Achieving positive social identity: Social mobility, social creativity, and permeability of group boundaries.

Three experiments examined 5 hypotheses of social identity theory ( H. Tajfel & J. C. Turner, 1979 ) concerning social mobility and social creativity strategies and how permeability of group boundaries affects strategy use. As predicted, members of negatively distinctive in-groups distanced themselves psychologically from the in-group (social mobility), rated the distinguishing dimension as less undesirable (social creativity), and rated the in-group more favorably on other dimensions (social creativity ) than did members of nondistinctive in-groups. Also as predicted, social creativity strategies were more likely to be used when group boundaries were impermeable rather than permeable. Permeability effects on social mobility strategies were more complex than predicted. Additional findings shed light on relationships among identity-enhancement strategies and on how dimensions are chosen to flatter a negatively distinctive in-group.

[1]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. , 1991 .

[2]  van Knippenberg,et al.  The social dimension: Intergroup differences in group perceptions , 1984 .

[3]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[4]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[5]  Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. , 1993 .

[6]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. , 1993 .

[7]  H. Schreiber,et al.  Better or just different? Positive social identity by discrimination against, or by differentiation from outgroups , 1983 .

[8]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. , 1990, The British journal of social psychology.

[9]  B. Simon,et al.  Better or different? III. The impact of importance of comparison dimension and relative in-group size upon intergroup discrimination. , 1989 .

[10]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The exit of social mobility and the voice of social change : Notes on the social psychology of intergroup relations , 1975 .

[11]  H. Tajfel.  Social identity and intergroup behaviour , 1974 .

[12]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[13]  T. Willemsen,et al.  Ethnic minorities : social psychological perspectives , 1989 .

[14]  A. Mummendey,et al.  ‘Different‘ just means ‘better’: Some obvious and some hidden pathways to in‐group favouritism , 1984 .

[15]  A. Mummendey,et al.  Social comparison, similarity and ingroup favouritism-A replication , 1984 .

[16]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Disadvantaged group responses to perceived inequality: from passive acceptance to collective action , 1987 .

[17]  A. Knippenberg,et al.  Social identity and equity concerns in intergroup perceptions , 1984 .

[18]  M. Brewer,et al.  In-Group Identification as a Function of Depersonalization, Distinctiveness, and Status , 1993 .

[19]  R. Lalonde,et al.  Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. , 1994 .

[20]  R. Lalonde.  The Dynamics of Group Differentiation in the Face of Defeat , 1992 .

[21]  Michael Gold.  Social Dimension , 2020, The International Encyclopedia of Higher Education Systems and Institutions.

[22]  Brian Mullen,et al.  Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration , 1992 .

[23]  H. Tajfel.  Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. , 1978 .

[24]  R L Helmreich,et al.  Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  J. Polivy,et al.  The Effect of Perceived Smoking Status on Attractiveness , 1979 .

[26]  C. D. Hoffman,et al.  Gender stereotyping in young children: Evidence to support a concept-learning approach , 1986 .

[27]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[28]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Theoretical contributions: A five‐stage model of intergroup relations , 1984 .

[29]  A. van Knippenberg,et al.  Social identification and permeability of group boundaries , 1988 .

[30]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group : from acceptance to collective protest , 1990 .