External facial features modify the representation of internal facial features in the fusiform face area

Most studies of face identity have excluded external facial features by either removing them or covering them with a hat. However, external facial features may modify the representation of internal facial features. Here we assessed whether the representation of face identity in the fusiform face area (FFA), which has been primarily studied for internal facial features, is modified by differences in external facial features. We presented faces in which external and internal facial features were manipulated independently. Our findings show that the FFA was sensitive to differences in external facial features, but this effect was significantly larger when the external and internal features were aligned than misaligned. We conclude that the FFA generates a holistic representation in which the internal and the external facial features are integrated. These results indicate that to better understand real-life face recognition both external and internal features should be included.

[1]  A. Baddeley,et al.  When face recognition fails. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[2]  Jamie Young.  United We Stand , 1996 .

[3]  K. Nakayama,et al.  The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks , 2007, Cognition.

[5]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Heterogeneous Structure in Face-selective Human Occipito-temporal Cortex , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  R. Malach,et al.  Sub-exemplar shape tuning in human face-related areas. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces? , 2003, Cognition.

[8]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. , 2004, Neuron.

[9]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. , 2005, Proceedings. Biological sciences.

[10]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[11]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[12]  G. Orban,et al.  Selectivity of Neuronal Adaptation Does Not Match Response Selectivity: A Single-Cell Study of the fMRI Adaptation Paradigm , 2006, Neuron.

[13]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[14]  Michael G. Strintzis,et al.  Face Recognition , 2008, Encyclopedia of Multimedia.

[15]  D. Maurer,et al.  Impairment in Holistic Face Processing Following Early Visual Deprivation , 2004, Psychological science.

[16]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Neural Basis of the Behavioral Face-Inversion Effect , 2005, Current Biology.

[17]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[18]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Internal and External Features of the Face Are Represented Holistically in Face-Selective Regions of Visual Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features , 2007 .

[20]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  T. Poggio,et al.  I think I know that face... , 1996, Nature.

[22]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  'United' we stand. , 2002 .

[23]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[24]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[25]  B. Rossion,et al.  Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[27]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[28]  Galit Yovel,et al.  Nonpreferred Stimuli Modify the Representation of Faces in the Fusiform Face Area , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  A. Treves,et al.  Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.