]  C. Russell,et al.  Accelerated plasma flows at the near‐tail magnetopause , 1986 .

[28]  M. S. Gussenhoven,et al.  A statistical model of auroral electron precipitation , 1985 .

[29]  G. Siscoe,et al.  Polar cap inflation and deflation , 1985 .

[30]  V. A. Sergeev,et al.  Pitch-angle scattering of energetic protons in the magnetotail current sheet as the dominant source of their isotropic precipitation into the nightside ionosphere , 1983 .

[31]  F. Mozer,et al.  Comparison of S3-3 polar cap potential drops with the interplanetary magnetic field and models of magnetopause reconnection , 1983 .

[32]  G. Siscoe,et al.  Scaling relations governing magnetospheric energy transfer , 1982 .

[33]  T. Speiser,et al.  Evidence for current sheet acceleration in the geomagnetic tail , 1982 .

[34]  R. W. Spiro,et al.  Dependence of polar cap potential drop on interplanetary parameters , 1981 .

[35]  P. Mayaud,et al.  Derivation, Meaning, and Use of Geomagnetic Indices , 1980 .

[36]  Lou‐Chuang Lee,et al.  Energy coupling function and solar wind‐magnetosphere dynamo , 1979 .

[37]  J. Gosling,et al.  On the high correlation between long‐term averages of solar wind speed and geomagnetic activity , 1977 .

[38]  C. Russell,et al.  An empirical relationship between interplanetary conditions and Dst , 1975 .

[39]  V. L. Patel,et al.  A study of geomagnetic storms , 1975 .

[40]  J. Dungey.  Interplanetary Magnetic Field and the Auroral Zones , 1961 .

[41]  S. Chapman,et al.  A new theory of magnetic storms , 1931 .