Effects of design parameters of total hip components on the impingement angle and determination of the preferred liner skirt shape with an adequate oscillation angle

The oscillation angle (OsA), which is the sum of the impingement angles on the two sides when the prosthetic neck sways from the neutral axis of the acetabular cup to the liner rim, is one of the most important factors that can affect the range of motion of an artificial hip joint. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of total hip component design on the impingement angle. Our findings show that an increase in cup depth of the liner restricts the motion of the neck and results in a reduced impingement angle, while an increase in chamfer angle increases the impingement angle until it reaches a critical value when a further increase no longer results in an increase in impingement angle. The impingement angle is not only dependent on the head/neck ratio, but also on the head size itself. For most arbitrarily chosen cup depths and chamfer angles, the neck only impacts at one point on the liner. This study proposes a suitable combination of cup depth and chamfer angle and a preferred impact mode, which, if impingement does occur, enables the neck to impinge on the liner rim over a large area. Cup–neck combinations that have an adequate OsA with maximum femoral head coverage are presented.

[1]  M. Conditt,et al.  Does neck/liner impingement increase wear of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene liners? , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  R. Bader,et al.  Differences between the wear couples metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic in the stability against dislocation of total hip replacement , 2004, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[3]  B F Morrey,et al.  The Elevated-Rim Acetabular Liner in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relationship to Postoperative Dislocation* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  J Fisher,et al.  Wear and deformation of ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip replacements with joint laxity and swing phase microseparation , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[5]  L.-j. Yuan,et al.  Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty , 1999, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[6]  D. D’Lima,et al.  The Effect of the Orientation of the Acetabular and Femoral Components on the Range of Motion of the Hip at Different Head-Neck Ratios* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  T. Wright,et al.  Dislocation following THA: comparison of two acetabular component designs. , 1993, Orthopedics.

[8]  James Shih-Shyn Wu,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of wear formulae for acetabular cup liners , 2010, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[9]  James Shih-Shyn Wu,et al.  Wear patterns of, and wear volume formulae for, hemispherical acetabular cup liners , 2010 .

[10]  Shantanu Patil,et al.  Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject‐specific approach , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  Natalia Nuño,et al.  Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  T. Bauer,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of Multiple Wear Vectors in Retrieved Acetabular Cups* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  Yong-San Yoon,et al.  Optimal orientation of implanted components in total hip arthroplasty with polyethylene on metal articulation. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  Fumihiro Yoshimine,et al.  A mathematical formula to calculate the theoretical range of motion for total hip replacement. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Daniel Kluess,et al.  Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  Fumihiro Yoshimine,et al.  The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  James Shih-Shyn Wu,et al.  Wear patterns of, and wear volume formulae for, cylindrically elongated acetabular cup liners , 2010, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[18]  B. Morrey,et al.  Effect of the Elevated-Rim Acetabular Liner on Loosening after Total Hip Arthroplasty* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  Aditya Maheshwari,et al.  Impingement with total hip replacement. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  W. Harris,et al.  Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  M. Royle,et al.  Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  E. Lingard,et al.  Hip flexion after Birmingham hip resurfacing: role of cup anteversion, anterior femoral head-neck offset, and head-neck ratio. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  T D Brown,et al.  A Finite Element Analysis of Factors Influencing Total Hip Dislocation , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  G Wavreille,et al.  Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion. , 2012, Clinical Biomechanics.

[25]  Yasuharu Nakashima,et al.  Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[26]  Fumihiro Yoshimine,et al.  The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  W. Hutton,et al.  Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion. , 1997, Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association.

[28]  Jian-Horng Chen,et al.  Wear analysis of chamfered elongated acetabular cup liners , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[29]  I. Clarke,et al.  How do alternative bearing surfaces influence wear behavior? , 2008, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[30]  P. Pellicci,et al.  Dislodgment of Polyethylene Liners in First and Second-Generation Harris-Galante Acetabular Components: A Report of Eighteen Cases , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  R. Barrack,et al.  Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Implant Design and Orientation , 2003, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[32]  The effect of component design on range of motion to impingement in total hip arthroplasty. , 2001, Instructional course lectures.