A flexible approach for coupling NURBS patches in rotationless isogeometric analysis of Kirchhoff-Love shells

Abstract This paper presents a flexible method for coupling NURBS patches in isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love shell analysis. The required C 1 -continuity in such a shell formulation significantly complicates the patch coupling (as compared to typical C 0 -cases). In the present work, the C 0 -part of the coupling is a global coupling in a weak sense, whereas the C 1 -continuity is enforced by a strong point-wise coupling in well-chosen collocation points along the interface. The coupling conditions can be derived using only mesh information, without the need for suitable penalty or stabilisation parameters. They are expressed using a master–slave formulation between the interface variables. A static condensation approach to enforce these continuity constraints results in a reduced system matrix. The proposed method can be employed for both conforming and non-conforming patch configurations, and for G 1 -continuous structures as well as for patches meeting at a kink. This is demonstrated for a set of problems of (dynamic) shell analysis, including both eigenvalue and boundary-value problems.

[1]  W. Dornisch,et al.  An efficient and robust rotational formulation for isogeometric Reissner–Mindlin shell elements , 2016 .

[2]  Roger A. Sauer,et al.  A new rotation-free isogeometric thin shell formulation and a corresponding continuity constraint for patch boundaries , 2017 .

[3]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A review of shell finite elements and corotational theories , 1995 .

[4]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[5]  Ralf Müller,et al.  Dual and approximate dual basis functions for B-splines and NURBS – Comparison and application for an efficient coupling of patches with the isogeometric mortar method , 2017 .

[6]  Wim Desmet,et al.  A performance study of NURBS-based isogeometric analysis for interior two-dimensional time-harmonic acoustics , 2016 .

[7]  Alfio Quarteroni,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis and error estimates for high order partial differential equations in Fluid Dynamics , 2014 .

[8]  Les A. Piegl,et al.  The NURBS Book , 1995, Monographs in Visual Communication.

[9]  Ernst Rank,et al.  Weak coupling for isogeometric analysis of non-matching and trimmed multi-patch geometries , 2014 .

[10]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  Treatment of Reissner–Mindlin shells with kinks without the need for drilling rotation stabilization in an isogeometric framework , 2014 .

[11]  Onur Atak,et al.  A robust patch coupling method for NURBS-based isogeometric analysis of non-conforming multipatch surfaces , 2017 .

[12]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Studies of Refinement and Continuity in Isogeometric Structural Analysis (Preprint) , 2007 .

[13]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Finite element and NURBS approximations of eigenvalue, boundary-value, and initial-value problems , 2014 .

[14]  Onur Atak,et al.  An isogeometric indirect boundary element method for solving acoustic problems in open-boundary domains , 2017 .

[15]  Wim Desmet,et al.  Bloch theorem for isogeometric analysis of periodic problems governed by high-order partial differential equations , 2016 .

[16]  Laura De Lorenzis,et al.  The variational collocation method , 2016 .

[17]  Vinh Phu Nguyen,et al.  Isogeometric analysis: An overview and computer implementation aspects , 2012, Math. Comput. Simul..

[18]  Saeed Shojaee,et al.  Free vibration analysis of thin plates by using a NURBS-based isogeometric approach , 2012 .

[19]  T. Hughes,et al.  ISOGEOMETRIC COLLOCATION METHODS , 2010 .

[20]  Peter Betsch,et al.  Isogeometric analysis and domain decomposition methods , 2012 .

[21]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  The weak substitution method – an application of the mortar method for patch coupling in NURBS‐based isogeometric analysis , 2015 .

[22]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Isogeometric analysis of trimmed NURBS geometries , 2012 .

[23]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Some Applications of the Rank Revealing QR Factorization , 1992, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[24]  Wim Desmet,et al.  A lightweight vibro-acoustic metamaterial demonstrator: Numerical and experimental investigation , 2016 .

[25]  Stephen Demko,et al.  On the existence of interpolating projections onto spline spaces , 1985 .

[26]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Isogeometric shell analysis with Kirchhoff–Love elements , 2009 .

[27]  Yuri Bazilevs,et al.  The bending strip method for isogeometric analysis of Kirchhoff–Love shell structures comprised of multiple patches , 2010 .

[28]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Analysis in computer aided design: Nonlinear isogeometric B-Rep analysis of shell structures , 2015 .

[29]  E. Ramm,et al.  Models and finite elements for thin-walled structures , 2004 .

[30]  Martin Ruess,et al.  Nitsche’s method for a coupling of isogeometric thin shells and blended shell structures , 2015 .

[31]  M. Cox.  The Numerical Evaluation of B-Splines , 1972 .

[32]  P. Bouillard,et al.  Error estimation and adaptivity for the finite element method in acoustics: 2D and 3D applications , 1999 .

[33]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Advances in the formulation of the rotation-free basic shell triangle , 2005 .

[34]  Vinh Phu Nguyen,et al.  Nitsche’s method for two and three dimensional NURBS patch coupling , 2013, 1308.0802.

[35]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Isogeometric collocation: Cost comparison with Galerkin methods and extension to adaptive hierarchical NURBS discretizations , 2013 .

[36]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  Implicit dynamic analysis using an isogeometric Reissner–Mindlin shell formulation , 2017 .

[37]  Barbara Wohlmuth,et al.  Isogeometric mortar methods , 2014, 1407.8313.

[38]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Stress projection for membrane and shear locking in shell finite elements , 1985 .

[39]  Bert Jüttler,et al.  IETI – Isogeometric Tearing and Interconnecting , 2012, Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering.

[40]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis: Toward Integration of CAD and FEA , 2009 .

[41]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  Domain Decomposition Methods and Kirchhoff-Love Shell Multipatch Coupling in Isogeometric Analysis , 2015 .

[42]  Paulo M. Pimenta,et al.  A simple triangular finite element for nonlinear thin shells: statics, dynamics and anisotropy , 2017 .

[43]  Bernd Simeon,et al.  On penalty-free formulations for multipatch isogeometric Kirchhoff-Love shells , 2017, Math. Comput. Simul..

[44]  Roland Wüchner,et al.  A Nitsche‐type formulation and comparison of the most common domain decomposition methods in isogeometric analysis , 2014 .

[45]  Richard S. Falk,et al.  Locking-free finite elements for the Reissner-Mindlin plate , 2000, Math. Comput..

[46]  C. D. Boor,et al.  On Calculating B-splines , 1972 .

[47]  Michael C. H. Wu,et al.  Isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love shell formulations for general hyperelastic materials , 2015 .

[48]  Alessandro Reali,et al.  Isogeometric Analysis of Structural Vibrations , 2006 .