Flexible social structure of a desert rodent, Rhombomys opimus: philopatry, kinship, and ecological constraints

We tested hypotheses based on philopatry, kinship, and ecological constraints to explain sociality in a semifossorial desert rodent, the great gerbil, Rhombomys opimus. Data were collected in the field in Uzbekistan in the spring and fall of 1996 and 1998--2004. Population densities fluctuated dramatically with high turnover in both males and females to reveal that dispersal and social structure were density dependent. Fewer gerbils dispersed at higher densities and members of family groups dispersed together. A majority of females lived in groups at high densities, but as population densities declined, proportionally more females were solitary. DNA analysis revealed that group-living females were genetically similar, whereas solitary females visited by the same male, as well as adult males and females in the same family group, were usually not genetically similar. Reproductive success as measured by the number of emergent pups and survival of juveniles during the summer drought was not related to group size or whether females were philopatric. A majority of females in family groups reproduced, and all females engaged in cooperative behaviors. We accepted three hypotheses to explain fluctuations in group formation in the great gerbil: variation in food abundance and distribution, habitat saturation, and kinship. We conclude that great gerbils are facultatively social. Flexible social behavior may be adaptive in unpredictable desert conditions. Females live solitarily under conditions of limited food and high mortality that disrupt social behavior and group formation and share territories with female kin under favorable conditions for survival and reproduction when kin groups can be maintained. Males adjust to the distribution of females. Copyright 2005.

[1]  W. Hamilton The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  L. Getz,et al.  Fitness consequences of sociality in prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster: influence of group size and composition , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  P. Greenwood Mating systems, philopatry and dispersal in birds and mammals , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  T. Mappes,et al.  Higher Reproductive Success among Kin Groups of Bank Voles (Clethrionomys Glareolus) , 1995 .

[5]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Does Sociality Drive The Evolution Of Communicative Complexity? A Comparative Test With Ground‐Dwelling Sciurid Alarm Calls , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[6]  F. Bozinovic,et al.  Communal burrowing in the hystricognath rodent, Octodon degus: a benefit of sociality? , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  Samuel M. Flaxman,et al.  The evolutionary stability of mixed strategies , 2000 .

[8]  A. Pusey,et al.  Inbreeding avoidance in animals. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  W. Koenig,et al.  The Evolution of Delayed Dispersal in Cooperative Breeders , 1992, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[10]  J. Randall,et al.  Antipredator behavior of a social desert rodent: footdrumming and alarm calling in the great gerbil, Rhombomys opiums , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  John Wieczorek,et al.  Kinship in colonial tuco-tucos: evidence from group composition and population structure , 2004 .

[12]  P. Parker,et al.  Multilocus minisatellite DNA fingerprinting and cooperative breeding , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  I. Prakash,et al.  Hormonal Control of Scent Marking Behaviour in Indian Gerbil , 1985 .

[14]  Steven N. Austad,et al.  A Classification of Alternative Reproductive Behaviors and Methods for Field-testing ESS Models , 1984 .

[15]  R. Chesser,et al.  Influence of gene flow and breeding tactics on gene diversity within populations. , 1991, Genetics.

[16]  N. Solomon A REEXAMINATION OF FACTORS INFLUENCING PHILOPATRY IN RODENTS , 2003 .

[17]  D. Allainé Sociality, mating system and reproductive skew in marmots: evidence and hypotheses , 2000, Behavioural Processes.

[18]  M. Georges,et al.  DNA fingerprinting in domestic animals using four different minisatellite probes. , 1988, Cytogenetics and cell genetics.

[19]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Adaptive Evolution of Social Traits: Origin, Trajectories, and Correlations of Altruism and Mobility , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[20]  L. Hayes To nest communally or not to nest communally: a review of rodent communal nesting and nursing , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  N. P. Naumov,et al.  Ecology of Desert Rodents of the U.S.S.R. (Jerboas and Gerbils) , 1975 .

[22]  N. Perrin,et al.  Local Competition, Inbreeding, and the Evolution of Sex‐Biased Dispersal , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[23]  K. Zuberbühler Referential labelling in Diana monkeys , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  J. Randall,et al.  Stress and nutrition in the wild. , 2003 .

[25]  James H. Brown,et al.  Biology of the Heteromyidae , 1993 .

[26]  M. O'Riain,et al.  Mammalian eusociality: a family affair. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Does social complexity lead to sex-biased dispersal in polygynous mammals? A test on ground-dwelling sciurids , 2004 .

[28]  Kenneth B. Armitage,et al.  Sociality as a life-history tactic of ground squirrels , 1981, Oecologia.

[29]  S. Emlen,et al.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. , 1977, Science.

[30]  P. Marler,et al.  Vervet monkey alarm calls: Semantic communication in a free-ranging primate , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  Stephen T. Emlen,et al.  The Evolution of Helping. I. An Ecological Constraints Model , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[32]  N. Pillay,et al.  INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN THE SPATIAL AND SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF THE AFRICAN STRIPED MOUSE , 2005 .

[33]  S. Emlen An evolutionary theory of the family. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  R. D. Alexander,et al.  The evolution of social behavior , 1974 .

[35]  J. Jarvis,et al.  Ecological constraints drive social evolution in the African mole–rats , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  J. O. Wolff Reproductive success of solitarily and communally nesting white-footed mice and deer mice , 1994 .

