Networks of global bird invasion altered by regional trade ban

European Union’s ban on trade in wild-caught birds both reduces and redistributes bird invasion risk globally. Wildlife trade is a major pathway for introduction of invasive species worldwide. However, how exactly wildlife trade influences invasion risk, beyond the transportation of individuals to novel areas, remains unknown. We analyze the global trade network of wild-caught birds from 1995 to 2011 as reported by CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora). We found that before the European Union ban on imports of wild-caught birds, declared in 2005, invasion risk was closely associated with numbers of imported birds, diversity of import sources, and degree of network centrality of importer countries. After the ban, fluxes of global bird trade declined sharply. However, new trade routes emerged, primarily toward the Nearctic, Afrotropical, and Indo-Malay regions. Although regional bans can curtail invasion risk globally, to be fully effective and prevent rerouting of trade flows, bans should be global.

[1]  Ben Collen,et al.  The Global Distribution and Drivers of Alien Bird Species Richness , 2017, PLoS biology.

[2]  A. Møller,et al.  Using the BirdTree.org website to obtain robust phylogenies for avian comparative studies: A primer. , 2015, Current zoology.

[3]  I. Noble,et al.  The link between international trade and the global distribution of invasive alien species , 2008, Biological Invasions.

[4]  J. Eaton,et al.  Nothing to laugh about – the ongoing illegal trade in laughingthrushes (Garrulax species) in the bird markets of Java, Indonesia , 2016, Bird Conservation International.

[5]  Suyadi,et al.  Measuring the impact of the pet trade on Indonesian birds , 2017, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[6]  J. Olden,et al.  Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities , 2016, Nature Communications.

[7]  D. Paini,et al.  The role of global trade and transport network topology in the human-mediated dispersal of alien species. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[8]  S. Pires,et al.  The illegal parrot trade: a literature review , 2012 .

[9]  C. Shepherd,et al.  Shades of grey: the legal trade in CITES-listed birds in Singapore, notably the globally threatened African grey parrot Psittacus erithacus , 2016, Oryx.

[10]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[11]  S. Butchart,et al.  Ecological and socio-economic factors affecting extinction risk in parrots , 2016, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[12]  J. Bullock,et al.  Global trade networks determine the distribution of invasive non‐native species , 2017 .

[13]  P. Jepson,et al.  Bird-keeping in Indonesia: conservation impacts and the potential for substitution-based conservation responses , 2005, Oryx.

[14]  P. Jepson,et al.  The international wild bird trade: what's wrong with blanket bans? , 2005, Oryx.

[15]  Kirsten Conrad,et al.  Trade Bans: A Perfect Storm for Poaching? , 2012 .

[16]  Monica E. McGarrity,et al.  The influence of traditional Buddhist wildlife release on biological invasions , 2012 .

[17]  Robin Freeman,et al.  Emerging Network-Based Tools in Movement Ecology. , 2016, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  W. Jetz,et al.  The global diversity of birds in space and time , 2012, Nature.

[19]  Elizabeth L. Bennett,et al.  Wildlife Trade and Global Disease Emergence , 2005, Emerging infectious diseases.

[20]  K. Barton MuMIn : multi-model inference, R package version 0.12.0 , 2009 .

[21]  Wolfgang Nentwig,et al.  Socioeconomic legacy yields an invasion debt , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  I. MacGregor‐Fors,et al.  Pretty, but dangerous! Records of non-native Monk Parakeets (Myiopsitta monachus) in Mexico , 2011 .

[23]  M. Dyck,et al.  Unexpected and undesired conservation outcomes of wildlife trade bans—An emerging problem for stakeholders? , 2015 .

[24]  M. Plummer,et al.  CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC , 2006 .

[25]  L. Svensson,et al.  The Birds of the Western Palearctic , 1977 .

[26]  R. Thomson,et al.  Characterizing the trade of wild birds for merit release in Phnom Penh, Cambodia and associated risks to health and ecology , 2012 .

[27]  E. Webb,et al.  Tools and terms for understanding illegal wildlife trade , 2016 .

[28]  P. Lester,et al.  Corruption, development and governance indicators predict invasive species risk from trade , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  C. Lever Naturalized Birds of the World , 1988 .

[30]  T. Blackburn,et al.  Patterns of non-randomness in the composition and characteristics of the Taiwanese bird trade , 2014, Biological Invasions.

[31]  R. Freckleton,et al.  Unraveling the Life History of Successful Invaders , 2012, Science.

[32]  H. Mooney,et al.  Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[33]  D. Macmillan,et al.  Towards informed and multi-faceted wildlife trade interventions , 2015 .

[34]  Emma R Bush,et al.  Global Trade in Exotic Pets 2006–2012 , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[35]  P. Mahadevan,et al.  An overview , 2007, Journal of Biosciences.

[36]  C. Perrins,et al.  Birds of the Western Palearctic , 1978, Nature.

[37]  M. Carrete,et al.  Regional Bans on Wild‐Bird Trade Modify Invasion Risks at a Global Scale , 2017 .

[38]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide , 2017, Nature Communications.

[39]  E. Matthysen,et al.  Niche conservatism in non‐native birds in Europe: niche unfilling rather than niche expansion , 2013 .

[40]  M. Mascia,et al.  Discrepancies in Reported Levels of International Wildlife Trade , 2005 .

[41]  M. Carrete,et al.  Wild-bird trade and exotic invasions: a new link of conservation concern? , 2008 .

[42]  D. Richardson,et al.  Niche‐based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale , 2005, Global change biology.

[43]  H. Seebens,et al.  The dispersal of alien species redefines biogeography in the Anthropocene , 2015, Science.

[44]  J. Gagné Literature Review , 2018, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[45]  S. Kark,et al.  Human-related processes drive the richness of exotic birds in Europe , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[47]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[48]  Olivier Gimenez,et al.  Comparing parent–offspring regression with frequentist and Bayesian animal models to estimate heritability in wild populations: a simulation study for Gaussian and binary traits , 2013 .

[49]  P. Daszak,et al.  Reducing the Risks of the Wildlife Trade , 2009, Science.

[50]  G. Powell,et al.  Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth , 2001 .

[51]  M. Fortin,et al.  Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data , 2012 .

[52]  Jarrod Had MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package , 2010 .