User Experience and the Spectacles of the Small: On Mundane Change and Encounters

My interest in this talk is in exploration of small change and the study of user experience. How can small, mundane and usually hidden change(s) interact with the study of user experience to gain the visible force needed to propel both into deeper understandings of users (and more canny products)?

[1]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Number of people required for usability evaluation , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[2]  Robert R. Johnson,et al.  User-Centered Technology: A Rhetorical Theory for Computers and Other Mundane Artifacts , 1998 .

[3]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Work-oriented design of computer artifacts , 1989 .

[4]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[5]  Patricia Sullivan,et al.  Opening Spaces: Writing Technologies and Critical Research Practices , 1997 .

[6]  Bella Martin,et al.  Universal Methods of Design: 100 Ways to Research Complex Problems, Develop Innovative Ideas, and Design Effective Solutions , 2012 .

[7]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work , 1999, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[8]  M. Dieli,et al.  The usability process: working with iterative design principles , 1989 .

[9]  Chris Arney.  Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2015 .

[10]  Daniel B. Felker.  Guidelines for Document Designers. , 1981 .

[11]  Patricia Malone.  Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard , 2011 .

[12]  Susanne Bødker.  Scenarios in user-centred designsetting the stage for reflection and action , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[13]  Patricia Sullivan.  Beyond a narrow conception of usability testing , 1989 .

[14]  W. Ong.  Historical Backgrounds of Elizabethan and Jacobean Punctuation Theory , 1944, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America.

[15]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[16]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Computers as theatre , 1991 .

[17]  Doreen Schweizer,et al.  Digital Ground Architecture Pervasive Computing And Environmental Knowing , 2016 .

[18]  Walter J. Ong,et al.  The Writer's Audience Is Always a Fiction , 1975 .

[19]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Estimating the number of subjects needed for a thinking aloud test , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  Jeffrey T. Grabill,et al.  Institutional Critique: A Rhetorical Methodology for Change , 2000, College Composition & Communication.

[21]  L. Suchman.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd edition). , 2007 .

[22]  Jack Whalen,et al.  Making work visible : ethnographically grounded case studies of work practice , 2011 .

[23]  Robyn Philip,et al.  The grammar of visual design , 2006 .

[24]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Scenarios in user-centred design-setting the stage for reflection and action , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[25]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change , 2000 .

[26]  WooSoo Park.  The New Rhetoric , 2011 .

[27]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions , 2006 .

[28]  Libby Hemphill,et al.  Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions, 2nd ed , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[29]  Janice Redish,et al.  Readability formulas have even more limitations than Klare discusses , 2000, AJCD.

[30]  Patricia Sullivan,et al.  Practicing safe visual rhetoric on the World Wide Web , 2001 .

[31]  Julian Dibbell,et al.  My Tiny Life: Crime and Passion in a Virtual World , 1998 .