Analysis of Five High School Biology Textbooks Used in the United States for Inclusion of the Nature of Science

Five high school biology textbooks were examined to determine the inclusion of four aspects of the nature of science: (a) science as a body of knowledge, (b) science as a way of investigating, (c) science as a way of thinking, and (d) science and its interactions with technology and society. The textbooks analyzed were BSCS Biology—A Human Approach (Kendall/Hunt), BSCS Biology—An Ecological Approach (Kendall/Hunt), Biology—The Dynamics of Life (Glencoe), Modern Biology (Holt), and Prentice Hall Biology (Prentice Hall). The same six chapters or sections were analyzed in each textbook, which were the methods of science, cells, heredity, DNA, evolution, and ecology. A scoring procedure was used that resulted, for the most part, in good intercoder agreement with Cohen’s kappa values ranging from 0.36–1.00. The five recently published biology textbooks in the United States have a better balance of presenting biology with respect to the four themes of science literacy used in this research than those analyzed 15 years ago, especially with regard to devoting more text to engaging students in finding out answers, gathering information, and learning how scientists go about their work. Therefore, these biology textbooks are incorporating national science education reform guides that recommend a more authentic view of the scientific enterprise than similar textbooks used 15 years ago.

[1]  L. Love-Gregory,et al.  Forbidden knowledge , 2003, Science and engineering ethics.

[2]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[3]  Thomas R. Koballa,et al.  Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary Schools: Developing Fundamental Knowledge and Skills , 2005 .

[4]  Eugene L. Chiappetta,et al.  Do middle school life science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy themes , 1993 .

[5]  William F. McComas,et al.  THE PRINCIPAL ELEMENTS OF THE NATURE OF SCIENCE: DISPELLING THE MYTHS , 1998 .

[6]  Ronald T. Brown,et al.  An evaluation of the validity of the diagnostic category of attention deficit disorder. , 1984, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[7]  William H. Schmidt,et al.  According to the Book , 2002 .

[8]  Dorothy B. Rosenthal.  Social Issues in High School Biology Textbooks: 1963-1983. , 1984 .

[9]  M. R. Matthews.  Science teaching : the role of history and philosophy of science , 1994 .

[10]  J. Lagowski.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[11]  F. Rutherford.  The role of inquiry in science teaching , 1964 .

[12]  渋江 靖弘,et al.  Science for All Americans , 1990 .

[13]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science , 2002 .

[14]  Andrew T. Lumpe,et al.  A Profile of High School Biology Textbooks Using Scientific Literacy Recommendations , 1996 .

[15]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature , 2000 .

[16]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  What have we learned about increasing the meaningfulness of science prose , 1983 .

[17]  Mary Ratcliffe,et al.  What “ideas‐about‐science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community , 2003 .

[18]  A. Ahlgren,et al.  Science for all Americans , 1990 .

[19]  Erik Knain.  Ideologies in school science textbooks , 2001 .

[20]  Gilbert A. Valverde.  According to the Book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks , 2002 .

[21]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[22]  L. E. Klopfer,et al.  Actions in a time of crisis , 1982 .

[23]  Richard A. Duschl,et al.  Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development , 1990 .

[24]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[25]  Eugene L. Chiappetta,et al.  A quantitative analysis of high school chemistry textbooks for scientific literacy themes and expository learning aids , 1991 .

[26]  W. Holliday.  Comment: Methodological concerns about AAAS's Project 2061 study of science textbooks , 2003 .

[27]  The coverage of evolution in high school biology textbooks published in the 1980s , 1984 .

[28]  Norman G. Lederman.  Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[29]  Jo Ellen Roseman,et al.  How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review , 2002 .

[30]  Marlow Ediger,et al.  Teaching Science as Inquiry. , 1998 .

[31]  Alton L. Biggs,et al.  Biology: The Dynamics of Life , 1991 .

[32]  V. Koulaidis,et al.  A pedagogical analysis of science textbooks: How can we proceed? , 1996 .

[33]  James T. Robinson.  The nature of science and science teaching , 1968 .

[34]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[35]  G. Skoog.  Topic of evolution in secondary school biology textbooks: 1900-1977 , 1979 .

[36]  Peter J. Fensham.  A research base for new objectives of science teaching , 1980 .

[37]  B Commoner,et al.  A Modern Biology , 1961, Nature.

[38]  Jo Ellen Roseman,et al.  Can Middle-School Science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life Science , 2004 .

[39]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Classroom factors related to changes in students' conceptions of the nature of science , 1985 .

[40]  Joseph S. Levine,et al.  Prentice Hall Biology , 2003 .

[41]  P. Brandwein,et al.  Memorandum, on renewing schooling and education , 1981 .

[42]  H. Emmett Brown,et al.  Association for the education of teachers in science , 1957 .

[43]  Leopold E. Klopfer,et al.  The teaching of science and the history of science , 1969 .

[44]  Eugene L. Chiappetta,et al.  A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks , 1991 .

[45]  William F. McComas,et al.  The nature of science in science education : rationales and strategies , 1998 .

[46]  J. Olson,et al.  The Nature of Science in International Science Education Standards Documents , 1998 .

[47]  ASSESSMENT OF Standards-Based Biology Teaching , 2005 .

[48]  Richard Bascobert.  BSCS Biology: A Human Approach , 2004 .

[49]  Robert E. Yager,et al.  What Research Says to the Science Teacher , 1978 .

[50]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .