Interaction of the IoT Traffic Generated by a Smart City Segment with SDN Core Network

The main purpose of this article is to test IoT management system based on SDN core network, as well as interaction IoT traffic with SDN-switches. To conduct investigation of management system and network infrastructure behavior we carried out several IoT traffic tests, which were generated based on partnership project oneM2M specification. In this work, we considered “Smart city” model for Central district of Saint-Petersburg (Russia). During the testing of the network infrastructure were identified several parameters such as number of simultaneously supported sessions by the Mikrotik switch using different transport protocols, was proposed a recommendation for dynamically changing virtual buffers. During the testing of the IoT management system, we define reliability of IoT data management service for determined equipment in traffic conditions of the “Smart City”. Also, we estimate relationship between RTT parameter using various IoT protocols and heterogeneous traffic in conjunction with “Smart city” segment in SDN network. In order to investigate the influence of the SDN network on the RTT traffic parameter of a large number of IoT and the condition of its transmission in conjunction with heterogeneous traffic in the network, a full-scale experiment was conducted on the developed model, which in turn reflected a possible distribution scheme of a certain monitoring and control system for the Central District Saint-Petersburg. The aim of the study is also to consider the possibility of implementing the IoT data management service as a central management system for monitoring urban ecological parameters in a dense buildings environment.

[1]  Andrey Koucheryavy State of the art and research challenges for USN traffic flow models , 2014, 16th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology.

[2]  Ammar Muthanna,et al.  Comprehensive SDN Testing Based on Model Network , 2016, NEW2AN.

[3]  Andrey Koucheryavy,et al.  Software-defined architecture for flying ubiquitous sensor networking , 2017, 2017 19th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT).

[4]  Sergey D. Andreev,et al.  Multi-radio heterogeneous networks: Architectures and performance , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC).

[5]  Andrey Koucheryavy,et al.  Internet of Things Laboratory Test Bed , 2016 .

[6]  Pavel Masek,et al.  Advanced optimization method for improving the urban traffic management , 2016, 2016 18th Conference of Open Innovations Association and Seminar on Information Security and Protection of Information Technology (FRUCT-ISPIT).

[7]  Mahmoud Al-Ayyoub,et al.  SDIoT: a software defined based internet of things framework , 2015, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

[8]  Milind R. Naphade,et al.  Smarter Cities and Their Innovation Challenges , 2011, Computer.

[9]  Mohammed Akour,et al.  A Systematic Literature Review on Software-Defined Networking , 2017 .

[10]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  Internet of Things for Smart Cities , 2014, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[11]  Andrey Koucheryavy,et al.  Live substance in cyberspace — Biodriver system , 2016, 2016 18th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT).

[12]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  A roadmap for traffic engineering in SDN-OpenFlow networks , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[13]  Andrey Koucheryavy,et al.  The mixed telemetry/image USN in the overload conditions , 2014, 16th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology.

[14]  Olga Galinina,et al.  Energy and delay analysis of LTE-Advanced RACH performance under MTC overload , 2012, 2012 IEEE Globecom Workshops.

[15]  Andrey Koucheryavy,et al.  Model networks for Internet of Things and SDN , 2016, 2016 18th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT).

[16]  R. E. Hall,et al.  VISION OF A SMART CITY , 2000 .