Shared smallcell networks multi-operator or third party solutions - or both?

Network sharing is a commonly used solution for macro cellular networks when mobile operators want to exploit benefits of sharing infrastructure, typically to save network costs. For local area and indoor networks infrastructure sharing using distributed antenna systems (DAS) and repeaters are commonly used solutions to improve indoor coverage. For these applications multi-operator solutions are well known and supported by both standardization bodies and by collaboration practices. However, when local networks are discussed in terms of femtocell solutions, offloading or heterogeneous networks, the multi-operator context seems to be forgotten. Small cells are often presented in a single-operator context. This does not comply with market demand and practices, since facility owners neither want one single mobile operator to dominate the capacity provision nor accept multiple indoor infrastructures provided by multiple mobile operators. In this paper we will discuss the business model implications of different multi-operator solutions for indoor deployment. The key findings are in the areas of: i) how multi-operator small cell solutions can fit into existing market practices when it comes to operator business, ii) how local network operators (3rd parties) and outsourcing can play a role in the business landscape, and iii) how different (novel) spectrum allocation and access strategies can play a role for indoor network deployment.

[1]  Afef Feki,et al.  Enhanced Resource Sharing Strategies for LTE Picocells with Heterogeneous Traffic Loads , 2011, 2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[2]  Thomas Frisanco Strategic and Economic Benefits of Regionalization, Centralization, and Outsourcing of Mobile Network Operations Processes , 2009, 2009 Fifth International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications.

[3]  Phillip A. Laplante,et al.  The who, what, why, where, and when of IT outsourcing , 2004, IT Professional.

[4]  J. Markendahl,et al.  On co-opetition between mobile network operators: Why and how competitors cooperate , 2012 .

[5]  Dominic Schupke,et al.  Toward Modeling Rationalization Potential in Network Operations and Maintenance Outsourcing , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[6]  Heterogeneous networks – increasing cellular capacity , .

[7]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's Technology Spin-Off Companies , 2002 .

[8]  Shahid A. Zia,et al.  Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries & Competitors , 2013 .

[9]  Marina Petrova,et al.  On the scalability of cognitive radio: assessing the commercial viability of secondary spectrum access , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[10]  Fieke Offergelt,et al.  If you can't beat 'em, join 'em cooperative and non-cooperative games in network sharing , 2011, 2011 15th International Conference on Intelligence in Next Generation Networks.

[11]  C. Beckman,et al.  Shared networks: making wireless communication affordable , 2005, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[12]  Petri Mähönen,et al.  Riding the data tsunami in the cloud: myths and challenges in future wireless access , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  Adel A. M. Saleh,et al.  Distributed Antennas for Indoor Radio Communications , 1987, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[14]  Mahesh Viswanathan,et al.  Taking IT Management Services to a Cloud , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing.

[15]  Christos Politis,et al.  Positioning for performance enhancement in shared LTE and HSPA networks , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Telecommunications and Multimedia (TEMU).

[16]  Jan Markendahl,et al.  Business models for deployment and operation of femtocell networks : Are new cooperation strategies needed for mobile operators? , 2010 .

[17]  Amirhossein Ghanbari Indoor multi-operator solutions, Network sharing and Outsourcing network management and operation , 2013 .

[18]  Pei Liu,et al.  The urge to merge: When cellular service providers pool capacity , 2011, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[19]  Antonio Nicita,et al.  Authorised Shared Access (ASA): An Innovative Model of Pro-Competitive Spectrum Management , 2011 .

[20]  Klaus Moessner,et al.  Maximum Outage Capacity in Dense Indoor Femtocell Networks with Joint Energy and Spectrum Utilization , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[21]  F. Bar,et al.  Municipal Wi-Fi Networks: The Goals, Practices, and Policy Implications of the U.S. Case (*) , 2006 .

[22]  Thomas Frisanco,et al.  Infrastructure Sharing for Mobile Network Operators; From a Deployment and Operations View , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Information Networking.

[23]  H. Håkansson,et al.  No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy , 1989 .

[24]  Marina Petrova,et al.  Wi-Fi, but not on Steroids: Performance analysis of a Wi-Fi-like Network operating in TVWS under realistic conditions , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[25]  Zoraida Frias,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of femtocell deployment in long-term evolution networks , 2012, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[26]  Jan Markendahl Mobile Network Operators and Cooperation : A Tele-Economic Study of Infrastructure sharing and Mobile Payment Services , 2011 .

[27]  Wolfgang Kellerer,et al.  Network sharing in the next mobile network: TCO reduction, management flexibility, and operational independence , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.