Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates.

Many cell types alter their morphology and gene expression profile when grown on chemically equivalent surfaces with different rigidities. One expectation of this change in morphology and composition is that the cell's internal stiffness, governed by cytoskeletal assembly and production of internal stresses, will change as a function of substrate stiffness. Atomic force microscopy was used to measure the stiffness of fibroblasts grown on fibronectin-coated polyacrylamide gels of shear moduli varying between 500 and 40,000 Pa. Indentation measurements show that the cells' elastic moduli were equal to, or slightly lower than, those of their substrates for a range of soft gels and reached a saturating value at a substrate rigidity of 20 kPa. The amount of cross-linked F-actin sedimenting at low centrifugal force also increased with substrate stiffness. Together with enhanced actin polymerization and cross-linking, active contraction of the cytoskeleton can also modulate stiffness by exploiting the nonlinear elasticity of semiflexible biopolymer networks. These results suggest that within a range of stiffness spanning that of soft tissues, fibroblasts tune their internal stiffness to match that of their substrate, and modulation of cellular stiffness by the rigidity of the environment may be a mechanism used to direct cell migration and wound repair.

[1]  B. Hinz,et al.  Alpha-smooth muscle actin expression upregulates fibroblast contractile activity. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[2]  M. D'Addario,et al.  Cytoprotection against Mechanical Forces Delivered through β1 Integrins Requires Induction of Filamin A* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[5]  M. Dembo,et al.  Substrate flexibility regulates growth and apoptosis of normal but not transformed cells. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[6]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Force‐dependent integrin–cytoskeleton linkage formation requires downregulation of focal complex dynamics by Shp2 , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[7]  R. Mahaffy,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.

[9]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[10]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Ning Wang,et al.  Is cytoskeletal tension a major determinant of cell deformability in adherent endothelial cells? , 1998, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[12]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Nonequilibrium Mechanics of Active Cytoskeletal Networks , 2007, Science.

[13]  K. Beningo,et al.  Flexible substrata for the detection of cellular traction forces. , 2002, Trends in cell biology.

[14]  P. Janmey,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels , 2004, Nature.

[15]  D. Stamenović,et al.  Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[16]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Soft biological materials and their impact on cell function. , 2007, Soft matter.

[17]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[18]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Cell organization in soft media due to active mechanosensing , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  P. Janmey,et al.  Biomechanics and Mechanotransduction in Cells and Tissues Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials , 2005 .

[20]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[21]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[22]  E. Sackmann,et al.  Protrusion force transmission of amoeboid cells crawling on soft biological tissue. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[23]  M. Glogauer,et al.  Calcium ions and tyrosine phosphorylation interact coordinately with actin to regulate cytoprotective responses to stretching. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[24]  Sebastian Rammensee,et al.  Negative normal stress in semiflexible biopolymer gels. , 2007, Nature materials.

[25]  Contributions of the Active and Passive Components of the Cytoskeletal Prestress to Stiffening of Airway Smooth Muscle Cells , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Daniel A. Hammer,et al.  Endothelial Cell Traction Forces on RGD-Derivatized Polyacrylamide Substrata † , 2003 .

[27]  K. Beningo,et al.  Flexible polyacrylamide substrata for the analysis of mechanical interactions at cell-substratum adhesions. , 2002, Methods in cell biology.

[28]  R. Eckert,et al.  h2-calponin Is Regulated by Mechanical Tension and Modifies the Function of Actin Cytoskeleton* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: An approach to isolate mechanical force , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Measuring the Elastic Properties of Thin Polymer Films with the Atomic Force Microscope , 1998 .

[31]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[32]  David F Meaney,et al.  Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Focal Contacts as Mechanosensors , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[34]  B. C,et al.  Tensegrity and mechanoregulation : from skeleton to cytoskeleton , 1999 .

[35]  Eben Alsberg,et al.  FRET measurements of cell-traction forces and nano-scale clustering of adhesion ligands varied by substrate stiffness. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Power laws in microrheology experiments on living cells: Comparative analysis and modeling. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[37]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Networks Nonequilibrium Mechanics of Active Cytoskeletal , 2007 .

[38]  Dimitrije Stamenović,et al.  Effects of cytoskeletal prestress on cell rheological behavior. , 2005, Acta biomaterialia.

[39]  Hsin-Yi Lin,et al.  Crosslinked chitosan: its physical properties and the effects of matrix stiffness on chondrocyte cell morphology and proliferation. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[40]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Cytoskeletal remodelling and slow dynamics in the living cell , 2005, Nature materials.

[41]  D Stamenović,et al.  Contribution of intermediate filaments to cell stiffness, stiffening, and growth. , 2000, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[42]  Y. Wang,et al.  Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  K. Burridge,et al.  Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[44]  P. Janmey,et al.  Strain hardening of fibrin gels and plasma clots , 1997 .

[45]  Ning Wang,et al.  Mechanics of vimentin intermediate filaments , 2004, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[46]  Pablo Fernández,et al.  A master relation defines the nonlinear viscoelasticity of single fibroblasts. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[47]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Elastic interactions of cells. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[48]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[49]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[50]  Lisa A Flanagan,et al.  Neurite branching on deformable substrates , 2002, Neuroreport.