Multi-column chromatographic process development using simulated moving bed superstructure and simultaneous optimization – Model correction framework

Abstract In this work, we demonstrate an improved framework for simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatographic process development using a superstructure formulation. Various optimal column configurations and operations are obtained by solving a multi-objective optimization problem representing the superstructure by maximizing feed throughput and minimizing desorbent usage. In order to resolve the model mismatch with experimental data, here we utilize the simultaneous optimization – model correction (SOMC) method in which process optimization is carried out in tandem with model correction using data obtained from experimental evaluations. The potential of the superstructure–SOMC framework has been demonstrated by separating glucose and fructose using columns packed with a cation exchange resin with water as the mobile phase. The optimal operation modes found using the superstructure included standard SMB, three zone (3Z) operation, intermittent SMB (I-SMB) and a newly found outlet stream swing (OSS) – partial feed (PF) hybrid operation. All configurations were experimentally implemented using a Semba Octave ™ 100 Chromatography System.

[1]  Johannes P. Schlöder,et al.  Online identification of adsorption isotherms in SMB processes via efficient moving horizon state and parameter estimation , 2010, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[2]  A. Rodrigues,et al.  Separation of Fructose and Glucose from Cashew Apple Juice by SMB Chromatography , 2005 .

[3]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Comparison of configurations of a four-column simulated moving bed process by multi-objective optimization , 2008 .

[4]  Arvind Rajendran,et al.  Simulated moving bed chromatography for the separation of enantiomers. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[5]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  PowerFeed operation of simulated moving bed units: changing flow-rates during the switching interval. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[6]  Marco Mazzotti,et al.  Intermittent simulated moving bed chromatography: 2. Separation of Tröger's base enantiomers. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  Olivier Ludemann-Hombourger,et al.  The “VARICOL” Process: A New Multicolumn Continuous Chromatographic Process , 2000 .

[8]  M. Morbidelli,et al.  Simulated moving-bed chromatography and its application to chirotechnology. , 2000, Trends in biotechnology.

[9]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Comparison of the various kinetic models of non-linear chromatography , 1992 .

[10]  Phillip C. Wankat,et al.  SMB Operation Strategy−Partial Feed , 2002 .

[11]  Yoshiaki Kawajiri,et al.  Systematic optimization and experimental validation of ternary simulated moving bed chromatography systems. , 2014, Journal of chromatography. A.

[12]  Yoshiaki Kawajiri,et al.  Simultaneous modeling and optimization of nonlinear simulated moving bed chromatography by the prediction-correction method. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[13]  A. Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  Synergistic effects in competitive adsorption of carbohydrates on an ion-exchange resin. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[14]  M. Kinnaert,et al.  Parametric uncertainties and influence of the dead volume representation in modelling simulated moving bed separation processes. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[15]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Separation of chiral mixtures in real SMB units: The FlexSMB-LSRE® , 2009 .

[16]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Optimal operation of simulated moving bed units for nonlinear chromatographic separations , 1997 .

[17]  L. Biegler,et al.  Nonlinear Programming Superstructure for Optimal Dynamic Operations of Simulated Moving Bed Processes , 2006 .

[18]  A. Rodrigues,et al.  Simulated moving bed reactor for isomerization and separation of p-xylene , 2008 .

[19]  L. Biegler,et al.  Optimization strategies for simulated moving bed and PowerFeed processes , 2006 .

[20]  Christian Langel,et al.  Intermittent simulated moving bed chromatography: 3. Separation of Tröger's base enantiomers under nonlinear conditions. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[21]  Yoshiaki Kawajiri,et al.  Prediction‐correction method for optimization of simulated moving bed chromatography , 2013 .

[22]  Anita M. Katti,et al.  Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography , 1994 .

[23]  G. Dünnebier,et al.  Modelling and simulation of nonlinear chromatographic separation processes: a comparison of different modelling approaches , 2000 .

[24]  Achim Kienle,et al.  Improved operation of simulated moving bed processes through cyclic modulation of feed flow and feed concentration , 2003 .

[25]  Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  Improving performance of simulated moving bed chromatography by fractionation and feed-back of outlet streams. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. A.

[26]  Marco Mazzotti,et al.  Intermittent simulated moving bed chromatography: 1. Design criteria and cyclic steady-state. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[27]  J. Blehaut,et al.  Recent aspects in simulated moving bed , 1998 .

[28]  Michel Kinnaert,et al.  A systematic approach to SMB processes model identification from batch experiments , 2007 .

[29]  Nien-Hwa Linda Wang,et al.  Standing wave analysis of SMB chromatography: Linear systems , 1997 .

[30]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming , 2006, Math. Program..

[31]  Brian W. Kernighan,et al.  AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming , 1993 .

[32]  M. N. Özişik,et al.  Finite Difference Methods in Heat Transfer , 2017 .

[33]  A. Rodrigues,et al.  Outlet Streams Swing (OSS) and MultiFeed Operation of Simulated Moving Beds , 2007 .

[34]  L. Biegler,et al.  Large scale nonlinear optimization for asymmetric operation and design of Simulated Moving Beds. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. A.

[35]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Simulated moving‐bed units with extra‐column dead volume , 1999 .