The importance of processing automaticity and temporary storage capacity to the differences in comprehension between skilled and less skilled college-age deaf readers.

The prevalence of low comprehension among deaf readers has been documented for decades, yet the problem persists. Progress has been hampered by uncertainty regarding which aspects of reading competence ought to be the primary focus of concerted instructional efforts. This article examines whether temporary storage capacity and/or processing automaticity may explain the difference in comprehension between skilled and less skilled adult deaf readers. Temporary storage capacity is the ability to maintain separate bits of information in current memory while they are being processed. Processing automaticity is the ability to complete certain basic operations of reading, such as recognizing individual words and chunking sets of words into meaningful phrases, with a minimum of intentional mental effort. In this study one group of deaf adults reading at the college level and another reading at the 5th-grade level completed a battery of experimental tasks that generated multiple indicators of storage capacity and automaticity. These included the reading span task of Daneman and Carpenter (1980), an analogous addition span task, two measures of phonological processing, and a sentence-reading task that varied the demands on temporary storage and processing automaticity. Results suggest that skilled readers do not command an exceptionally large temporary storage capacity, nor do less skilled readers suffer from deficient storage capacity. The indicators of processing automaticity suggest, however, that less skilled readers must invest significantly more conscious mental effort than skilled readers to complete basic operations of reading. These findings are applied to theory related to (a) the nature of the breakdowns in comprehension faced by readers with low automaticity, (b) the interaction of low automaticity with other obstacles to comprehension, and (c) the design of practice experiences to increase the automaticity and ultimately the comprehension of deaf readers.

[1]  I. Fischler,et al.  Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[2]  L. Kelly,et al.  Considerations for Designing Practice for Deaf Readers , 2022 .

[3]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Diane Lillo-Martin,et al.  Deaf readers' comprehension of relative clause structures , 1992, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[5]  W Garrison,et al.  Working memory capacity and comprehension processes in deaf readers. , 1997, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[6]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Language Comprehension in Language-Learning Impaired Children Improved with Acoustically Modified Speech , 1996, Science.

[7]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[8]  L. Kelly,et al.  Using silent motion pictures to teach complex syntax to adult deaf readers. , 1998, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[9]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[10]  C. Perfetti.  The Representation Problem in Reading Acquisition , 1992 .

[11]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Do developmental changes in digit span result from acquisition strategies , 1983 .

[12]  L. Wauters,et al.  Sign Facilitation in Word Recognition , 2001 .

[13]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Reading optimally builds on spoken language: implications for deaf readers. , 2000, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[14]  E. B. Huey.  The Psychology And Pedagogy Of Reading , 1908 .

[15]  M. Just,et al.  The psychology of reading and language comprehension , 1986 .

[16]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  Development of the ability to read words: Update. , 1994 .

[17]  E. D. H. join,et al.  Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know , 1987 .

[18]  M. Gaustad.  Morphographic analysis as a word identification strategy for deaf readers. , 2000, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[19]  U. Frith.  A developmental framework for developmental dyslexia , 1986, Annals of dyslexia.

[20]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[21]  G. Logan.  Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanisms? , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  R. Kretschmer,et al.  The instantiation of general terms by deaf adolescents/adults. , 1987, Journal of communication disorders.

[23]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[24]  C. Fowler,et al.  Phonological coding in word reading: Evidence from hearing and deaf readers , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Steven L. Miller,et al.  Temporal Processing Deficits of Language-Learning Impaired Children Ameliorated by Training , 1996, Science.

[26]  B. Davey,et al.  The Relationship between Lexical Knowledge and Reading Comprehension for Prelingually, Profoundly Hearing-Impaired Students. , 1987 .

[27]  U. Goswami,et al.  Strengths and weaknesses of the reading level design: A comment on Backman, Mamen, and Ferguson. , 1986 .

[28]  R. Engle,et al.  Is working memory capacity task dependent , 1989 .

[29]  A Ensor,et al.  The effect of the method of repeated readings on the reading rate and word recognition accuracy of deaf adolescents. , 1997, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[30]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes , 1968, Psychology of Learning and Motivation.

[31]  L. Kelly,et al.  Recall of English Function Words and Inflections by Skilled and Average Deaf Readers , 1993, American annals of the deaf.

[32]  Carol Padden,et al.  Reading Ability in Signing Deaf Children. , 1998 .

[33]  L. Kelly,et al.  Processing of Bottom-up and Top-Down Information by Skilled and Average Deaf Readers and Implications for Whole Language Instruction , 1995 .

[34]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Discourse Comprehension and Sources of Individual Differences. , 1977 .

[35]  R. Case,et al.  Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span , 1982 .

[36]  Frank R. Yekovich,et al.  Script-based inferences: Effects of text and knowledge variables on recognition memory , 1984 .

[37]  J. Woolley,et al.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  H. Harlow,et al.  The History and Philosophy of Knowledge of the Brain and its Functions , 1960, Neurology.

[39]  L. Kelly,et al.  The interaction of syntactic competence and vocabulary during reading by deaf students. , 1996, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[40]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[41]  Maria de la Luz Reyes,et al.  Challenging Venerable Assumptions: Literacy Instruction for Linguistically Different Students , 1992 .

[42]  D. Mook,et al.  In defense of external invalidity. , 1983 .

[43]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .