Area and habitat relationships of birds in Great Lakes coastal wet meadows

Although relationships of birds to patch area and habitat characteristics have been dominant themes in avian ecology over the past few decades, relatively little is known about these relationships in wetland-dominated landscapes of the Great Lakes coastline. During 1997 and 1998, we surveyed birds and measured habitat characteristics along transects in wet meadows associated with the northern Lake Huron shoreline (NLHS) in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Using a suite of multivariate techniques, we related abundance and presence/absence of individual species to wet meadow area and habitat characteristics. Nine species were positively associated with increasing wet meadow area, which underscores the importance of large wetlands to avian conservation in the region. Bird variables also were related to habitat characteristies. Higher values of bird variables were generally associated with a suite of characteristics: more robust and dense grass/sedge vegetation, structural diversity in the horizontal and vertical planes, and increased frequency of willow shrubs. Individual species that require particular aspects of these characteristics for nesting or foraging were associated with principal components containing those aspects. In the NLHS, large wet meadows that possess these characteristics would support the greatest diversity and benefit the majority of species. However, conservation efforts that focus only on these traits will not be sufficient for all species because habitat requirements for some species are very specific (e. g., open water for mallard), and for others, habitat preferences may change from year to year in response to lake-level changes. While our results provide important insights, continued research is needed to further the successful conservation and management of birds in Great Lakes coastal wetlands.

[1]  R. Degraaf,et al.  RELATIONSHIP OF BREEDING BIRD DENSITY AND DIVERSITY TO HABITAT VARIABLES IN FORESTED WETLANDS , 1984 .

[2]  R. Forman,et al.  ROADS AND THEIR MAJOR ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS , 1998 .

[3]  Martin L. Cody,et al.  Habitat selection in birds , 1986 .

[4]  M. Brown,et al.  Implications of Marsh Size and Isolation for Marsh Bird Management , 1986 .

[5]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[6]  D. Naugle,et al.  A landscape approach to conserving wetland bird habitat in the Prairie Pothole Region of eastern South Dakota , 2000, Wetlands.

[7]  Frank R. Thompson,et al.  Analysis of Sample Size, Counting Time, and Plot Size from an Avian Point Count Survey on Hoosier National Forest, Indiana , 1995 .

[8]  S. Riffell,et al.  Birds in North American Great Lakes coastal wet meadows: is landscape context important? , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[9]  M. Villard,et al.  Fragmentation Effects on Forest Birds: Relative Influence of Woodland Cover and Configuration on Landscape Occupancy , 1999 .

[10]  Fiona K. A. Schmiegelow,et al.  ARE BOREAL BIRDS RESILIENT TO FOREST FRAGMENTATION? AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF SHORT‐TERM COMMUNITY RESPONSES , 1997 .

[11]  Henrik Andrén,et al.  Corvid Density and Nest Predation in Relation to Forest Fragmentation: A Landscape Perspective , 1992 .

[12]  Milton W. Weller Wetland Birds: Frontmatter , 1999 .

[13]  Rupert G. Miller Simultaneous Statistical Inference , 1966 .

[14]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[15]  J. Gibbs,et al.  Call-Response Surveys for Monitoring Breeding Waterbirds , 1993 .

[16]  H. Andrén,et al.  Effects of landscape composition on predation rates at habitat edges , 1995 .

[17]  J. Verner,et al.  Assessment of Counting Techniques , 1985 .

[18]  K. J. Gutzwiller,et al.  BIRD-LANDSCAPE RELATIONS IN THE CHIHUAHUAN DESERT: COPING WITH UNCERTAINTIES ABOUT PREDICTIVE MODELS , 2001 .

[19]  L. Petit,et al.  Factors Governing Habitat Selection by Prothonotary Warblers: Field Tests of the Fretwell‐Lucas Models , 1996 .

[20]  M. Brown,et al.  Area-dependent Changes in Bird Densities in Iowa Marshes , 1991 .

[21]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Bird Species Diversity , 1961 .

[22]  Douglas A. Wilcox,et al.  Use of historical and geospatial data to guide the restoration of a Lake Erie coastal marsh , 1999, Wetlands.

[23]  Dennis E. Jelinski,et al.  THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF PATCH AREA AND PERIMETER–AREA RATIO TO GRASSLAND BREEDING BIRDS , 1999 .

[24]  Kevin J. Gutzwiller,et al.  Effects of human intrusion on song occurrence and singing consistency in subalpine birds , 1994 .

[25]  Paul Hendricks,et al.  A Fixed-Radius Point Count Method for Nonbreeding and Breeding-Season Use , 1986 .

[26]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[27]  R. Forman,et al.  Avian Distribution Patterns in Forest Islands of Different Sizes in Central New Jersey , 1976 .

[28]  R. R. Cox,et al.  Avian use of purple loosestrife dominated habitat relative to other vegetation types in a Lake Huron Wetland Complex , 1999 .

[29]  M. Cody Habitat selection in birds , 1987 .

[30]  H. A. Kantrud,et al.  Nest and nest site characterisitcs of some ground-nesting, non-passerine birds of northern grasslands , 1992 .

[31]  B. Peterjohn,et al.  Conservation of grassland birds in the western hemisphere , 1999 .

[32]  P. Eagles,et al.  Effects of Residential Development on Forest-Dwelling Neotropical Migrant Songbirds , 1995 .

[33]  R. Lyman Ott.,et al.  An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis , 1977 .

[34]  Malcolm L. Hunter,et al.  Effects of Habitat Area on the Distribution of Grassland Birds in Maine , 1994 .

[35]  J. Faaborg,et al.  Patterns of Area Sensitivity in Grassland‐Nesting Birds , 1999 .

[36]  J. K. Terres,et al.  The Audubon Society Encyclopedia of North American Birds , 1980 .

[37]  J. Karr,et al.  Breeding Birds of Isolated Woodlots: Area and Habitat Relationships. , 1987, Ecology.

[38]  J. Neyman,et al.  Interpretation of Canonical Discriminant Functions, Canonical Variates, and Principal Components , 1992 .

[39]  J. Wiens Single-Sample Surveys of Communities: Are the Revealed Patterns Real? , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[40]  J. Tewksbury,et al.  BREEDING PRODUCTIVITY DOES NOT DECLINE WITH INCREASING FRAGMENTATION IN A WESTERN LANDSCAPE , 1998 .

[41]  R. Knapton,et al.  Waterfowl Use of the Laurentian Great Lakes , 1992 .

[42]  M. Willson,et al.  Avian Community Organization and Habitat Structure , 1974 .

[43]  C. S. Robbins,et al.  Habitat area requirements of breeding forest birds of the middle Atlantic states , 1989 .

[44]  W. Rice ANALYZING TABLES OF STATISTICAL TESTS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  Russell D. Wolfinger,et al.  Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests Using the SAS System , 1999 .

[46]  J. Wiens,et al.  Habitat Structure, Patchiness, and Avian Communities in North American Steppe Vegetation: A Multivariate Analysis , 1980 .

[47]  R. H. Myers Classical and modern regression with applications , 1986 .

[48]  F. Götmark The Effects of Investigator Disturbance on Nesting Birds , 1992 .

[49]  Sarah M. Nusser,et al.  Scale-dependent habitat use in three species of prairie wetland birds , 1999, Landscape Ecology.

[50]  K. J. Gutzwiller,et al.  Multiscale Associations between Cavity-Nesting Birds and Features of Wyoming Streamside Woodlands , 1987 .

[51]  Milton W. Weller,et al.  Wetland Birds: Subject index , 1999 .

[52]  C. F. Estades,et al.  DECIDUOUS-FOREST BIRD COMMUNITIES IN A FRAGMENTED LANDSCAPE DOMINATED BY EXOTIC PINE PLANTATIONS , 1999 .

[53]  James R. Herkert,et al.  The Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Midwestern Grassland Bird Communities , 1994 .

[54]  K. J. Gutzwiller,et al.  Does Repeated Human Intrusion Cause Cumulative Declines in Avian Richness and Abundance , 1996 .

[55]  John R. Sauer,et al.  Monitoring Bird Populations by Point Counts , 1997 .

[56]  Joel C. Trexler,et al.  Nontraditional Regression Analyses , 1993 .