Improving the Practice of Conservation: a Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda for Conservation Science

Abstract: Effective conservation requires addressing three fundamental questions whose answers can only be sought in conservation practice: (1) What should our goals be and how do we measure progress in reaching them? (2) How can we most effectively take action to achieve conservation? and (3) How can we learn to do conservation better? This essay provides a conceptual framework and research agenda for a conservation science that uses the principles of adaptive management to answer these questions. The framework is based on a general model of a conservation project. The conservation target involves defining the specific area or population the project is trying to influence. This target is affected by direct and indirect threats and opportunities; we provide a table of potential direct threats. Conservation actions that are taken to counter these threats can be divided into approaches, strategies, and specific tools; we present a comprehensive table of potential approaches. Finally, the practicioners that take these actions include individuals, organizations, project alliances, and networks; we define the specific functional roles necessary to achieve effective adaptive management. We then use this framework to outline a research agenda for conservation science that involves defining clear and practical measures of conservation success, determining sound guiding principles for using conservation strategies and tools, and developing the knowledge and skills in individuals and organizations for good adaptive management and thus for making conservation more effective.

[1]  H. Malde,et al.  A Practitioner’s Handbook for Site Conservation Planning and Measuring Conservation Success , 2003 .

[2]  Richard Margoluis,et al.  A Systematic Test of an Enterprise Strategy for Community‐Based Biodiversity Conservation , 2001 .

[3]  P. Ferraro.  Global Habitat Protection: Limitations of Development Interventions and a Role for Conservation Performance Payments , 2001 .

[4]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Effectiveness in Conservation Practice: Pointers from Medicine and Public Health , 2001 .

[5]  Richard Margoluis,et al.  Adaptive management: A tool for conservation practitioners , 2001 .

[6]  R. Margoluis,et al.  Maximum yield?: sustainable agriculture as a tool for conservation , 2001 .

[7]  E. Wollenberg,et al.  Linking Livelihoods and Conservation: A Conceptual Framework and Scale for Assessing the Integration of Human Needs and Biodiversity , 2000 .

[8]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[9]  R. Margoluis,et al.  In good company: effective alliances for conservation. , 2000 .

[10]  C. Freese.  The consumptive use of wild species in the Arctic : challenges and opportunities for ecological sustainability , 2000 .

[11]  Catherine A. Christen,et al.  Shifting the power : decentralization and biodiversity conservation , 2000 .

[12]  J. Gustanski,et al.  Protecting the land : conservation easements past, present, and future , 2000 .

[13]  J. Lassoie,et al.  Incentives for Biological Conservation : Costa Rica ’ s Private Wildlife Refuge Program , 2000 .

[14]  Brian D. Richter,et al.  Conservation of Biodiversity in a World of Use , 1999 .

[15]  Richard Margoluis,et al.  Threat Reduction Assessment: a Practical and Cost‐Effective Approach to Evaluating Conservation and Development Projects , 1999 .

[16]  J. Lawton,et al.  The Gaps between Theory and Practice in Selecting Nature Reserves , 1999 .

[17]  Susan K. Jacobson,et al.  Communication Skills for Conservation Professionals , 1999 .

[18]  Larry B. Crowder,et al.  Current Normative Concepts in Conservation , 1999 .

[19]  G. Bustamante,et al.  Setting Geographic Priorities For Marine Conservation In Latin America And The Caribbean , 1999 .

[20]  Richard Margoluis,et al.  Greater than the sum of their parts: designing conservation and development programs to maximize results and learning. A practical guide for program managers and donors. , 1999 .

[21]  J. Terborgh.  Requiem for Nature , 1999 .

[22]  N. Salafsky,et al.  Evaluating linkages between business, the environment, and local communities : final analytical results from the Biodiversity Conservation Network , 1999 .

[23]  Taylor H. Ricketts,et al.  Terrestrial ecoregions of North America : a conservation assessment , 1999 .

[24]  E. Sterling,et al.  Interpreting biodiversity : a manual for environmental educators in the tropics , 1999 .

[25]  Richard Margoluis,et al.  Measures of Success: Designing, Managing, and Monitoring Conservation and Development Projects , 1998 .

[26]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions , 1997 .

[27]  A. Dobson,et al.  Geographic Distribution of Endangered Species in the United States , 1997, Science.

[28]  Mundy,et al.  Hopes for the Future: Restoration Ecology and Conservation Biology , 1997 .

[29]  Carl Hosticka,et al.  Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment , 1995 .

[30]  Brian Groombridge,et al.  1996 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals , 1996 .

[31]  Gustavo Stubrich.  The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[32]  R L Pressey,et al.  Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  John G. Robinson.  The Limits to Caring: Sustainable Living and the Loss of Biodiversity , 1993 .

[34]  D. A. Munro.  Caring for the Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living , 1991 .

[35]  John G. Robinson,et al.  Training the New Conservationist: Cross-disciplinary Education in the 1990s , 1990, Environmental Conservation.

[36]  S. Jacobson.  Graduate Education in Conservation Biology , 1990 .

[37]  R. Noss.  Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach , 1990 .

[38]  N. Myers.  Threatened biotas: "Hot spots" in tropical forests , 1988, The Environmentalist.

[39]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[40]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[41]  Robert W. Loftin.  The Arrogance of Humanism , 1981 .