The Effects of Compensatory Scanning Training on Mobility in Patients with Homonymous Visual Field Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction Homonymous visual field defects (HVFD) are a common consequence of postchiasmatic acquired brain injury and often lead to mobility-related difficulties. Different types of compensatory scanning training have been developed, aimed at decreasing consequences of the HVFD by changing visual scanning. Aim The aim of the present study is to examine the effects of a compensatory scanning training program using horizontal scanning on mobility-related activities and participation in daily life. Method The main interest of this study is to assess the effectiveness of training on mobility-related activities and participation in daily life. Visual scanning tests, such as dot counting and visual search, and control measures for visual functions and reading have been included as well. First, it is examined how performance on scanning and mobility-related measures is affected in patients with HVFD by comparing scores with scores of a healthy control group (n = 25). Second, the effect of training is assessed using an RCT design, in which performance of 26 patients before and after training is compared to performance of 23 patients in a waiting list control group. Results Self-reported improvements after training were found, accompanied by improvements in detecting peripheral stimuli and avoiding obstacles during walking, especially in dual task situations in which a second task limits the attentional capacity available for compensatory scanning. Training only improved mobility-related activities in which detection of peripheral stimuli is important, while no improvement was found on tests that require other visual skills, such as reading, visual counting and visual search. Conclusion This is the first RCT to evaluate the effects of a compensatory scanning training that is based on a systematic horizontal scanning rhythm. This training improved mobility-related activities. The results suggest that different types of compensatory scanning strategies are appropriate for different types of activities. Trial Registration ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN16833414

[1]  W. Brouwer,et al.  Spontaneous recovery and treatment effects in patients with homonymous visual field defects: a meta-analysis of existing literature in terms of the ICF framework. , 2014, Survey of ophthalmology.

[2]  H. Mallot,et al.  Assessment of vision-related quality of life in patients with homonymous visual field defects , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[3]  I. Keller,et al.  Improvement of Visual Search After Audiovisual Exploration Training in Hemianopic Patients , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[4]  L. Cocchiarella,et al.  Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment , 2000 .

[5]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  S K Mannan,et al.  Saccadic visual search training: a treatment for patients with homonymous hemianopia , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[7]  G. Nelles,et al.  Compensatory visual field training for patients with hemianopia after stroke , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  H. Diener,et al.  Eye-movement training-induced changes of visual field representation in patients with post-stroke hemianopia , 2010, Journal of Neurology.

[9]  A. Kastrup,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing 2 Interventions for Visual Field Loss With Standard Occupational Therapy During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[10]  Caterina Bertini,et al.  Audio-visual stimulation improves oculomotor patterns in patients with hemianopia , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Jon Currie,et al.  Homonymous Visual Field Defects and Stroke in an Older Population , 2002, Stroke.

[12]  Alison R. Lane,et al.  Efficacy and Feasibility of Home-Based Training for Individuals With Homonymous Visual Field Defects , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[13]  Difficulties in Daily Life Reported by Patients With Homonymous Visual Field Defects , 2015, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[14]  M. Tant,et al.  Visual performance in homonymous hemianopia: assessment, training and driving , 2002 .

[15]  J. Trobe,et al.  Isolated homonymous hemianopia. A review of 104 cases. , 1973 .

[16]  Alison R. Lane,et al.  Visual exploration training is no better than attention training for treating hemianopia. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  Functional compensation of visual field deficits in hemianopic patients under the influence of different task demands , 2010, Vision Research.

[18]  C. Kennard,et al.  Can visual function be restored in patients with homonymous hemianopia? , 1997, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  G. Kerkhoff,et al.  Rehabilitation of homonymous scotomata in patients with postgeniculate damage of the visual system: saccadic compensation training. , 1992, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[20]  J Zihl,et al.  Visual field recovery from scotoma in patients with postgeniculate damage. A review of 55 cases. , 1985, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  R. Hays,et al.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  S. Pocock,et al.  Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. , 1975, Biometrics.

[23]  G. Kerkhoff.  Restorative and compensatory therapy approaches in cerebral blindness - a review. , 1999, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[24]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Rehabilitation of reading and visual exploration in visual field disorders: transfer or specificity? , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  Celia S. Chen,et al.  Functional improvements following the use of the NVT Vision Rehabilitation program for patients with hemianopia following stroke. , 2012, NeuroRehabilitation.

[26]  M. Leen.  Neuropsychologische diagnostiek, de klinische praktijk , 2009 .

