The role of digital artefacts in early stages of distributed innovation processes

Abstract This paper offers insights on how digital artefacts foster coordination of individuals in distributed innovation projects by limiting the divergence of team members’ representations of the project. This role is particularly important when coordination mechanisms such as leadership and modularity show some limits. Using distributed innovation in open-source software as a setting, we develop and test the hypotheses that (1) the release of initial code in open-source software projects limits the divergence of team members’ representations and (2) limiting divergence of team members’ representations triggered by initial code release implies a higher probability of project survival, a non-trivial goal in such a setting. To test our hypotheses, we draw on a dataset of 5,703 open-source software projects registered on SourceForge.net. Both our hypotheses are supported, pointing towards fruitful directions for expanding research on the way distributed innovation processes are carried out when digital artefacts are involved.

[1]  Beth A. Bechky Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[2]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[3]  M. Markus The governance of free/open source software projects: monolithic, multidimensional, or configurational? , 2007 .

[4]  Eric S. Raymond,et al.  The cathedral and the bazaar - musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary , 2001 .

[5]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Digital Innovation and the Division of Innovative Labor: Digital Controls in the Automotive Industry , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[6]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[7]  P. Puranam,et al.  Integrating Distributed Work: Comparing Task Design, Communication and Tacit Coordination Mechanisms , 2008 .

[8]  R. Langlois,et al.  Of Hackers and Hairdressers: Modularity and the Organizational Economics of Open‐source Collaboration , 2008 .

[9]  Nicolas Jullien,et al.  "Libre" software : turning fads into institutions? , 2003 .

[10]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  The Emergence of Governance in an Open Source Community , 2007 .

[11]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[12]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Community, Joining, and Specialization in Open Source Software Innovation: A Case Study , 2003 .

[13]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Stefan Haefliger,et al.  The periphery on stage: The intra-organizational dynamics in online communities of creation , 2013 .

[15]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[16]  J. Tirole,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Open Source , 2002 .

[17]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[18]  B. Hamilton,et al.  Correcting for Endogeneity in Strategic Management Research , 2003 .

[19]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential Search , 2000 .

[20]  A. Majchrzak,et al.  Unleashing the Crowd , 2019 .

[21]  Shirish C. Srivastava,et al.  Does Superposition Influence the Success of FLOSS Projects? An Examination of Open-Source Software Development by Organizations and Individuals , 2019, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[23]  Victor P. Seidel,et al.  Managing the Repertoire: Stories, Metaphors, Prototypes, and Concept Coherence in Product Innovation , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[24]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[25]  D. Dougherty Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[26]  Sandeep Krishnamurthy,et al.  Cave or Community? An Empirical Examination of 100 Mature Open Source Projects , 2002, First Monday.

[27]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  How virtual teams use their virtual workspace to coordinate knowledge , 2012, TMIS.

[28]  Tiona Zuzul “Matter Battles”: Cognitive Representations, Boundary Objects, and the Failure of Collaboration in Two Smart Cities , 2019, Academy of Management Journal.

[29]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[30]  Alan MacCormack,et al.  Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs: An Empirical Study of Open Source and Proprietary Code , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[31]  T. Schelling The Strategy of Conflict , 1963 .

[32]  Jean-Michel Dalle,et al.  Simulating Code Growth in Libre (Open-Source) Mode , 2005 .

[33]  Jacky Swan,et al.  The object of knowledge: The role of objects in biomedical innovation , 2007 .

[34]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[35]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Special Section Introduction - Online Community as Space for Knowledge Flows , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Robert Winter,et al.  Restructuring the Design Science Research Knowledge Base , 2013 .

[37]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Code Reuse in Open Source Software , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[38]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Stigmergic coordination in FLOSS development teams: Integrating explicit and implicit mechanisms , 2016, Cognitive Systems Research.

[39]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Giovan Francesco Lanzara,et al.  Artifacts rule! How organizing happens in opens source software projects , 2005 .

[41]  Joachim Henkel,et al.  Code Reuse in Open Source Software Development: Quantitative Evidence, Drivers, and Impediments , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World , 2017, MIS Q..

[43]  W. Edward Steinmueller,et al.  The institutions of open source software: Examining the Debian community , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[44]  Ping Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Extrinsic Motivations and Satisfaction in Open Source Software Development , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  The Contradictory Influence of Social Media Affordances on Online Communal Knowledge Sharing , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[46]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[47]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  How Open Crowds Self-Organize , 2020 .

[48]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Architecture of Participation: Does Code Architecture Mitigate Free Riding in the Open Source Development Model? , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[49]  John Riedl,et al.  The Impact and Evolution of Group Diversity in Online Open Collaboration , 2016, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Cecil Eng Huang Chua,et al.  Artifacts, Actors, and Interactions in the Cross-Project Coordination Practices of Open-Source Communities , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development , 2012, MIS Q..

[52]  Joel West,et al.  The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities , 2008 .

