Impact of infusion method on amikacin serum levels in humans.

Aminoglycosides are broad-spectrum antibiotics with peak-dependent bactericidal activity, administered by gravity infusion or for more accuracy by electronic pump infusion. The aim of this study was to assess the difference between the two systems and its pharmacokinetic impact. Twenty-four patients hospitalised for community-acquired pulmonary infections received amikacin by IV route over 1 h with a targeted peak concentration of 35 mg/L. They were randomly distributed into two groups, one receiving infusion through a pump system, the other by gravity. Amikacin serum levels were determined at the end of infusion and 24 h later. C(max) values were significantly lower with gravity than pump (40.2 +/- 12.3 vs. 50.6 +/- 17.6 mg/L, respectively; p = 0.04). Elimination half-life time, volume of distribution and clearance did not differ significantly from one group to the other. The percentage of patients who failed to achieve the targeted peak concentration was significantly higher with gravity than pump (41.7% vs. 16.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). Improving infusion flow-rate provides better control over amikacin C(max). This study underlines the fact that infusion device characteristics should be added to the physiopathological information of a patient if we are to make a better estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters.

[1]  R. Moore,et al.  Association of aminoglycoside plasma levels with therapeutic outcome in gram-negative pneumonia. , 1984, The American journal of medicine.

[2]  M. Tod,et al.  Individualising Aminoglycoside Dosage Regimens after Therapeutic Drug Monitoring , 2001, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[3]  W. Craig,et al.  Once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing of aminoglycosides. , 1995, Journal of chemotherapy.

[4]  A. Traynor,et al.  Aminoglycoside dosing weight correction factors for patients of various body sizes , 1995, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[5]  A. Shibl,et al.  Efficacy and safety of once-daily amikacin in combination with ceftazidime in critically ill adults with severe gram-negative infections. , 1996, Journal of chemotherapy.

[6]  P. Marik,et al.  A prospective randomized study comparing once- versus twice-daily amikacin dosing in critically ill adult and paediatric patients. , 1991, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[7]  A. Levey,et al.  A More Accurate Method To Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate from Serum Creatinine: A New Prediction Equation , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  F. Bacopoulou,et al.  A study of once-daily amikacin with low peak target concentrations in intensive care unit patients: pharmacokinetics and associated outcomes. , 2003, Journal of critical care.

[9]  L. Bauer,et al.  Applied Clinical Pharmacokinetics , 2001 .

[10]  M Ziser,et al.  Regulating intravenous fluid flow: controller versus clamps. , 1979, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[11]  P. Marquet,et al.  Population pharmacokinetics of amikacin in geriatric patients studied with the NPEM-2 algorithm. , 1997, International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[12]  J. Rotschafer,et al.  Wide interpatient variations in gentamicin dose requirements for geriatric patients. , 1982, JAMA.

[13]  C. Chidiac,et al.  Clinical and bacteriological efficacy, and practical aspects of amikacin given once daily for severe infections. , 1991, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[14]  C. Gérard,et al.  Pharmacocinétique de l’amikacine chez l’adulte : une hétérogénéité qui remet en cause le calcul de la dose basé sur le poids , 2009 .

[15]  R. Tight,et al.  Comparison of once-daily versus pharmacokinetic dosing of aminoglycosides in elderly patients. , 1996, The American journal of medicine.

[16]  R. Crass,et al.  In vivo accuracy of gravity-flow i.v. infusion systems. , 1985, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[17]  R. Cipolle,et al.  Kinetic model for gentamicin dosing with the use of individual patient parameters , 1977, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[18]  M. Vasko,et al.  Accuracy of Bayesian and Sawchuk-Zaske dosing methods for gentamicin. , 1986, Clinical pharmacy.