Assortative mating without assortative preference

Significance Assortative mating, the tendency of men and women who marry to have similar social characteristics, is a commonly observed phenomenon in human societies. This study shows that assortative mating could result from structural causes independent of human agents’ preference, because unmarried persons who newly enter marriage are systematically different from those who married earlier. Thus, assortative mating could result from selection, not by rational choice, but by the dynamics of social structures. Assortative mating—marriage of a man and a woman with similar social characteristics—is a commonly observed phenomenon. In the existing literature in both sociology and economics, this phenomenon has mainly been attributed to individuals’ conscious preferences for assortative mating. In this paper, we show that patterns of assortative mating may arise from another structural source even if individuals do not have assortative preferences or possess complementary attributes: dynamic processes of marriages in a closed system. For a given cohort of youth in a finite population, as the percentage of married persons increases, unmarried persons who newly enter marriage are systematically different from those who married earlier, giving rise to the phenomenon of assortative mating. We use microsimulation methods to illustrate this dynamic process, using first the conventional deterministic Gale–Shapley model, then a probabilistic Gale–Shapley model, and then two versions of the encounter mating model.

[1]  R. Mare Five decades of educational assortative mating. , 1991 .

[2]  P. Zarembka Frontiers in econometrics , 1973 .

[3]  Yu Xie,et al.  Population heterogeneity and causal inference , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  L. S. Shapley,et al.  College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 2013, Am. Math. Mon..

[5]  D. Lichter,et al.  Social Boundaries and Marital Assimilation: Interpreting Trends in Racial and Ethnic Intermarriage , 2007 .

[6]  Robert D. Mare,et al.  Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003 , 2005, Demography.

[7]  G. Becker Chapter Title: a Theory of Marriage a Theory of Marriage , 2022 .

[8]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[9]  Yu Xie,et al.  Temporal and Regional Variation in the Strength of Educational Homogamy , 2000, American Sociological Review.

[10]  Zhenchao Qian Breaking the racial barriers: Variations in interracial marriage between 1980 and 1990 , 1997, Demography.

[11]  Daniel A. Powers,et al.  Statistical Methods for Categorical Data Analysis , 1999 .

[12]  F. LeClere,et al.  Local Marriage Markets and the Marital Behavior of Black and White Women , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  M. Kalmijn,et al.  Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. , 1998, Annual review of sociology.

[14]  J. Logan,et al.  Opportunity and Choice in Socially Structured Labor Markets , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  F. Torche Educational assortative mating and economic inequality: A comparative analysis of three Latin American countries , 2010, Demography.

[16]  Yu Xie,et al.  A Preference‐Opportunity‐Choice Framework with Applications to Intergroup Friendship1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  M. Kalmijn Shifting Boundaries: Trends in Religious and Educational Homogamy , 1991 .

[18]  Michael A Newton,et al.  Two-Sided Estimation of Mate Preferences for Similarities in Age, Education, and Religion , 2008 .

[19]  D. Lichter,et al.  Marriage Markets and Marital Choice , 1995 .

[20]  D. J. Landry,et al.  Race and the retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men? , 1992 .

[21]  S. Kalick,et al.  The Matching Hypothesis Reexamined , 1986 .

[22]  A. Gimelfarb Processes of Pair Formation Leading to Assortative Mating in Biological Populations: Encounter-Mating Model , 1988, The American Naturalist.

[23]  Christine R. Schwartz,et al.  Center for Demography and Ecology University of Wisconsin-Madison Earnings Inequality and the Changing Association Between Spouses’ Earnings , 2007 .

[24]  J. Lammers,et al.  Educational Homogamy in 65 Countries: An Explanation of Differences in Openness Using Country-Level Explanatory Variables , 1998 .

[25]  Peter M. Blau,et al.  Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations , 1984 .