[53]  Francesco Zirpoli,et al.  Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry , 2013 .

[54]  N. Foss,et al.  Problem‐formulation and problem‐solving in self‐organized communities: How modes of communication shape project behaviors in the free open‐source software community , 2016 .

[55]  Jean-Philippe Vergne,et al.  The Missing Link between the Theory and Empirics of Path Dependence: Conceptual Clarification, Testability Issue, and Methodological Implications , 2010 .

[56]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[57]  Paul Muller,et al.  Reputation, trust and the dynamics of leadership in communities of practice , 2006 .

[58]  Sanjay Jain,et al.  Incomplete by Design and Designing for Incompleteness , 2008 .

[59]  Arvind K. Tripathi,et al.  Monetary donations to an open source software platform , 2009 .

[60]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  A Model of Collective Interpretation , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  The Intersection of Organizational Identity, Knowledge, and Practice: Attempting Strategic Change Via Knowledge Grafting , 2007 .

[62]  Jean-Michel Dalle,et al.  The Allocation of Software Development Resources In ‘Open Source’ Production Mode , 2005 .

[63]  Nancy A. Staudenmayer,et al.  Coordination Neglect: How Lay Theories of Organizing Complicate Coordination in Organizations , 2000 .

[64]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Coordination and Collective Mind in Software Requirements Development , 1998, IBM Syst. J..

[65]  Eugenia Cacciatori,et al.  Resolving Conflict in Problem‐Solving: Systems of Artefacts in the Development of New Routines , 2012 .

[66]  Eivor Oborn,et al.  Boundary object use in cross-cultural software development teams , 2010 .

[67]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams , 2006, MIS Q..

[68]  Francesco Rullani,et al.  Skills, Division of Labor and Performance in Collective Inventions. Evidence from the Open Source Software , 2004 .

[69]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[70]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..

[71]  B. Kogut,et al.  Open-source Software Development and Distributed Innovation , 2001 .

[72]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables , 1993 .

[73]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Coordinating Interdependencies in Online Communities: A Study of an Open Source Software Project , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[74]  J. Angrist,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 15, Number 4—Fall 2001—Pages 69–85 Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments , 2022 .

[75]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[76]  Markus C. Becker,et al.  How to Avoid Innovation Competence Loss in R&D Outsourcing , 2017 .

[77]  Eugenia Cacciatori,et al.  Memory objects in project environments: Storing, retrieving and adapting learning in project-based firms , 2008 .

[78]  Francesco Rullani,et al.  Explaining leadership in virtual teams: The case of open source software , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[79]  Walt Scacchi,et al.  Free software developers as an occupational community: resolving conflicts and fostering collaboration , 2003, GROUP.

[80]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Social coding in GitHub: transparency and collaboration in an open software repository , 2012, CSCW.

[81]  Paul A. David,et al.  Dynamics of Innovation in an Open Source Collaboration Environment: Lurking, Laboring, and Launching Floss Projects on Sourceforge , 2007 .

[82]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Progressing to the Center: Coordinating Project Work , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[83]  Mark Schankerman,et al.  Motivation and sorting of human capital in open innovation , 2015 .

[84]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Free/Libre open-source software development: What we know and what we do not know , 2012, CSUR.

[85]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[86]  Alessandro Narduzzo,et al.  The Role of Modularity in Free/Open Source Software Development , 2005 .

[87]  Phanish Puranam,et al.  The Microstructure of Organizations , 2018, Oxford Scholarship Online.

[88]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  10 Coordination in Organizations: An Integrative Perspective , 2009 .

[89]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Softw , 1978 .

[90]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[91]  Beth A. Bechky Object Lessons: Workplace Artifacts as Representations of Occupational Jurisdiction1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[92]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search , 2012 .

[93]  Maria Laura Parisi,et al.  From planning to mature: On the success of open source projects , 2007 .

[94]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Outsourcing to an Unknown Workforce: Exploring Opensourcing as a Global Sourcing Strategy , 2008, MIS Q..

[95]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[96]  Gino Cattani,et al.  The Value of Moderate Obsession: Insights from a New Model of Organizational Search , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[97]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  C OLLABORATION T HROUGH O PEN S UPERPOSITION : A T HEORY OF THE O PEN S OURCE W AY 1 , 2016 .

[98]  Charles W. Krueger,et al.  Software reuse , 1992, CSUR.

[99]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  The Transformation of Open Source Software , 2006, MIS Q..

[100]  P. David Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[101]  H. Simon Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[102]  Thorbjørn Knudsen,et al.  Coordinated Exploration , 2014 .

[103]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[104]  Phanish Puranam,et al.  The Firm as a Coordination System: Evidence from Software Services Offshoring , 2013 .

[105]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[106]  Wen Wen,et al.  Opening Up Intellectual Property Strategy: Implications for Open Source Software Entry by Start-up Firms , 2016, Manag. Sci..