Developing outcome measures for ambulatory care--an application to asthma and diabetes.

Increasing emphasis is now being placed on the assessment of patient outcomes, both in evaluating medical interventions and in quality assurance initiatives. Clinicians, purchasers, managers and researchers need outcome measures that are valid, reliable and responsive. This paper describes the theory and practice underlying the development of outcome measures for two chronic conditions, asthma and diabetes, for application in ambulatory settings. Existing generic and condition-specific health status and health-related quality-of-life measures were administered to almost 1300 patients. The psychometric properties of these measures were examined to identify those that were of adequate validity and reliability in these population groups. Step-wise regression procedures were then used to identify a core set of scales that best predicted patients' general health perceptions, which could be used in measuring general health outcomes for each of these groups. These core sets consist of up to 40 items, spanning physical function, energy and vitality, emotional well-being and condition-specific aspects of health such as symptom control. Further analysis is being carried out to assess the responsiveness to change of these core item sets.

[1]  A. Bowling Measuring Health. A review of quality of life measurement scales , 1997 .

[2]  D. House,et al.  Chronic respiratory disease: in military inductees and parents of schoolchildren. , 1973, Archives of environmental health.

[3]  I. McDowell,et al.  Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 3rd ed. , 2006 .

[4]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[5]  M. Eccles,et al.  Development of a symptom based outcome measure for asthma , 1994, BMJ.

[6]  A. Williams EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[7]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[8]  A. Hutchinson,et al.  Outcome measures for primary health care: what are the research priorities? , 1992, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[9]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[10]  R. Deyo,et al.  Generic and Disease-Specific Measures in Assessing Health Status and Quality of Life , 1989, Medical care.

[11]  D. Patrick,et al.  Disablement in the Community , 1989 .

[12]  Sheldon Greenfield,et al.  Functional Status Measurement in Primary Care , 1990, Frontiers of Primary Care.

[13]  Edward B. Perrin,et al.  The Medical Outcomes Study. An application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care , 1989 .

[14]  R. Snaith,et al.  The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale , 1983 .

[15]  L. Rubenstein,et al.  Systematic biases in functional status assessment of elderly adults: effects of different data sources. , 1984, Journal of gerontology.

[16]  A. Frater,et al.  Health status, outcome, and attributability: is a red rose red in the dark? , 1993, Quality in health care : QHC.

[17]  H. Harman Modern factor analysis , 1961 .

[18]  A. Stewart,et al.  Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[19]  David Wilkin,et al.  Measures of Need and Outcome for Primary Health Care , 1992 .

[20]  C. Tse,et al.  Development of the 17-item Duke Health Profile. , 1991, Family practice.

[21]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment. , 1992, BMJ.

[22]  M. Hyland,et al.  A scale for assessing quality of life in adult asthma sufferers. , 1991, Journal of psychosomatic research.