Surprising Incentive: An Instrument for Promoting Safety Performance of Construction Employees

Background In comparison with other industries, the construction industry still has a higher rate of fatal injuries, and thus, there is a need to apply new and innovative approaches for preventing accidents and promoting safe conditions at construction sites. Methods In this study, the effectiveness of a new incentive system—the surprising incentive system—was assessed. One year after the implementation of this new incentive system, behavioral changes of employees with respect to seven types of activities were observed. Results The results of this study showed that there is a significant relationship between the new incentive system and the safety performance of frontline employees. The new incentive system had a greater positive impact in the first 6 months since its implementation. In the long term, however, safety performance experienced a gradual reduction. Based on previous studies, all activities selected in this study are important indicators of the safety conditions at workplaces. However, there is a need for a comprehensive and simple-to-apply tool for assessing frontline employees' safety performance. Shortening the intervals between incentives is more effective in promoting safety performance. Conclusion The results of this study proved that the surprising incentive would improve the employees' safety performance just in the short term because the surprising value of the incentives dwindle over time. For this reason and to maintain the surprising value of the incentive system, the amount and types of incentives need to be evaluated and modified annually or biannually.

[1]  Ivan T. Robertson,et al.  Improving safety by the modification of behaviour , 1994 .

[2]  M P Hagenzieker,et al.  Effects of incentive programs to stimulate safety belt use: a meta-analysis. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  The Relationship Between Safety Climate and Recent Accidents: Behavioral Learning and Cognitive Attributions , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[4]  A. Neal,et al.  The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior , 2000 .

[5]  Herwig W. Kressler,et al.  Motivate and Reward: Performance Appraisal and Incentive Systems for Business Success , 2003 .

[6]  Tariq S. Abdelhamid,et al.  Identifying Root Causes of Construction Accidents , 2001 .

[7]  Fei Song,et al.  Sorting and Incentive Effects of Pay for Performance: An Experimental Investigation , 2007 .

[8]  L. Green,et al.  Maintaining Employee Participation in Workplace Health Promotion Programs , 1990, Health education quarterly.

[9]  Cynna Selvy,et al.  Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) , 2015 .

[10]  Christopher Ngacho,et al.  A performance evaluation framework of development projects: An empirical study of Constituency Development Fund (CDF) construction projects in Kenya , 2014 .

[11]  J. Hinze.  Safety Incentives: Do They Reduce Injuries? , 2002 .

[12]  Margaret Emsley,et al.  The impact of contractors' attributes on construction project success: A post construction evaluation , 2013 .

[13]  M N Vinodkumar,et al.  Safety management practices and safety behaviour: assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Mary Butler,et al.  A structured review of the effect of economic incentives on consumers' preventive behavior. , 2004, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  Alison G Vredenburgh,et al.  Organizational safety: which management practices are most effective in reducing employee injury rates? , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[16]  A R Duff,et al.  Contributing factors in construction accidents. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  Thanet Aksorn,et al.  Critical success factors influencing safety program performance in Thai construction projects , 2008 .

[18]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Factors That Influence Safety Performance of Specialty Contractors , 2003 .

[19]  B. Sulzer-Azaroff,et al.  Beyond training: organizational performance management techniques. , 1994, Occupational medicine.

[20]  Florence Yean Yng Ling,et al.  Framework for project managers to manage construction safety , 2005 .

[21]  Iraj Mohammadfam,et al.  Framework for Continuous Assessment and Improvement of Occupational Health and Safety Issues in Construction Companies , 2014, Safety and health at work.

[22]  D. Fang,et al.  Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: Investigating factors on construction sites , 2008 .

[23]  R. Lardner,et al.  Strategies to promote safe behaviour as part of a health and safety management system , 2002 .

[24]  A Neal,et al.  Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. , 2000, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[25]  Denise Gravitt,et al.  Construction Safety , 2013 .

[26]  Kumar Neeraj Jha,et al.  Safety incentive and penalty provisions in Indian construction projects and their impact on safety performance , 2013, International journal of injury control and safety promotion.

[27]  R. Bruce McAfee,et al.  The use of incentives/feedback to enhance work place safety: A critique of the literature. , 1989 .

[28]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Leading indicators of construction safety performance , 2013 .

[29]  Markku Hurme,et al.  Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries , 2012 .

[30]  Roger C. Jensen,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness of an industrial lift truck safety training program , 1984 .

[31]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  A framework for evaluating the safety performance of construction contractors , 2005 .

[32]  Victor Y. Haines,et al.  Understanding reactions to safety incentives , 2001 .

[33]  S. Tang,et al.  Pain and suffering costs of persons in construction accidents: Hong Kong experience , 2005 .

[34]  Enno Koehn,et al.  Safety in Developing Countries: Professional and Bureaucratic Problems , 1995 .