Effects of design parameters of total hip components on the impingement angle and determination of the preferred liner skirt shape with an adequate oscillation angle
暂无分享,去创建一个
Wei-Min Chi | Jian-Horng Chen | Hsiao-Che Lin | Ying-Jui Ho | Jian-Horng Chen | Y. Ho | W. Chi | Hsiao-Che Lin
[1] M. Conditt,et al. Does neck/liner impingement increase wear of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene liners? , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[2] R. Bader,et al. Differences between the wear couples metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-ceramic in the stability against dislocation of total hip replacement , 2004, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.
[3] B F Morrey,et al. The Elevated-Rim Acetabular Liner in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Relationship to Postoperative Dislocation* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[4] J Fisher,et al. Wear and deformation of ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip replacements with joint laxity and swing phase microseparation , 2003, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.
[5] L.-j. Yuan,et al. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty , 1999, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.
[6] D. D’Lima,et al. The Effect of the Orientation of the Acetabular and Femoral Components on the Range of Motion of the Hip at Different Head-Neck Ratios* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[7] T. Wright,et al. Dislocation following THA: comparison of two acetabular component designs. , 1993, Orthopedics.
[8] James Shih-Shyn Wu,et al. Evaluating the accuracy of wear formulae for acetabular cup liners , 2010, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.
[9] James Shih-Shyn Wu,et al. Wear patterns of, and wear volume formulae for, hemispherical acetabular cup liners , 2010 .
[10] Shantanu Patil,et al. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject‐specific approach , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.
[11] Natalia Nuño,et al. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.
[12] T. Bauer,et al. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Multiple Wear Vectors in Retrieved Acetabular Cups* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[13] Yong-San Yoon,et al. Optimal orientation of implanted components in total hip arthroplasty with polyethylene on metal articulation. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.
[14] Fumihiro Yoshimine,et al. A mathematical formula to calculate the theoretical range of motion for total hip replacement. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.
[15] Daniel Kluess,et al. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.
[16] Fumihiro Yoshimine,et al. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.
[17] James Shih-Shyn Wu,et al. Wear patterns of, and wear volume formulae for, cylindrically elongated acetabular cup liners , 2010, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.
[18] B. Morrey,et al. Effect of the Elevated-Rim Acetabular Liner on Loosening after Total Hip Arthroplasty* , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[19] Aditya Maheshwari,et al. Impingement with total hip replacement. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[20] W. Harris,et al. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[21] M. Royle,et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[22] E. Lingard,et al. Hip flexion after Birmingham hip resurfacing: role of cup anteversion, anterior femoral head-neck offset, and head-neck ratio. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[23] T D Brown,et al. A Finite Element Analysis of Factors Influencing Total Hip Dislocation , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[24] G Wavreille,et al. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion. , 2012, Clinical Biomechanics.
[25] Yasuharu Nakashima,et al. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[26] Fumihiro Yoshimine,et al. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.
[27] W. Hutton,et al. Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion. , 1997, Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association.
[28] Jian-Horng Chen,et al. Wear analysis of chamfered elongated acetabular cup liners , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.
[29] I. Clarke,et al. How do alternative bearing surfaces influence wear behavior? , 2008, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
[30] P. Pellicci,et al. Dislodgment of Polyethylene Liners in First and Second-Generation Harris-Galante Acetabular Components: A Report of Eighteen Cases , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[31] R. Barrack,et al. Dislocation After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Implant Design and Orientation , 2003, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
[32] The effect of component design on range of motion to impingement in total hip arthroplasty. , 2001, Instructional course lectures.