Trustworthy agents for B2B operations under Normative environment

Agents intending to be involved in joint B2B operations need to rely on trust measures pointing to possible future solid and secure partnerships. Using Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) as a paradigm for an electronic institution framework enables both to simulate and facilitate the process of autonomous agents, as either enterprises or individual representatives, reaching joint agreements through automatic negotiation. In the heart of the MAS-based electronic institution framework, a Normative Environment provides monitoring capabilities and enforcement mechanisms influencing agents' behavior during joint activities. Moreover, it makes available relevant data that can be important for building up contextual-dependent agent's trust models which, consequently, also influence future possible negotiations leading to new and safer agreements. To support agents information generation, monitoring and fusion, we here present ANTE platform, a software MAS integrating Trust models with negotiation facilities and Normative environments, for the creation and monitoring of agent-based networks.

[1]  Eugénio C. Oliveira,et al.  Electronic institutions for B2B: dynamic normative environments , 2008, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[2]  Eugénio C. Oliveira,et al.  Making Electronic Contracting Operational and Trustworthy , 2010, IBERAMIA.

[3]  Eugénio C. Oliveira,et al.  A Context-Based Institutional Normative Environment , 2009, COIN@AAMAS&AAAI.

[4]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies , 2001, Springer Netherlands.

[5]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  A Socio-cognitive Perspective of Trust , 2013 .

[6]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  ANTE: Agreement Negotiation in Normative and Trust-Enabled Environments , 2012, PAAMS.

[7]  C. Castelfranchi,et al.  Social Trust : A Cognitive Approach , 2000 .

[8]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  A Dynamic Agents' Behavior Model for Computational Trust , 2011, EPIA.

[9]  J. Ross Quinlan,et al.  Induction of Decision Trees , 1986, Machine Learning.

[10]  Jordi Sabater-Mir,et al.  Repage: REPutation and ImAGE Among Limited Autonomous Partners , 2006, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[11]  E. Oliveira Software agents: Can we trust them? , 2012, 2012 IEEE 16th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES).

[12]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  The Construction of Social Reality , 1999 .

[13]  Andrew J. I. Jones,et al.  Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies , 2001 .

[14]  M. J. Urbano A Situation-aware and Social Computational Trust Model , 2013 .

[15]  Eugénio C. Oliveira,et al.  Social control in a normative framework: An adaptive deterrence approach , 2011, Web Intell. Agent Syst..

[16]  Martin Reh Multidimensional Context Representations for Situational Trust , 2006 .

[17]  Ana Paula Rocha,et al.  Computing Confidence Values: Does Trust Dynamics Matter? , 2009, EPIA.

[18]  Jordi Sabater-Mir,et al.  REGRET: reputation in gregarious societies , 2001, AGENTS '01.

[19]  Andrea Omicini,et al.  Environment as a first class abstraction in multiagent systems , 2007, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[20]  Marc Esteva,et al.  AMELI: an agent-based middleware for electronic institutions , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[21]  Jordi Sabater-Mir,et al.  On the integration of trust with negotiation, argumentation and semantics , 2014, Knowl. Eng. Rev..

[22]  Rino Falcone,et al.  Facing Openness with Socio-Cognitive Trust and Categories , 2011, IJCAI.

[23]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonoumous Agents and Multi Agent Systems , 2004 .

[24]  Theodosis Dimitrakos,et al.  System Models, e-Risks and e-Trust - Towards bridging the gap? , 2001, I3E.

[25]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Intention is Choice with Commitment , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[26]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  Modeling Agents and Their Environment , 2002, AOSE.