Innovative Technology-Based Healthcare and Support Services for Older Adults: How and Why Industrial Initiatives Convert to the Living Lab Approach

To support older adults with age-related or chronic diseases living in the community, suppliers are increasingly turning to Personal Health Systems (PHS) for remote care delivery. Despite the advantages of PHS, implementing these systems brings on several challenges on the technical level, but also related to the diversity of end-users, the characteristics of the ecosystem, the innovation process itself, regulatory and social aspects. To discuss these issues, we study two different PHS currently under implementation and deployment by two French companies: a telehealth service for frail older adults living at home and a GPS-based monitoring service to deal with wandering and disorientation of persons with dementia. We describe and compare problematic situations faced by these companies on three levels - demand, supply, and context- and explain why they decided to evolve towards a Living Lab approach to improve technology acceptance and social and economic return on investment.

[1]  Fabienne Abadie,et al.  Strategic Intelligence Monitor on Personal Health Systems Phase 2, Market Developments – Remote Patient Monitoring and Treatment, Telecare, Fitness/Wellness and mHealth , 2012 .

[2]  T. Lancet,et al.  Technologies for global health , 2012, The Lancet.

[3]  Neil Charness,et al.  Issues in training older adults to use computers , 1995, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[4]  R. D. de Wijk,et al.  Understanding heterogeneity among elderly consumers: an evaluation of segmentation approaches in the functional food market , 2014, Nutrition Research Reviews.

[5]  Chander K. Velu,et al.  Working Paper Series 4 / 2010 Thriving in Open Innovation Ecosystems : Toward a Collaborative Market Orientation , 2010 .

[6]  N. Charness,et al.  Factors Predicting the Use of Technology: Findings From the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) , 2006 .

[7]  Martin McKee,et al.  Health policy responses to the financial crisis in Europe , 2012 .

[8]  Marita A. O'Brien,et al.  Diffusion of Technology: Frequency of use for Younger and Older Adults , 2011, Ageing international.

[9]  Alessandro Giua,et al.  Guest Editorial , 2001, Discrete event dynamic systems.

[10]  Oli Mival,et al.  Mutual inspiration in the development of new technology for older people. , 2003 .

[11]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Guest editorial: special section on personal health systems , 2010, IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed..

[12]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[13]  Annie Gentès.  Design et médiation créative dans les technologies de l'information , 2008 .

[14]  J. Robine,et al.  Ageing in the European Union , 2013, The Lancet.

[15]  Anna Ståhlbröst,et al.  Concept Design with a Living Lab Approach , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  J. Sperandio,et al.  L'utilisation réelle des objets techniques du quotidien par les personnes âgées : Communication et personnes agées , 1999 .

[17]  R. Lerner,et al.  Nature and Nurture: The Complex Interplay of Genetic and Environmental Influences on Human Behavior and Development , 2014 .

[18]  Anna Ståhlbröst,et al.  Concept Design with a Living Lab Approach , 2009 .

[19]  Julie Doyle,et al.  Lessons learned in deploying independent living technologies to older adults’ homes , 2013, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[20]  Ilkka Korhonen,et al.  Personal health systems , 2008 .

[21]  Diane Whitehouse,et al.  Assessing Legal, Ethical and Governance Challenges in eHealth , 2013 .

[22]  W. Rogers,et al.  The Use of Communication Technologies by Older Adults: Exploring the Benefits from the User's Perspective , 2001 .

[23]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .