The use and abuse of population viability analysis.

A recent study by Brook et al. empirically tested the performance of population viability analysis (PVA) using data from 21 populations across a wide range of species. The study concluded that PVAs are good at predicting the future dynamics of populations. We suggest that this conclusion is a result of a bias in the studies that Brook et al. included in their analyses. We present arguments that PVAs can only be accurate at predicting extinction probabilities if data are extensive and reliable, and if the distribution of vital rates between individuals and years can be assumed stationary in the future, or if any changes can be accurately predicted. In particular, we note that although catastrophes are likely to have precipitated many extinctions, estimates of the probability of catastrophes are unreliable.

[1]  L. Eberhardt Optimal Policies for Conservation of Large Mammals, with Special Reference to Marine Ecosystems , 1977, Environmental Conservation.

[2]  M. Boyce Population Viability Analysis , 1992 .

[3]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  ALEX : A Model For The Viability Analysis Of Spatially Structured Populations , 1995 .

[4]  D. Ludwig MANAGEMENT OF STOCKS THAT MAY COLLAPSE , 1998 .

[5]  D. Ludwig Is it meaningful to estimate a probability of extinction , 1999 .

[6]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  A Review of the Generic Computer Programs ALEX, RAMAS/space and VORTEX for Modelling the Viability of Wildlife Metapopulations , 1995 .

[7]  M. McCarthy,et al.  A method for validating stochastic models of population viability : a case study of the mountain pygmy-possum (Burramys parvus) , 2000 .

[8]  C. Uhl,et al.  FIRE IN AMAZONIAN SELECTIVELY LOGGED RAIN FOREST AND THE POTENTIAL FOR FIRE REDUCTION , 1997 .

[9]  S. Engen,et al.  Predicting the time to quasi-extinction for populations far below their carrying capacity. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Temporal changes in key factors and key age groups influencing the population dynamics of female red deer , 2000 .

[11]  D. Nepstad,et al.  Positive feedbacks in the fire dynamic of closed canopy tropical forests , 1999, Science.

[12]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology , 2000, Nature.

[13]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Ranking Conservation and Timber Management Options for Leadbeater's Possum in Southeastern Australia Using Population Viability Analysis , 1996 .

[14]  Richard Frankham,et al.  Does population viability analysis software predict the behaviour of real populations? A retrospective study on the Lord Howe Island woodhen Tricholimnas sylvestris (Sclater) , 1997 .

[15]  Robert C. Lacy,et al.  VORTEX: a computer simulation model for population viability analysis , 1993 .

[16]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  When is it meaningful to estimate an extinction probability , 2000 .

[17]  James A. Chandler,et al.  Population Viability Analysis of Riverine Fishes , 1999 .

[18]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  A framework for the improved management of threatened species based on Population Viability Analysis (PVA) , 1994 .

[19]  M. Mangel,et al.  Four Facts Every Conservation Biologists Should Know about Persistence , 1994 .

[20]  Tim Coulson,et al.  Small‐scale spatial dynamics in a fluctuating ungulate population , 1999 .

[21]  A. Timmermann,et al.  Increased El Niño frequency in a climate model forced by future greenhouse warming , 1999, Nature.