[27]  N. Newman,et al.  Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases. , 2006, Neurology.

[28]  S. Morris.  Estimating Effect Sizes From Pretest-Posttest-Control Group Designs , 2008 .

[29]  U. Shahani,et al.  Interventions for Visual Field Defects in Patients With Stroke , 2012, Stroke.

[30]  W. Rosenstiel,et al.  Homonymous Visual Field Loss and Its Impact on Visual Exploration: A Supermarket Study. , 2014, Translational vision science & technology.

[31]  N. Bolognini,et al.  Visual search improvement in hemianopic patients after audio-visual stimulation. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[33]  J. Zihl,et al.  Die Anamnese zerebral bedingter Sehstörungen , 1990 .

[34]  A. H. Keeney.  Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment , 1989 .

[35]  G B Arden,et al.  The Visual System , 2021, AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 6th Edition, 2021.

[36]  Mary Warren,et al.  Pilot study on activities of daily living limitations in adults with hemianopsia. , 2009, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[37]  B. Sabel,et al.  Beeinträchtigung der seh- und gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität bei Schlaganfallpatienten mit homonymen Gesichtsfelddefekten in Abhängigkeit von der Schwere des visuellen Funktionsverlustes , 2009, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde.

[38]  M. R. Boer,et al.  Intra‐ and interrater agreement and reliability of the Functional Field Score , 2005, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[39]  Ulrike Willinger,et al.  Eine neue Lesetafel* zur gleichzeitigen Bestimmung von Lesevisus und Lesegeschwindigkeit , 1998 .

[40]  G. Kerkhoff,et al.  Neurovisual rehabilitation in cerebral blindness. , 1994, Archives of neurology.

[41]  C. Hoyng,et al.  [The Dutch version of the Radner Reading Chart for assessing vision function]. , 2007, Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde.

[42]  Mary Hayhoe,et al.  Differential impact of partial cortical blindness on gaze strategies when sitting and walking – An immersive virtual reality study , 2011, Vision Research.

[43]  Frans W. Cornelissen,et al.  GRONINGEN EDGE CONTRAST CHART (GECKO) AND GLARE MEASUREMENTS , 1994 .

[44]  H. Diener,et al.  Eye-movement training-induced plasticity in patients with post-stroke hemianopia , 2009, Journal of Neurology.

[45]  Sven Ohl,et al.  Compensatory eye and head movements of patients with homonymous hemianopia in the naturalistic setting of a driving simulation , 2015, Journal of Neurology.

[46]  N. Newman,et al.  Natural history of homonymous hemianopia , 2006, Neurology.

[47]  L. M. Wellock.  Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment , 1972 .

[48]  J. Feigenson,et al.  Factors Influencing Outcome and Length of Stay in a Stroke Rehabilitation Unit Part 1. Analysis of 248 Unscreened Patients ‐Medical and Functional Prognostic Indicators , 1977, Stroke.

[49]  J. Zihl,et al.  Visual scanning behavior in patients with homonymous hemianopia , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  K H Ruddock,et al.  Residual vision in patients with retrogeniculate lesions of the visual pathways. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[51]  S. Trauzettel-Klosinski,et al.  Comparing explorative saccade and flicker training in hemianopia , 2009, Neurology.

[52]  C. Lucas,et al.  The effect of visual training for patients with visual field defects due to brain damage: a systematic review , 2006, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[53]  J. Feigenson,et al.  Factors Influencing Outcome and Length of Stay in a Stroke Rehabilitation Unit: Part 2. Comparison of 318 Screened and 248 Unscreened Patients , 1977, Stroke.

[54]  W. Brouwer,et al.  Attention and Driving in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Question of Coping with Time‐Pressure , 2002, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[55]  Erratum to “Functional compensation of visual field deficits in hemianopic patients under the influence of different task demands” [Vision Research 50 (12) (2010) 1158–1172] , 2011, Vision Research.

[56]  Christopher Kennard,et al.  Compensatory strategies following visual search training in patients with homonymous hemianopia: an eye movement study , 2010, Journal of Neurology.

[57]  S. Brophy,et al.  Interventions for latent autoimmune diabetes (LADA) in adults. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[58]  M. Aloia,et al.  Randomizing research participants: promoting balance and concealment in small samples. , 2010, Research in nursing & health.

[59]  B. Sabel,et al.  Vision-related quality of life in first stroke patients with homonymous visual field defects , 2010, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[60]  R. Massof,et al.  Perceived visual ability for independent mobility in persons with retinitis pigmentosa. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.