The Development of Students' Understanding of Science

Children construct intuitive understandings of the physical world based on their everyday experiences. These intuitive understandings are organized in skeletal conceptual structures known as framework theories. Framework theories are different from currently accepted science and impose constraints on how students understand the scientific explanations of phenomena causing the creation of fragmented or synthetic conceptions. It is argued that in order to understand science students need to make important changes in the way they represent and explain the physical world as well as in their ways of reasoning. During the development of science knowledge students must also create new concepts and new belief systems which do not necessarily supplant their framework theories but co-exist with them. These developments are gradual and slow and follow a learning progression. In order to be effective science education needs to make students aware of their intuitive understandings, provide scientific information gradually and in agreement with students’ learning progressions and develop students’ reasoning abilities and executive function skills.

[1]  N. Makris,et al.  The role of executive function in the construction and employment of scientific and mathematical concepts that require conceptual change learning , 2018, Neuroeducation.

[2]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Learning and Teaching about Matter in Grades K–8: When Should the Atomic-Molecular Theory be Introduced? , 2009 .

[3]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  The knowledge integration perspective: connections across research and education , 2013 .

[4]  Stella Vosniadou Conceptual Change in Learning and Instruction , 2013 .

[5]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Two Kinds and Four Sub-Types of Misconceived Knowledge, Ways to Change it, and the Learning Outcomes , 2013 .

[6]  H. Wellman,et al.  Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains. , 1998 .

[7]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[8]  W. Brewer,et al.  Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  J. Dauben Georg Cantor and the Origins of Transfinite Set Theory , 1983 .

[10]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Is it the Earth that turns or the Sun that goes behind the mountains? Students’ misconceptions about the day/night cycle after reading a science text , 2017 .

[11]  Joshua Rottman,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General Professional Physical Scientists Display Tenacious Teleological Tendencies : Purpose-Based Reasoning as a Cognitive Default , 2012 .

[12]  David Hammer,et al.  Conceptual change in physics , 2013 .

[13]  J. Calderhead Teachers’ beliefs and knowledge , 2019, Problem Solving for Teaching and Learning.

[14]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  A bird's-eye view of the "pieces" vs "coherence" controversy (from the "pieces" side of the fence") , 2013 .

[15]  R. Duschl,et al.  Learning progressions and teaching sequences: a review and analysis , 2011 .

[16]  R. Driver,et al.  Pupils and Paradigms: a Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students , 1978 .

[17]  Martin Riopel,et al.  Differences in Brain Activation between Novices and Experts in Science during a Task Involving a Common Misconception in Electricity. , 2014 .

[18]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Conceptual Change from the Framework Theory Side of the Fence , 2014 .

[19]  David M. Sobel,et al.  Causal learning mechanisms in very young children: two-, three-, and four-year-olds infer causal relations from patterns of variation and covariation. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[20]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[21]  James D. Slotta,et al.  Misconceived Causal Explanations for Emergent Processes , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[23]  Steve Masson,et al.  PERSISTENCE OF THE INTUITIVE CONCEPTION THAT HEAVIER OBJECTS SINK MORE: A REACTION TIME STUDY WITH DIFFERENT LEVELS OF INTERFERENCE , 2015 .

[24]  V. Sloutsky The role of similarity in the development of categorization , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Mental Models of the Day/Night Cycle , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Susan Carey,et al.  The effect of executive function on biological reasoning in young children: an individual differences study. , 2014, Child development.

[27]  S. Carey,et al.  Theories of development: In dialog with Jean Piaget , 2015 .

[28]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Persistence of the Intuitive Conception of Living Things in Adolescence , 2010 .

[29]  A. diSessa Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[30]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  Evaluating the effects of analogy enriched text on the learning of science: The importance of learning indexes , 2018, Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

[31]  Andrew Shtulman,et al.  Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions , 2012, Cognition.

[32]  Ola Halldén,et al.  Re-framing the problem of conceptual change , 1994 .

[33]  Christopher J. Lonigan,et al.  Relations between inhibitory control and the development of academic skills in preschool and kindergarten: a meta-analysis. , 2014, Developmental psychology.

[34]  John Yen,et al.  Introduction , 2004, CACM.

[35]  J. Clement Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .