Pictorial Perspective: Perception of Size, Linear, and Texture Perspective in Children and Adults

Perception of size, linear, and texture perspective was investigated in third-grade and sixth-grade children and in college adults in three separate studies. A matching task required the observer to choose from a set of four alternative real scenes the correct match for the test stimulus, which was either a picture or a real scene. Correct performance required that the subject utilize perspective information for both size and distance relations. Erroneous choices available to the subject indicated errors in size judgment, in distance judgment, or in both simultaneously. View was either restricted at the correct station point or was free, with head motion. There were no significant effects of grade level. For all three groups, mean percent correct was nearly 100% with the real-scene test stimuli, and significantly below the chance level with the picture test stimuli. Errors in size judgment occurred most frequently, indicating that the geometrically correct rate of perspective convergence was too rapid to be seen by the subjects as perceptually acceptable. With size-perspective information alone, the number of size plus distance errors also increased significantly. There was no significant effect of viewing condition.

[1]  A Yonas,et al.  Effects of static and motion parallax depth information on perception of size in children and adults. , 1973, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[2]  H. McGurk,et al.  Pictorial depth perception: a developmental study. , 1974, British journal of psychology.

[3]  H. Sedgwick The visible horizon: A potential source of visual information for the perception of size and distance. , 1973 .

[4]  J. Kennedy A psychology of picture perception , 1974 .

[5]  E. Gibson Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[6]  F. Attneave,et al.  The determination of perceived tridimensional orientation by minimum criteria , 1969 .

[7]  M. Hagen,et al.  Picture perception: toward a theoretical model. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  The psychophysics of pictorial perception , 1962 .

[9]  T. G. R. Bower,et al.  Stimulus Variables Determining Space Perception in Infants , 1965, Science.

[10]  H McGurk,et al.  The development of pictorial depth perception: the role of figural elevation. , 1974, British journal of psychology.

[11]  Harold Schlosberg,et al.  Stereoscopic Depth from Single Pictures , 1941 .

[12]  T G Bower,et al.  The visual world of infants. , 1966, Scientific American.

[13]  James J. Gibson,et al.  MOTION PICTURE TESTING AND RESEARCH , 1947 .

[14]  James J. Gibson,et al.  The Information Available in Pictures , 1971 .

[15]  M. Hagen,et al.  Problems with picture perception: a reply to Rosinski. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  R. J. Miller Cross-cultural research in the perception of pictorial materials. , 1973, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Margaret A. Hagen,et al.  An investigation of the relationship between viewing condition and preference for true and modified linear perspective with adults. , 1976 .

[18]  R. R. Rosinski,et al.  Picture perception and monocular vision: a reply to Hagen. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  J. Gibson What is a form? , 1951, Psychological review.