Segmentation of wall and plaque in in vitro vascular MR images

The potential of MR for plaque imaging and characterization is huge, due to its high spatial resolution, three-dimensional data acquisition and ability for tissue characterization. One of the major limitations, however, for the widespread use of this technique in large trials is the time consuming postprocessing which is often done on a manual basis. It is well known, that quantification improves reproducibility of imaging results, optimal reproducibility is reached, when only minimal user interference is required. This holds true not only for plaque imaging, but also for the assessment of regional wall motion [1–5] or perfusion [6–8], just to name a few. In this edition of the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, Yang et al. describe a new, mainly automated method for the segmentation of arterial wall layers and plaques. They applied their method in T1-weighted MR images of human ilio-femoral arteries in vitro and determined vessel outline, the lumen, as well as the internal elastic lamina and the external elastic lamina. With their method, they found a mean difference between automatically detected plaque borders and manually drawn borders of approximately one pixel. Such an accuracy may be regarded as sufficient and probably as good as it may get. Before this method can be applied in human in vivo studies, however, several questions remain and need to be shown in future studies.

[1]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Classification of Human Carotid Atherosclerotic Lesions With In Vivo Multicontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, Circulation.

[2]  Z. Fayad,et al.  Serial, noninvasive, in vivo magnetic resonance microscopy detects the development of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E‐deficient mice and its progression by arterial wall remodeling , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Three-Dimensional Black-Blood Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Coronary Vessel Wall Imaging Detects Positive Arterial Remodeling in Patients With Nonsignificant Coronary Artery Disease , 2002, Circulation.

[4]  J. Kuijer,et al.  Variance components of two-dimensional strain parameters in the left-ventricular heart wall obtained by magnetic resonance tagging , 2001, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[5]  E. Fleck,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Measurements for the Noninvasive Detection of Coronary Artery Disease , 2003, Circulation.

[6]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Dobutamine Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance for the Detection of Myocardial Ischemia With the Use of Myocardial Tagging , 2003, Circulation.

[7]  V. Fuster,et al.  Lipid Lowering by Simvastatin Induces Regression of Human Atherosclerotic Lesions: Two Years’ Follow-Up by High-Resolution Noninvasive Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, Circulation.

[8]  R. Wilson,et al.  Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution. , 1998, Medical physics.

[9]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Quantitative Ischemia Detection During Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Stress Testing by Use of FastHARP , 2003, Circulation.

[10]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Neovasculature Volume in Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque , 2003, Circulation.

[11]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Measurement of carotid wall volume and maximum area with contrast-enhanced 3D MR imaging: initial observations. , 2003, Radiology.

[12]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Imaging heart motion using harmonic phase MRI , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  J. Kuijer,et al.  Quantification of regional contractile function after infarction: strain analysis superior to wall thickening analysis in discriminating infarct from remote myocardium. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Z. Fayad The assessment of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque using MR imaging: A brief review , 2001, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[15]  Michael Jerosch-Herold,et al.  Direct comparison of an intravascular and an extracellular contrast agent for quantification of myocardial perfusion , 1999, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.