The Evaluation of a Voting Web Based Application

Ballot layout and the incorporation of assistive technologies into voting systems are plagued with inconsistencies across the United States. The purpose of this study was to evaluate both ballot layout display configuration (information density) and a variety of controllers (e.g., mouse, 2- or 5-button controller) in order to assess performance and preference among voters. Participants were presented with three mock ballots, each with different layouts (scrollable pages, multiple columns or multiple pages per contest). Eye-tracking data and selection time data were recorded and a usability questionnaire was administered after each testing condition. The results of the study found that participants preferred the multiple column display configuration and the use of the mouse. The results from this study will be leveraged to design an iPad Voting Application with appropriate interfaces and controls. This will allow individuals with disabilities the opportunity to vote without requiring the dexterity to use a paper and pencil ballot.

[1]  Robert M. White,et al.  Comparative Anthropometry of the Hand , 1980 .

[2]  Herre van Oostendorp,et al.  The influence of screen size and text layout on the study of text , 1992 .

[3]  R Haigh,et al.  The ageing process: a challenge for design. , 1993, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  V. Hopkin.  Book reviewErgonomic aspects of visual display terminals: Edited by E. Grandjean, E. Vigliani Taylor and Francis Ltd, 1980, pp x + 300, £18 , 1981 .

[5]  Robert H. McKim,et al.  Human engineering guide to equipment design , 1963 .

[6]  Barbara S. Chaparro,et al.  Reading Online Text: A Comparison of Four White Space Layouts , 2004 .

[7]  Thomas M Greiner,et al.  Hand Anthropometry of U.S. Army Personnel , 1991 .

[8]  Anil Mital,et al.  Performance Reduction in Finger Amputees When Reaching and Operating Common Control Devices: A Pilot Experimental Investigation Using a Simulated Finger Disability , 2001, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[9]  Mary C. Dyson,et al.  The legibility of screen formats: are three columns better than one? , 1997, Comput. Graph..

[10]  J F Molenbroek,et al.  Anthropometry of elderly people in the Netherlands; research and applications. , 1987, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  Mary C. Dyson,et al.  The influence of reading speed and line length on the effectiveness of reading from screen , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  Mary C. Dyson,et al.  The Effects of Line Length and Method of Movement on Patterns of Reading from Screen. , 1998 .

[13]  H Herman Bouma,et al.  Visual reading processes and the quality of text displays , 1980 .

[14]  P A Kolers,et al.  Readability of Text Scrolled on Visual Display Terminals as a Function of Window Size , 1983, Human factors.