Design scoreboard: Capturing design spending in firms

The value of design is increasingly recognised, but design is often overlooked in favour of R&D in the measurement of innovation. Design is difficult to define, which makes it difficult to measure in financial terms. R&D was previously considered difficult to measure, but, as it is now well defined, financial measures of R&D have been established. Several previous studies demonstrated the commercial value of design, but failed to propose a reliable approach to capture design spending at the level of the firm. This paper presents a framework for classifying design activities and capturing design spending in firms. A number of exploratory case studies were conducted, four of which are described, to explore how companies understood design and how it could be measured. A conceptual model, by which the extent of design activity in firms may be better understood, is proposed. This model will be used as the basis of questions in a survey of design spending in UK firms.

[1]  Julie H. Hertenstein,et al.  Valuing design: Enhancing corporate performance through design effectiveness , 2010 .

[2]  Bruce Tether,et al.  Design in Innovation: Coming out from the Shadow of R&D, An analysis of the UK Innovation Surveys of 2005 , 2009 .

[3]  Bram Snitslaar,et al.  Design Inspired Innovation – By J. Utterback, B.A. Vedin, E. Alvarez, S. Ekman, S.W. Sanderson, B. Tether and R. Verganti , 2007 .

[4]  Bengt-Arne Vedin,et al.  Design-Inspired Innovation , 2006 .

[5]  M. Porter,et al.  UK Competitiveness: moving to the next stage , 2003 .

[6]  J Whyte,et al.  Design in business: strategic innovation design , 2002 .

[7]  Andrew Cooke,et al.  Design principles for the development of measurement systems for research and development processes , 1997 .

[8]  J. Riedel,et al.  Design and Innovation in Successful Product Competition , 1997 .

[9]  Vivien Walsh,et al.  Design, innovation and the boundaries of the firm , 1996 .

[10]  Michael W. Lawless,et al.  Technology and Strategy: Conceptual Models and Diagnostics , 1994 .

[11]  Edward J. Ottensmeyer.  Third generation R&D: Managing the link to corporate strategy : by Philip A. Roussel, Kamal N. Saad, and Tamara J. Erickson, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1991, 192 pp. , 1993 .

[12]  Margaret Bruce,et al.  WINNING BY DESIGN , 1992 .

[13]  R. Rothwell.  Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s , 1992 .

[14]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees: , 1992 .

[15]  Philip A. Roussel,et al.  Third generation R & D : managing the link to corporate strategy / Philip A. Roussel, Kamal N. Saad, Tamara J. Erickson , 1991 .

[16]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Design for success , 1991 .

[17]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Success through design , 1987 .

[18]  P. Kotler,et al.  DESIGN: A POWERFUL BUT NEGLECTED STRATEGIC TOOL , 1984 .

[19]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[20]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in a Changing World: Responding to Policy Needs , 2007 .

[21]  R. Verganti.  Innovating through design , 2006 .

[22]  G. Gemser,et al.  How integrating industrial design in the product development process impacts on company performance , 2001 .

[23]  J. H. Gilmore,et al.  Welcome to the experience economy. , 1998, Harvard business review.