Strategies for 2nd generation biofuels in EU - co-firing to stimulate feedstock supply development and process integration to improve energy efficiency and economic competitiveness.

Abstract The present biofuel policies in the European Union primarily stimulate 1st generation biofuels that are produced based on conventional food crops. They may be a distraction from lignocellulose based 2nd generation biofuels – and also from biomass use for heat and electricity – by keeping farmers' attention and significant investments focusing on first generation biofuels and the cultivation of conventional food crops as feedstocks. This article presents two strategies that can contribute to the development of 2nd generation biofuels based on lignocellulosic feedstocks. The integration of gasification-based biofuel plants in district heating systems is one option for increasing the energy efficiency and improving the economic competitiveness of such biofuels. Another option, biomass co-firing with coal, generates high-efficiency biomass electricity and reduces CO 2 emissions by replacing coal. It also offers a near-term market for lignocellulosic biomass, which can stimulate development of supply systems for biomass also suitable as feedstock for 2nd generation biofuels. Regardless of the long-term priorities of biomass use for energy, the stimulation of lignocellulosic biomass production by development of near term and cost-effective markets is judged to be a no-regrets strategy for Europe. Strategies that induce a relevant development and exploit existing energy infrastructures in order to reduce risk and reach lower costs, are proposed an attractive complement the present and prospective biofuel policies.

[1]  J Muth Renewable fuels for advanced powertrains , 2006 .

[2]  G. Fischer,et al.  Biofuel production potentials in Europe: sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part I: Land productivity potentials. , 2010 .

[3]  Malcolm Keay,et al.  Can Coal Contribute to Sustainable Development? , 2005 .

[4]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Energy crop production costs in the EU , 2009 .

[5]  G. Fischer,et al.  Biofuel production potentials in Europe: sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part II: Land use scenarios , 2010 .

[6]  R. Sims,et al.  An overview of current industry and RD&D activities , 2008 .

[7]  Marc Londo,et al.  Competition between biofuels: Modeling technological learning and cost reductions over time , 2010 .

[8]  Bo G Leckner,et al.  Co-combustion - A summary of technology , 2007 .

[9]  David A. Tillman,et al.  Biomass cofiring : status and prospects 1996 , 1998 .

[10]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  Co-firing biomass with coal for electricity generation—An assessment of the potential in EU27 , 2009 .

[11]  David A. Tillman,et al.  Cofiring benefits for coal and biomass , 2000 .

[12]  János M. Beér,et al.  High efficiency electric power generation: The environmental role , 2007 .

[13]  Filip Johnsson,et al.  The European power plant infrastructure—Presentation of the Chalmers energy infrastructure database with applications , 2007 .

[14]  L. Baxter Biomass-coal co-combustion: opportunity for affordable renewable energy , 2005 .

[15]  IEA bioenergy Task 32: biomass combustion and cofiring. , 2002 .

[16]  Antonio De Belvis,et al.  Health statistics - Key data on health 2002 (Data 1970-2001) Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2002 , 2004, Italian Journal of Public Health.