Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

Background and Purpose— To present a systematic review of studies that addresses the effects of intensity of augmented exercise therapy time (AETT) on activities of daily living (ADL), walking, and dexterity in patients with stroke. Summary of Review— A database of articles published from 1966 to November 2003 was compiled from MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, DARE, and PiCarta using combinations of the following key words: stroke, cerebrovascular disorders, physical therapy, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, exercise therapy, rehabilitation, intensity, dose–response relationship, effectiveness, and randomized controlled trial. References presented in relevant publications were examined as well as abstracts in proceedings. Studies that satisfied the following selection criteria were included: (1) patients had a diagnosis of stroke; (2) effects of intensity of exercise training were investigated; and (3) design of the study was a randomized controlled trial (RCT). For each outcome measure, the estimated effect size (ES) and the summary effect size (SES) expressed in standard deviation units (SDU) were calculated for ADL, walking speed, and dexterity using fixed and random effect models. Correlation coefficients were calculated between observed individual effect sizes on ADL of each study, additional time spent on exercise training, and methodological quality. Cumulative meta-analyses (random effects model) adjusted for the difference in treatment intensity in each study was used for the trials evaluating the effects of AETT provided. Twenty of the 31 candidate studies, involving 2686 stroke patients, were included in the synthesis. The methodological quality ranged from 2 to 10 out of the maximum score of 14 points. The meta-analysis resulted in a small but statistically significant SES with regard to ADL measured at the end of the intervention phase. Further analysis showed a significant homogeneous SES for 17 studies that investigated effects of increased exercise intensity within the first 6 months after stroke. No significant SES was observed for the 3 studies conducted in the chronic phase. Cumulative meta-analysis strongly suggests that at least a 16-hour difference in treatment time between experimental and control groups provided in the first 6 months after stroke is needed to obtain significant differences in ADL. A significant SES supporting a higher intensity was also observed for instrumental ADL and walking speed, whereas no significant SES was found for dexterity. Conclusion— The results of the present research synthesis support the hypothesis that augmented exercise therapy has a small but favorable effect on ADL, particularly if therapy input is augmented at least 16 hours within the first 6 months after stroke. This meta-analysis also suggests that clinically relevant treatment effects may be achieved on instrumental ADL and gait speed.

[1]  C. Richards,et al.  Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Combining estimates of effect size. , 1994 .

[3]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  H. Feys,et al.  Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. , 1998, Stroke.

[5]  C. Richards,et al.  Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  Constraint-induced therapy for stroke: more of the same or something completely different? , 2001, Current opinion in neurology.

[7]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Can augmented physiotherapy input enhance recovery of mobility after stroke? A randomized controlled trial , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[8]  C Ballinger,et al.  Unpacking the black box of therapy – a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[9]  M. Dewey,et al.  A multicentre randomized controlled trial of leisure therapy and conventional occupational therapy after stroke , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better? , 1996, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[11]  P. Siemonsma,et al.  Occupational therapy for stroke patients not admitted to hospital: a randomised controlled trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[12]  A. Tennant,et al.  A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect of intensity of therapy upon length of stay in a neurological rehabilitation setting. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. , 1997, Stroke.

[14]  R. Keith,et al.  Acute and subacute rehabilitation for stroke: a comparison. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  P. Laycock,et al.  How much physical therapy for patients with stroke? , 1978, British medical journal.

[16]  D. Mclellan,et al.  The effects of increased rehabilitation therapy after brain injury: results of a prospective controlled trial , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[17]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Random‐Effects Model , 2003, Introduction to Meta‐Analysis.

[18]  D. Wade,et al.  Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  R. Ruff,et al.  Are stroke patients discharged sooner if in-patient rehabilitation services are provided seven v six days per week? , 1999, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[20]  D. Tinson,et al.  How stroke patients spend their days. An observational study of the treatment regime offered to patients in hospital with movement disorders following stroke. , 1989, International disability studies.

[21]  S. Studenski,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. , 2003, Stroke.

[22]  [Trends in epidemiology]. , 1977, Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Hygiene und ihre Grenzgebiete.

[23]  J. Gladman,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of enhanced Social Service occupational therapy for stroke patients , 1997, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  M. Mackenzie,et al.  Is dosage of physiotherapy a critical factor in deciding patterns of recovery from stroke: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. , 2000, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[25]  M Robinson,et al.  Effects of facilitation exercise techniques in stroke rehabilitation. , 1970, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[27]  R. Wagenaar,et al.  The long-term effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a research synthesis. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  C. Granger,et al.  Functional gains and therapy intensity during subacute rehabilitation: a study of 20 facilities. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  Stroke--1989. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report of the WHO Task Force on Stroke and other Cerebrovascular Disorders. , 1989, Stroke.

[30]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Treatment Interventions for the Paretic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Critical Review , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[31]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Domiciliary occupational therapy for patients with stroke discharged from hospital: randomised controlled trial , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[33]  D. Wade,et al.  Therapy after stroke: amounts, determinants and effects. , 1984, International rehabilitation medicine.

[34]  D. Wade,et al.  Physiotherapy intervention late after stroke and mobility. , 1992, BMJ.

[35]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[36]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Does the Organization of Postacute Stroke Care Really Matter? , 2001, Stroke.

[37]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. , 2003, Stroke.

[38]  R. Werner,et al.  Effectiveness of an intensive outpatient rehabilitation program for postacute stroke patients. , 1996, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[39]  J. Rapoport,et al.  Impact of physical therapy weekend coverage on length of stay in an acute care community hospital. , 1989, Physical therapy.

[40]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Effect of duration of upper- and lower-extremity rehabilitation sessions and walking speed on recovery of interlimb coordination in hemiplegic gait. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[41]  Paul McNamee,et al.  Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome? , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[42]  Yannan Fang,et al.  A study on additional early physiotherapy after stroke and factors affecting functional recovery , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[43]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[44]  C. O. Kennedy A controlled trial , 1971, British Homeopathic Journal.

[45]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[46]  R. Adams,et al.  A dose-response relationship between amount of weight-bearing exercise and walking outcome following cerebrovascular accident. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[47]  N B Lincoln,et al.  Effect of severity of arm impairment on response to additional physiotherapy early after stroke , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[48]  Rehabilitation research–time for a change of focus , 2002, The Lancet Neurology.

[49]  W De Weerdt,et al.  Group physiotherapy improves time use by patients with stroke in rehabilitation. , 2001, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[50]  R L Hewer,et al.  Enhanced physical therapy for arm function after stroke: a one year follow up study. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[51]  T W Meade,et al.  Remedial therapy after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. , 1981, British medical journal.

[52]  J. Salonen,et al.  The significance of intensity of rehabilitation of stroke--a controlled trial. , 1985, Stroke.

[53]  A. Forster,et al.  Physiotherapy for patients with mobility problems more than 1 year after stroke: a randomised controlled trial , 2002, The Lancet.