Adding static printing capabilities to the EUV phase-shifting point diffraction interferometer

While interferometry is routinely used for the characterization and alignment of lithographic optics, the ultimate performance metric for these optics is printing in photoresist. Direct comparison of imaging and wavefront performance is also useful for verifying and improving the predictive power of wavefront metrology under actual printing conditions. To address these issues, static, small-field printing capabilities are being added to the extreme ultraviolet (EUV) phase-shifting point diffraction interferometer (PS/PDI) implemented at the Advanced Light Source at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. This Sub- field Exposure Station (SES) will enable the earliest possible imaging characterization of the upcoming Engineering Test Stand (ETS) Set-2 projection optics. Relevant printing studies with the ETS projection optics require illumination partial coherence with (sigma) of approximately 0.7. This (sigma) value is very different from the coherent illumination requirements of the EUV PS/PDI and the coherence properties naturally provided by synchrotron undulator beamline illumination. Adding printing capabilities to the PS/PDI experimental system thus necessitates the development of an alternative illumination system capable of destroying the inherent coherence of the beamline. The SES is being implemented with two independent illuminators: the first is based on a novel EUV diffuser currently under development and the second is based on a scanning mirror design. Here we describe the design and implementation of the new SES, including a discussion of the illuminators and the fabrication of the EUV diffuser.

[1]  J. Goodman Statistical Optics , 1985 .

[2]  N. Ceglio,et al.  Undulator radiation for at-wavelength interferometry of optics for extreme-ultraviolet lithography. , 1993, Applied optics.

[3]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  EUV interferometry of a four-mirror ring-field EUV optical system , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  Extreme ultraviolet interferometric measurements of diffraction-limited optics , 1999 .

[5]  J. Underwood,et al.  Layered synthetic microstructures as Bragg diffractors for X rays and extreme ultraviolet: theory and predicted performance. , 1981, Applied optics.

[6]  Donald W. Sweeney,et al.  EUV optical design for a 100-nm CD imaging system , 1998, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  Sub-100-nm lithographic imaging with an EUV 10X microstepper , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  Characterization of an EUV Schwarzschild objective using phase-shifting point diffraction interferometry , 1997, Advanced Lithography.

[9]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  Extreme ultraviolet alignment and testing of a four-mirror ring field extreme ultraviolet optical system , 2000 .

[10]  Daniel G. Stearns,et al.  Stochastic model for thin film growth and erosion , 1993 .

[11]  S. H. Lee,et al.  Extreme-ultraviolet phase-shifting point-diffraction interferometer: a wave-front metrology tool with subangstrom reference-wave accuracy. , 1999, Applied optics.

[12]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  EUV engineering test stand , 2000, Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Kenneth A. Goldberg,et al.  Tunable coherent radiation in the soft X-ray and extreme ultraviolet spectral regions , 1999 .

[14]  Patrick P. Naulleau,et al.  Spatial coherence characterization of undulator radiation , 2000 .

[15]  J. Bokor,et al.  Phase-shifting point diffraction interferometer. , 1996, Optics letters.