An Input–Output Parametrization of Stabilizing Controllers: Amidst Youla and System Level Synthesis

This letter proposes a novel input–output parametrization of the set of internally stabilizing output-feedback controllers for linear time invariant (LTI) systems. Our underlying idea is to directly treat the closed-loop transfer matrices from disturbances to input and output signals as design parameters and exploit their affine relationships. This input–output perspective is particularly effective when a doubly coprime factorization is difficult to compute, or an initial stabilizing controller is challenging to find; most previous work requires one of these pre-computation steps. Instead, our approach can bypass such pre-computations, in the sense that a stabilizing controller is computed by directly solving a linear program (LP). Furthermore, we show that the proposed input–output parametrization allows for computing norm-optimal controllers subject to quadratically invariant (QI) constraints using convex programming.

[1]  Petteri Laakkonen,et al.  Robust Regulation Theory for Transfer Functions With a Coprime Factorization , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[2]  Alban Quadrat On a generalization of the Youla–Kučera parametrization. Part II: the lattice approach to MIMO systems , 2006, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[3]  Nuno C. Martins,et al.  Youla-Like Parametrizations Subject to QI Subspace Constraints , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[4]  Kazuyoshi Mori Elementary proof of controller parametrization without coprime factorizability , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[5]  Sanjay Lall,et al.  A Characterization of Convex Problems in Decentralized Control$^ast$ , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[6]  M. Rotkowitz,et al.  Q-Parametrization and an SDP for H∞-optimal Decentralized Control , 2013 .

[7]  Nikolai Matni,et al.  A System-Level Approach to Controller Synthesis , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Hitay Özbay,et al.  Robust Control of Infinite Dimensional Systems: Frequency Domain Methods , 1996 .

[9]  C. Jacobson,et al.  A connection between state-space and doubly coprime fractional representations , 1984 .

[10]  Holger Boche,et al.  Advanced Topics in System and Signal Theory - A Mathematical Approach , 2010, Foundations in Signal Processing, Communications and Networking.

[11]  Ian Postlethwaite,et al.  Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design , 1996 .

[12]  Dante C. Youla,et al.  Modern Wiener-Hopf Design of Optimal Controllers. Part I , 1976 .

[13]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Linear controller design: limits of performance , 1991 .

[14]  B. Francis,et al.  A Course in H Control Theory , 1987 .

[15]  Arno Linnemann,et al.  Convergent Ritz approximations of the set of stabilizing controllers , 1999 .

[16]  J. Lofberg,et al.  YALMIP : a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37508).

[17]  H. Witsenhausen A Counterexample in Stochastic Optimum Control , 1968 .

[18]  Sanjay Lall,et al.  An algebraic framework for quadratic invariance , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[19]  Malcolm C. Smith On stabilization and the existence of coprime factorizations , 1989 .

[20]  Nuno C. Martins,et al.  A Convex Characterization of Multidimensional Linear Systems Subject to SQI Constraints , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[21]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  A survey of computational complexity results in systems and control , 2000, Autom..