[37]  E. Nevo,et al.  Ecophysiological constraints associated with aggression, and evolution toward pacifism in Spalax ehrenbergi , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  D. Lott,et al.  Intraspecific Variation in the Social Systems of Wild Vertebrates , 1991 .

[39]  P. Parker,et al.  Using DNA Fingerprinting to Estimate Relatedness within Social Groups of Pine Voles , 1997 .

[40]  Spatial Ecology of Desert Rodent Communities , 1999, Adaptations of Desert Organisms.

[41]  M. Manser,et al.  The information that receivers extract from alarm calls in suricates , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  L. Getz,et al.  Pattern of Nest Occupancy of the Prairie Vole Microtus ochrogaster in Different Habitats , 1992 .

[43]  H. Cofré,et al.  On the evolution of group-living in the New World cursorial hystricognath rodents , 2001 .

[44]  J. Randall,et al.  PREDATION ON A SOCIAL DESERT RODENT, RHOMBOMYS OPIMUS: EFFECT OF GROUP SIZE, COMPOSITION, AND LOCATION , 2004 .

[45]  F. Dobson,et al.  Competition for mates and predominant juvenile male dispersal in mammals , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  L. Getz,et al.  The Effects of Predation of Snakes on Social Organization of the Prairie Vole, Microtus ochrogaster , 1990 .

[47]  Jim Moore,et al.  Are dispersal and inbreeding avoidance related? , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  J. Komdeur,et al.  Transfer experiments of Seychelles warblers to new islands: changes in dispersal and helping behaviour , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  N. Pillay,et al.  The striped mouse (Rhabdomys pumilio) from the succulent karoo, South Africa: a territorial group-living solitary forager with communal breeding and helpers at the nest. , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[50]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[51]  Q. Zhou,et al.  Territoriality, cooperation and resource priority: hoarding in the Mongolian gerbil,Meriones unguiculatus , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[52]  W. Zhong,et al.  Ecology and social behaviour of Mongolian gerbils,Meriones unguiculatus, at Xilinhot, Inner Mongolia, China , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[53]  M. Matocq,et al.  Philopatry, kin clusters, and genetic relatedness in a population of woodrats (Neotoma macrotis) , 2004 .

[54]  B. Hatchwell,et al.  Ecological constraints, life history traits and the evolution of cooperative breeding , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[55]  D. Parkin,et al.  Demographic study of a wild house sparrow population by DNA fingerprinting , 1987, Nature.

[56]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Optimal Mixed Strategies in Stochastic Environments , 1995 .

[57]  M. Elgar,et al.  PREDATOR VIGILANCE AND GROUP SIZE IN MAMMALS AND BIRDS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE , 1989, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[58]  L. Lehmann,et al.  Is Sociality Driven by the Costs of Dispersal or the Benefits of Philopatry? A Role for Kin‐Discrimination Mechanisms , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[59]  M. Bekoff Mammalian Dispersal and the Ontogeny of Individual Behavioral Phenotypes , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[60]  P. Parker,et al.  WHAT MOLECULES CAN TELL US ABOUT POPULATIONS: CHOOSING ANDUSING A MOLECULAR MARKER , 1998 .

[61]  B. Krasnov,et al.  Intra- and interspecific variation in vigilance and foraging of two gerbillid rodents, Rhombomys opimus andPsammomys obesus : the effect of social environment , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  Does the resource dispersion hypothesis explain group living , 2002 .

[63]  Swee Lay Thein,et al.  Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA , 1985, Nature.

[64]  J. Wolff,et al.  Parents suppress reproduction and stimulate dispersal in opposite-sex juvenile white-footed mice , 1992, Nature.

[65]  H. Kokko,et al.  Dispersal, Migration, and Offspring Retention in Saturated Habitats , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[66]  P. Keim,et al.  Ecological and demographic effects on intraspecific variation in the social system of prairie dogs , 1995 .

[67]  P. Parker,et al.  Local genetic structure within two rookeries of Chelonia mydas (the green turtle) , 1996, Heredity.

[68]  M. Lynch,et al.  Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[69]  C. G. Faulkes,et al.  Family values: group dynamics and social control of reproduction in African mole-rats. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[70]  J. Randall Convergences and Divergences in Communication and Social-Organization of Desert Rodents , 1994 .

[71]  S. Emlen,et al.  Benefits, constrainsts and the evolution of the family. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[72]  Hanna Kokko,et al.  The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[73]  Janice C. Daniel,et al.  Yellow-bellied marmots discriminate between the alarm calls of individuals and are more responsive to calls from juveniles , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[74]  J. Randall,et al.  Social correlates of stress in adult males of the great gerbil, Rhombomys opimus, in years of high and low population densities , 2003, Hormones and Behavior.

[75]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[76]  M. Lynch,et al.  The similarity index and DNA fingerprinting. , 1990, Molecular biology and evolution.

[77]  J. Randall,et al.  Variation in and Meaning of Alarm Calls in a Social Desert Rodent Rhombomys opimus , 2002 .

[78]  C. Slobodchikoff Resources and the Evolution of Social Behavior , 1984 .

[79]  P. Waser Chapter 6 – RESOURCES, PHILOPATRY, AND SOCIAL INTERACTIONS AMONG MAMMALS , 1988 .

[80]  L. Keller,et al.  Reproductive sharing in animal societies: reproductive incentives or incomplete control by dominant breeders? , 1998 .